首页|原发性胆汁反流性胃炎患者人格、情绪及应对方式分析

原发性胆汁反流性胃炎患者人格、情绪及应对方式分析

扫码查看
目的探讨原发性胆汁反流性胃炎(PBRG)患者的人格、情绪及应对方式。方法选取60例PBRG的患者入研究组,60例健康自愿者入对照组,使用艾森克人格问卷(Eysenck Personality Questionnaire,EPQ)、状态-特质焦虑问卷(State-Trait Anxiety Inventory,STAI)及简易应对方式问卷(Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire,SCSQ)分别对两组人员进行测评,并对两组人员的问卷测评情况进行比较分析。结果 EPQ测评:研究组的N分(神经质/情绪性)显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);STAI测评:研究组的状态焦虑量表分)及特质焦虑量表分均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);SCSQ测评:研究组的积极应对平均分显著低于对照组(P<0.05),消极应对平均分与对照组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论PBRG与神经质人格、焦虑情绪、缺少积极的应对方式密切相关。
The personality, emotion and coping styles of patients with primary biliary reflux gastritis
Objective To investigate the personality, emotion and coping styles of the patients with primary biliary reflux gastritis(PBRG). Methods 60 patients which diagnosed as PBRG selected into study group, and 60 healthy volunteers into the control group. All cases of these two groups were evaluated by the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire(EPQ), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory(STAI) and Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire(SCSQ). Compared and analysised the difference of the data of two group. Results In EPQ, the scores of the N(Neuroticism/emotional) factor in Study group were significantly higher than those in control group(P<0.01); In STAI, the total scores both of state anxiety and the trait anxiety in Study group were significantly higher than those in control group(P<0.01); In SCSQ, the average scores of positive coping fator in the Study group were significantly lower than those in control group(P<0.01); the average scores of negative coping fator in the Study group compare with those in control group, the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05). Conclusion Neuroticism, anxiety, as well as lack of positive coping styles are closely associated with the PBRG.

Bile reflux gastritisPersonalityEmotionsCoping style

王巧敏、李妙根、徐智立

展开 >

528000 广东省佛山市妇幼保健院内科

胆汁反流性胃炎 人格 情绪 应对方式 心理

2013

中国医疗前沿
中国医院协会

中国医疗前沿

影响因子:0.186
ISSN:1673-5552
年,卷(期):2013.(9)
  • 3
  • 4