首页|论企业自由现金流模型评估市场价值时资本结构的选择——从一行政监管措施决定书谈起

论企业自由现金流模型评估市场价值时资本结构的选择——从一行政监管措施决定书谈起

扫码查看
2020 年 12 月 30 日之前,公开的评估项目中多见采用标的公司自身加权平均贷款利率作为付息债务的资本成本,随着《资产评估专家指引第 12 号—收益法评估企业价值中折现率的测算》出台,越来越多的评估师不再关注标的公司借款利率与LPR的差异,直接选用LPR作为付息债务的资本成本.这一选择受到了监管部门的关注,还有项目因此收到行政监管措施决定书.显然,这本质上还是企业市场价值评估中的资本结构选择的问题,有必要再次探讨.
Further Exploration on the Choice of Capital Structure in Enterprise Market Valuation Based on Free Cash Flow for the Firm——According to the Issuance of a Decision on Administrative Supervision Measures
Prior to December 30,2020,the weighted average loan interest rate of the target company was commonly used as the cost of debt for interest payments in public valuation projects.With the introduction of Advice from Experts on Asset Valuation Operations No.12-Calculation of Discount Rates in the Income Approach for Enterprise Valuation,an growing number of appraisers have shifted their focus away from the difference between the target company's borrowing rate and the Loan Prime Rate(LPR),and opted to directly use the LPR as the cost of debt for interest payments.This new trend has drawn regulatory attention,and certain projects have received Decision on Administrative Regulatory Measures.Obviously,this issue relates to the choice of capital structure in enterprise market valuation and warrants further exploration.

capital costit own capital structureaverage capital structure

邓先军

展开 >

上海申威资产评估有限公司,上海 200083

资本成本 自身资本结构 平均资本结构

2024

中国资产评估
中国资产评估协会

中国资产评估

CSTPCDCHSSCD
影响因子:0.164
ISSN:1007-0265
年,卷(期):2024.(5)
  • 7