首页|不同技术应用于乙肝病毒血清学检验中的价值研究

不同技术应用于乙肝病毒血清学检验中的价值研究

扫码查看
目的 探讨酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)、化学发光酶免疫分析法(CLIA)检测技术应用于乙型肝炎(以下简称"乙肝")病毒血清学检验中的价值。方法 选取2022年1-12月六盘水市人民医院收治的高度怀疑乙肝感染患者5836例纳入研究,所有患者均接受实时荧光定量聚合酶链式反应(qPCR)、ELISA、CLIA检测。比较两种检测技术与qPCR检测的检测结果、诊断效能、对乙肝病毒标志物阳性检出率。结果 5836例高度怀疑乙肝感染患者经qPCR检测后,确诊为阳性者3033例、阴性2803例。经CLIA检测诊断为阳性2903例、阴性2933例,其中仅有2790例确诊为乙肝感染患者;经ELISA检测诊断为阳性2921例、阴性2915例,其中仅有2731例确诊为乙肝感染患者。与ELISA相比,CLIA检查的敏感度、特异度、准确度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及对乙肝表面抗原(HBsAg)、乙肝e抗原(HBeAg)的阳性检出率均较高,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05),两种检测方式乙肝表面抗体(HBsAb)、乙肝e抗体(HBeAb)、乙肝核心抗体(HBcAb)的阳性检出率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0。05)。结论 相较于ELISA,CLIA应用于乙肝病毒血清学检验中的效能更佳,且能够有效提升HBsAg、HBeAg阳性检出率,诊断价值更高。
Research on the value of different techniques in serological test of hepatitis B virus
Objective To investigate the value of detection techniques of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA)and chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay(CLIA)in serological test of hepatitis B virus(HBV).Methods A total of 5836 patients with highly suspected HBV infection admitted to the People's Hospital of Liupanshui City from January to December 2022 were selected and included in the research.All patients underwent detections of real-time fluorescence quantitative polymerase chain reaction(qPCR),ELISA and CLIA.The detection results,diagnostic efficiency and positive detection rate of HBV markers between the two detection techniques and qPCR detection were compared.Results After qPCR detection,5836 patients with high suspicion of HBV infection were diagnosed as positive in 3,033 cases and negative in 2803 cases.After CLIA test,2903 cases were diagnosed as positive and 2933 cases as negative,of which only 2790 cases were diagnosed as patients with HBV infection.After ELISA test,2921 cases were diagnosed as positive and 2915 cases as negative,of which only 2731 cases were diagnosed as patients with HBV infection.Compared with ELISA,CLIA had higher sensitivity,specificity,accuracy,positive predictive value,negative predictive value and positive detection rate of hepatitis B surface antigen(HBsAg)and hepatitis B e antigen(HBeAg),with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).There were no statistically significant differences in the positive detection rates of hepatitis B surface antibody(HBsAb),hepatitis B e antibody(HBeAb)and hepatitis B core antibody(HBcAb)between the two detection methods(P>0.05).Conclusion Compared with ELISA,CLIA is more effective in serological test of HBV,and can effectively improve the detection rates of HBsAg and HBeAg,with higher diagnostic value.

Hepatitis B virusSerological testEnzyme-linked immunosorbent assayChemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay

李旺胜、黄平平

展开 >

贵州省六盘水市人民医院检验科,贵州六盘水 553004

乙肝病毒 血清学检验 酶联免疫吸附试验 化学发光酶免疫分析法

2024

中国医药科学
海峡两岸医药卫生交流协会 二十一世纪联合创新(北京)医药科学研究院

中国医药科学

影响因子:1.083
ISSN:2095-0616
年,卷(期):2024.14(13)