首页|分娩方式对初产妇盆底功能和母婴结局的影响

分娩方式对初产妇盆底功能和母婴结局的影响

扫码查看
目的 探讨不同分娩方式下初产妇产后早期盆底功能的差异,观察不同分娩方式对母婴结局的影响,为孕妇对于分娩方式的选择提供参考。方法 选择2020年10月至2021年4月169例于福建医科大学附属漳州市医院产科分娩的初产妇作为研究对象,所有产妇均于产后6~8周复检并行盆底超声检查,根据分娩方式不同分为阴道分娩组(n=71)、剖宫产组(n=98),比较两组产后盆底肌肌力、分娩情况,盆底功能相关临床症状、器官脱垂情况与母婴结局。结果 阴道分娩组盆底肌肌力正常率为43。66%,低于剖宫产组62。24%,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05);阴道分娩组膀胱膨出、肛提肌裂孔扩大均显著高于剖宫产组,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05);阴道分娩组产后2 h出血量、住院时间均低于剖宫产组,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05);两组产妇不良妊娠结局率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0。05)。结论 剖宫产和阴道分娩各有优缺点,剖宫产对初产妇产后早期盆底功能影响较小,而阴道分娩产后2 h出血量更少,住院时间更短,临床上可综合评估母胎情况,合理选择分娩方式。
Impacts of delivery mode on pelvic floor function and maternal and infant outcomes of primiparas
Objective To investigate the differences of pelvic floor function in early postpartum period of primiparas under different delivery modes,and observe the impacts of different delivery modes on maternal and infant outcomes,so as to provide reference for pregnant women to choose delivery modes.Methods A total of 169 primiparas who gave girth in the Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University from October 2020 to April 2021 were selected as the research objects.All primiparas were re-examined 6-8 weeks after delivery and underwent pelvic floor ultrasound examination.According to different delivery modes,they were divided into the vaginal delivery group(n=71)and the cesarean section group(n=98).The pelvic floor muscle strength,delivery situation,clinical symptoms related to pelvic floor function and organ prolapse were compared between the two groups.Results The normal rate of pelvic floor muscle strength in the vaginal delivery group was 43.66%,lower than 62.24%in the cesarean section group,with statistically significant difference(P<0.05).The cystocele and levator ani muscle's hole enlargement in the vaginal delivery group were all significantly higher than those in the cesarean section group,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).The hemorrhage volume and hospitalization time at 2 hours postpartum in the vaginal delivery group were all lower than those in the cesarean section group,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcome between the two groups of parturient(P>0.05).Conclusion The cesarean section group and the vaginal delivery group each has their own advantages and disadvantages,and the cesarean section group has relatively small impact on the pelvic floor function of primipara in the early postpartum period.While 2 hours after delivery,the vaginal delivery group has less hemorrhage volume and shorter hospitalization time.Therefore,it is possible to comprehensively evaluate the maternal and fetal situation and choose a reasonable delivery mode in clinic.

PrimiparaVaginal deliveryCesarean sectionEarly postpartum pelvic floor functionMaternal and infant outcomes

蔡月云、庄雪仪、陈月芬、廖建梅、胡仲任、张宇

展开 >

福建医科大学附属漳州市医院产科,福建漳州 363000

初产妇 阴道分娩 剖宫产 产后早期盆底功能 母婴结局

福建省自然科学基金项目

2020J011295

2024

中国医药科学
海峡两岸医药卫生交流协会 二十一世纪联合创新(北京)医药科学研究院

中国医药科学

影响因子:1.083
ISSN:2095-0616
年,卷(期):2024.14(13)