首页|安罗替尼治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的效果及对生存预后的影响

安罗替尼治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的效果及对生存预后的影响

扫码查看
目的 探究安罗替尼治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的效果及对预后的影响.方法 选取2020年7月至2022年12月秦皇岛市第四医院收治的表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)、间变性淋巴瘤激酶(ALK)或c-ros肉瘤致癌因子-受体酪氨酸激酶(ROS1)阳性、酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)治疗后疾病进展、活动状态(PS)评分≤2分、二次基因检测结果为T790M阴性、处于ⅢB~Ⅳ期的非鳞癌NSCLC患者,根据治疗方法的不同分为化疗组(给予培美曲塞+卡铂注射液化疗方案治疗)和安罗替尼组(给予口服安罗替尼+培美曲塞+卡铂注射液化疗方案治疗),经倾向性匹配评分法(卡钳值0.02)排除性别、年龄等混杂因素,两组各获得46例患者.比较化疗4周期后的实体瘤治疗效果[疾病控制率(DCR)、客观缓解率(ORR)]、随访1年生存情况[无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)]、药物不良反应,比较两组化疗前、化疗4周期后血清肿瘤标志物[细胞角蛋白19片段抗原(CY-FRA21-1)、神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)、癌胚抗原(CEA)]及血清细胞间黏附分子-1(ICAM-1)、热休克蛋白90α(Hsp90α)水平变化情况.结果 治疗4周期后,安罗替尼组DCR(73.91%vs 52.17%)高于化疗组(χ2=4.665,P<0.05),ORR(43.48%vs 34.78%)与化疗组差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.730,P>0.05);随访1年,化疗组PFS为(6.81±1.66)个月,死亡29例,OS为(7.33±1.71)个月;安罗替尼组PFS为(8.17±2.32)个月,死亡19例,OS为(10.56±1.84)个月,安罗替尼组PFS(log rank χ2=8.331,P<0.05)、OS(χ2=8.394,P<0.05)高于化疗组;在治疗期间,安罗替尼组患者蛋白尿和高血压发生率高于化疗组(P<0.05);治疗4个周期后,两组血清肿瘤标志物CY-FRA21-1、NSE、CEA水平及血清ICAM-1、Hsp90α水平均降低(P<0.05),且安罗替尼组[(3.24±0.72)ng·mL-1、(16.65±3.07)ng·mL-1、(13.27±2.49)ng·mL-1、(0.56±0.11)ng·mL-1、(82.67±9.67)ng·mL-1]低于化疗组[(3.88±0.84)ng·mL-1、(18.24±3.12)ng·mL-1、(16.57±2.51)ng·mL-1、(0.64±0.18)ng·mL-1、(89.57±9.24)ng·mL-1](t=3.923、2.464、6.330、2.572、3.499,均P<0.05).结论 安罗替尼在晚期NSCLC患者治疗中效果良好,可控制患者病情发展,延长患者PFS,提高生存质量,抑制肿瘤生长及转移.
Efficacy of anlotinib in treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and its impact on prognosis
Objective To explore the efficacy of anlotinib in treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC)and its impact on prognosis.Methods NSCLC patients with positive epidermal growth factor receptor(EGFR)or anaplasticlymphoma kinase(ALK),first-line chemotherapy failure,physical status(PS)score≤2 points,T790m-negative gene test result and stage ⅢB-Ⅳ treated in the Fourth Hospital of Qinhuangdao from July 2020 to December 2022 were selected as the subjects.According to the treatment methods,the patients were divided into the chemotherapy group(pemetrexed+carboplatin injection second-line chemotherapy regimen)and the anlotinib group(oral anlotinib+pemetrexed+carboplatin injection second-line chemotherapy regimen).The propensity score matching method(caliper=0.02)was used to exclude confounding factors such as gender and age,and 46 patients were obtained in each group.The solid tumor treatment effect(disease control rate(DCR),objective response rate(ORR))after 4 cycles of chemotherapy,the survival status(progression-free survival(PFS),overall survival(OS))and adverse drug reactions after 1 year of follow-up as well as the levels of serum tumor marker(cytokeratin 19 fragment antigen(CY-FRA21-1),neuron-specific enolase(NSE),carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA)),serum intercellular adhesion molecule-1(ICAM-1)and heat shock protein 90α(Hsp90α)before chemotherapy and after 4 cycles of chemotherapy were compared between the two groups.Results After 4 cycles of treatment,the DCR in the anlotinib group was significantly higher than that in the chemotherapy group(73.91%vs 52.17%)(χ2=4.665,P<0.05),and the ORR was not significantly different from that in the chemotherapy group(43.48%vs 34.78%)(χ2=0.730,P>0.05).After follow-up for 1 year,the PFS,the number of dead cases and OS in the chemotherapy group were(6.81±1.66)months,29 cases and(7.33±1.71)months and those in the anlotinib group were(8.17±2.32)months,19 cases and(10.56±1.84)months.The PFS(χ2=8.331,P<0.05)and OS(χ2=8.394,P<0.05)were significantly longer in the chemotherapy group than in the anlotinib group.During treatment,the incidence of proteinuria and hypertension was significantly higher in the anlotinib group than in the chemotherapy group(P<0.05).The levels of serum tumor markers CY-FRA21-1,NSE and CEA and the levels of serum ICAM-1 and Hsp90α in both groups were significantly reduced after 4 treatment cycles(P<0.05),and the levels were significantly lower in the anlotinib group((3.24±0.72)ng·mL-1,(16.65±3.07)ng·mL-1,(13.27±2.49)ng·mL-1,(0.56±0.11)ng·mL-1,(82.67±9.67)ng·mL-1)than in the chemotherapy group((3.88±0.84)ng·mL-1,(18.24±3.12)ng·mL-1,(16.57±2.51)ng·mL-1,(0.64±0.18)ng·mL-1,(89.57±9.24)ng·mL-1)(t=3.923,2.464,6.330,2.572,3.499,all P<0.05).Conclusion Anlotinib has high efficacy in treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC because it can significantly control the disease development,prolong the PFS,improve the quality of life,and inhibit the tumor growth and metastasis.

Advanced non-small cell lung cancerAnlotinibSurvival timeSerum intercellular adhesion molecule-1Heat shock protein 90α

闫绍辉、王栋、徐凯、付晏

展开 >

秦皇岛市第四医院胸部肿瘤科,秦皇岛 066000

晚期NSCLC 安罗替尼 生存时间 血清细胞间黏附分子-1 热休克蛋白90α

秦皇岛市重点研发计划科技支撑项目

202005A025

2024

中国药物应用与监测
中国人民解放军总医院

中国药物应用与监测

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.983
ISSN:1672-8157
年,卷(期):2024.21(5)