首页|老年重型颅脑损伤患者1047例诊治预后分析

老年重型颅脑损伤患者1047例诊治预后分析

扫码查看
目的 分析影响老年重型颅脑损伤患者预后的因素.方法 回顾性分析 1997 年 1 月至 2021年 12 月天津市第一中心医院神经外科收治的 1 047 例老年重型颅脑损伤患者的临床资料,包括性别、格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)、致伤因素和损伤类型、入院后的治疗情况;根据格拉斯哥预后评分(GOS)以状态良好、轻残、重残为治疗有效,持续植物状态、死亡为治疗无效;采用单因素及多因素Logistic回归分析影响重型颅脑损伤患者预后的危险因素.结果 1 047 例患者中治疗有效 612 例(占 58.45%),治疗无效 435 例(占 41.55%);存在颅内血肿患者的治疗无效率明显高于无颅内血肿者[53.8%(342/636)比 22.6%(93/411)],复合损伤患者的治疗无效率明显高于单纯颅脑损伤者[62.4%(249/399)比 28.7%(186/648)],GCS评分为 3~5 分患者的治疗无效率明显高于GCS评分 6~8 分者[64.8%(243/375)比 28.6%(192/672)],差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05);男性和女性、是否存在颅骨骨折患者治疗无效率比较差异均无统计学意义[分别为 42.2%(294/696)比40.2%(141/351)和 37.9%(69/182)比 42.3%(366/865),均P>0.05].多因素Logistic回归分析显示,颅内血肿[优势比(OR)=2.266,95%可信区间(95%CI)为1.656~3.103]、损伤类型(OR=1.816,95%CI为1.279~2.578)、GCS评分(OR=2.262,95%CI为1.582~3.234)是影响老年重型颅脑损伤患者预后的独立危险因素(均P<0.05).结论 为降低致残率和病死率,应重视影响老年重型颅脑损伤患者预后的因素,减少颅内血肿和多发性损伤的发生以及关注GCS评分一定程度上能改善患者预后.
Analysis of the risk factors of prognosis for severe craniocerebral injury in the elderly
Objective To analyze the factors affecting the prognosis of elderly patients with severe craniocerebral injury.Methods Retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 1 047 elderly patients with severe craniocerebral injury admitted to the department of neurosurgery of Tianjin First Central Hospital from January 1997 to December 2021,including gender,Glasgow coma scale(GCS),injury factors and injury types,and treatment after admission.According to Glasgow outcome scale(GOS),good condition,mild disability,severe disability are considered as effective treatment,while persistent vegetative state and death are considered as ineffective treatment.Univariate and multivariate Logistic analysis of risk factors affecting the prognosis of patients with severe craniocerebral injury.Results Among the 1 047 patients,612(58.45%)were effectively treated,and 435(41.55%)were ineffective.The inefficiency of treatment in patients with intracranial hematoma was significantly higher than that of patients without intracranial hematoma[53.8%(342/636)vs.22.6%(93/411)],the treatment inefficiency of patients with complex injuries was significantly higher than that of patients with simple craniocerebral injury[62.4%(249/399)vs.28.7%(186/648)],the treatment inefficiency of patients with GCS scores of 3-5 was significantly higher than that of patients with GCS scores of 6-8[64.8%(243/375)vs.28.6%(192/672)],all differences were statistically significant(all P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the treatment inefficiency between males and females,or between patients with and without skull fractures[42.2%(294/696)vs.40.2%(141/351)and 37.9%(69/182)vs.42.3%(366/865),respectively,all P>0.05].Multivariate Logistic analysis showed that intracranial hematoma[odds ratio(OR)= 2.266,95%confidence interval(95%CI)was 1.656-3.103],type of injury(OR = 1.816,95%CI was 1.279-2.578)and GCS score(OR = 2.262,95%CI was 1.582-3.234)were independent prognostic factors for elderly patients with craniocerebral injury(all P<0.05).Conclusion To reduce the morbidity and mortality,it is crucial to address the factors that impact the prognosis of elderly patients with severe craniocerebral injury,by reducing the occurrence of intracranial hematoma and multiple injuries,as well as closely monitoring GCS scores,patient outcomes can be improved to a certain extent.

Craniocerebral injuryPrognosisFactor

郑首学、鲁宏伟、常斌鸽、李牧

展开 >

天津市第一中心医院神经外科,天津 300192

颅脑损伤 预后 因素

2024

中国中西医结合急救杂志
中国中西医结合学会

中国中西医结合急救杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.925
ISSN:1008-9691
年,卷(期):2024.31(1)
  • 13