A comparative effectiveness research of Rockall and Blatchford scoring system for evaluating acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Objective To analyze Rockall and Blatchford scoring system for evaluating acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding score results. Methods 86 cases of patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding were selected, respectively using Rockall and Blatchford risk score system scored and grouped the patients by risk scores. Also observed the actual classification in the clinical course of rescue with two kinds of scoring methods for reference. Results The number of groups of Blatchford risk score of 2 points or less fewer than the Rockall’s, the differences were statistically significant the other two kinds of risk score was no significant difference; Rockall score in accordance with the relevant criteria, patients were divided into high-risk, medium risk, low risk group, Blatchford scoring system were divided into low-risk and high-risk groups, 86 patients in the clinical treatment were relatively easy to deal with 59 cases, and with 27 patients were refractory, and was similar with Blatchford score. Conclusions Blatchford risk scoring system is more suitable for clinical classification methods, and combined with Rockall scoring method can be good for low-risk population division.
NETL
NSTL
万方数据
维普
