为探究室内全人工光照环境下,3种补光灯具对多肉植物橙梦露生长的影响,本试验以多肉植物橙梦露为试验材料,用3种不同的补光灯具,通过T1、T2、T3处理(T1为红蓝光子数比7∶1的100 W LED灯条,悬挂高度0.3 m,光照强度500 μmol/(m2·s),T2为红蓝光子数比7∶1的150 W LED灯筒,悬挂高度0.3 m,光照强度1000 μmol/(m2·s),T3为红蓝光子数比7∶1的630 W陶瓷金卤灯,悬挂高度1.2 m,光照强度150 μmol/(m2·s),同时通过观察比较多肉植物橙梦露生长发育过程的颜色及形态变化情况来判断多肉品质.研究结果表明,与T3处理相比,T1和T2处理后的多肉植物橙梦露转色效果更好,饱满度更高,生长形态更好.而T1和T2处理后的多肉植物橙梦露在转色和形态上没有明显区别.
Effects of Different Filling-light Fixtures on Growth of Succulent Plant Echeveria Monroe
In order to explore the effect of three fixtures for filling light on the color conversion of succulent plant echeveria monroe under indoor artificial light environment,this experiment took succulent plant echeveria monroe as experimental material and treated with three different light fixtures T1,T2 and T3(T1:100 W LED light strip,hanging 0.3 m high,R:B=7∶1,light intensity=500μmol/(m2·s).T2:150 W LED downlight,hanging 0.3m high,R∶B=7∶1,lightintensity=1000μmol/(m2·s).T3:630 W ceramic metal halide lamp,hanging 1.2m high,R∶B=7∶1,light intensity=150μmol/(m2·s).We observed and compared the color and morphological changes of echeveria monroe during growth and development to judge the succulent quality.The results showed that T1 and T2 treatments had better color conversion,higher plumpness and better morphology thanT3 treatment.However,there was no significant difference in color conversion and morphology between T1 and T2 treatments.
fixtures for filling lightsucculent plantecheveria MonroeLEDceramic metal halide lampquality