中国药物依赖性杂志2024,Vol.33Issue(1) :69-74.DOI:10.13936/j.cnki.cjdd1992.2024.01.013

电话访谈法在门诊筛查苯二氮类药物依赖的效果分析

Analysis of the effect of telephone interview in outpatient screening of benzodiazepines dependence

徐佩茹 陈建平 田月洁 黄元 荣右明 陈旭
中国药物依赖性杂志2024,Vol.33Issue(1) :69-74.DOI:10.13936/j.cnki.cjdd1992.2024.01.013

电话访谈法在门诊筛查苯二氮类药物依赖的效果分析

Analysis of the effect of telephone interview in outpatient screening of benzodiazepines dependence

徐佩茹 1陈建平 2田月洁 3黄元 3荣右明 3陈旭2
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 济宁医学院精神卫生学院,山东济宁 272000;宁波大学附属康宁医院精神科,宁波市康宁医院精神科,宁波,315201
  • 2. 山东大学附属山东省精神卫生中心,济南 250014
  • 3. 山东省药品不良反应监测中心,济南 250013
  • 折叠

摘要

目的 本研究创新性地将电话访谈法与结构式访谈相结合,在保障一对一有效访谈的基础上降低时间等相关成本,并探讨基于结构式访谈纲要的电话访谈法在门诊筛查苯二氮类药物(benzodiazepines,BZDs)依赖的效果.方法 在门诊处方BZDs的人群中应用平均日最大量(average daily maximum dose,ADMD)筛查出可疑药物依赖人群,在该人群中利用随机数字表法抽取40例,进行基于结构式访谈纲要的电话访谈,并预约现场评估及诊断.对其应用苯二氮类药物依赖自评量表(Benzodiazepine Dependence Questionnaire,BDEPQ)进行评估,并用国际疾病分类第 10 版(International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision,ICD-10)进行现场诊断.运用 Kappa 检验比较基于结构式访谈纲要的电话访谈法与医生诊断、量表评估之间的一致性并进行分析,用Fisher确切概率法评估其差异性.结果 基于结构式访谈纲要的电话访谈法与BDEPQ量表评估的一致性较好(Kappa值=0.773),阳性符合率为96.55%,阴性符合率为77.78%,总符合率为92.11%,二者的阳性诊出率经Fisher确切概率法比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);与ICD-10的现场诊断一致性较好(Kappa值=0.751),阳性符合率为93.55%,阴性符合率为85.71%,总符合率为92.11%,阳性诊出率经Fisher确切概率法比较无显著差异(P>0.05).结论 基于结构式访谈纲要的电话访谈法能有效筛查出BZDs依赖患者,且方法简便,值得推广.

Abstract

Objective This study innovatively combined telephone interview using structured interview to reduce time and other related costs on the basis of ensuring effective one-on-one interview,and investigate the effect of telephone interview method based on structured interview outline in benzodiazepines dependence screening in the outpatient department.Methods In this study,average daily maximum dose(ADMD)was used to screen out the suspected drug dependence population in the people who prescribed the benzodiazepines tablets in outpatient clinic,and 40 patients were selected from this population by random number table method for telephone interview based on structured interview outline,and on-site assessment and diagnosis.The patients were evaluated by Benzodiazepines Dependence Questionnaire(BDEPQ)and diagnosed by International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision(ICD-10).Kappa test was used to compare and analyze the consistency among standardized interview outline and doctor's diagnosis and scale evaluation,and Fisher's exact probability method was used to evaluate the differences.Results The telephone interview method based on the structured interview outline had a good consistency with BDEPQ scale evaluation(Kappa=0.773),with a positive coincidence rate of 96.55%,a negative coincidence rate of 77.78%,and a total coincidence rate of 92.11%.There was no significant difference in the positive detection rate between the two groups by Fisher's exact probability method(P>0.05).It is also in good agreement with ICD-10(Kappa=0.751).The positive coincidence rate was 93.55%,the negative coincidence rate was 85.71%,and the total coincidence rate was 92.11%.There was no significant difference in the positive detection rate between them by Fisher's exact probability method(P>0.05).Conclusion The telephone interview method based on structured interview outline can effectively screen out the BZDs-dependent patients,which is a simple method and is worth popularizing.

关键词

电话访谈/苯二氮类药物/门诊处方/药物依赖/结构式访谈

Key words

telephone interview/benzodiazepines/outpatient prescriptions/drug dependence/structured interview

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

山东省医药卫生科技发展计划面上项目(2016WS0398)

济宁医学院教师科研扶持基金精神医学专项(JY2017JS010)

山东省药品不良反应监测中心项目(2022SDADRKY10)

出版年

2024
中国药物依赖性杂志
北京大学,中国毒理学会

中国药物依赖性杂志

CSTPCDCSCD
影响因子:0.629
ISSN:1007-9718
参考文献量24
段落导航相关论文