首页|茯苓四逆汤对脓毒性心肌病患者心功能的影响

茯苓四逆汤对脓毒性心肌病患者心功能的影响

扫码查看
目的 探讨茯苓四逆汤对脓毒性心肌病(SIC)患者心功能的影响.方法 选择 2021 年 1 月至2022 年 12 月北京中医药大学深圳医院(龙岗)重症监护病房(ICU)收治的 60 例SIC患者作为研究对象,按随机数字表法将患者分为对照组和治疗组,每组 30 例.两组均给予常规治疗,治疗组在常规治疗基础上加用茯苓四逆汤(组成:茯苓 30 g,干姜 12 g,人参 10 g,制附子 12 g,炙甘草 15g),每剂煎煮成 200 mL,每日 1 剂,分 3 次服用;两组疗程均为 8d.记录两组血管活性药物使用时间、ICU和总住院时间、28d病死率;观察两组中医症状积分、序贯器官衰竭评分(SOFA)、急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分Ⅱ(APACHE Ⅱ)、降钙素原(PCT)、动脉血氧合指数(PaO2/FiO2)、血乳酸(Lac)、心型脂肪酸结合蛋白(H-FABP)、心肌肌钙蛋白Ⅰ(cTnⅠ)、N末端脑钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)、左室射血分数(LVEF)、左室收缩期末内径(LVESD)、左室舒张期末内径(LVEDD)、二尖瓣口舒张早期血流速度峰值(E)、二尖瓣口舒张晚期血流速度峰值(A)、E/A比值及三尖瓣瓣环收缩期位移(TAPSE)变化.结果 治疗组血管活性药物使用时间、ICU停留时间、总住院时间均较对照组明显缩短[血管活性药物使用时间(d):4.47±2.16 比 6.32±3.23,ICU停留时间(d):9.18±3.32 比 12.25±4.39,总住院时间(d):13.58±5.14 比 17.13±6.65,均P<0.05];治疗组和对照组 28d病死率比较差异无统计学意义[20.00%(6/30)比 43.33%(13/30),P>0.05].两组治疗后APACHE Ⅱ评分、SOFA评分均较治疗前明显下降,治疗组下降更明显,且以治疗 8d两组对比最为显著[APACHE Ⅱ评分(分):13.71±3.37 比 16.21±3.82,SOFA评分(分):3.24±0.85 比 4.13±1.56,均P<0.05];两组治疗后中医症状积分亦均较治疗前明显下降,以治疗组下降更明显(分:治疗 3d为 26.25±6.64 比 29.43±6.83,治疗 5d为 21.42±4.22 比 24.81±4.65,治疗 8d为 14.43±3.45比 17.58±4.56,均P<0.05);两组治疗后PCT、Lac、H-FABP均较治疗前下降,而PaO2/FiO2 均较治疗前明显升高,治疗组较对照组变化更显著,尤以治疗 8d对比最明显[PCT(μg/L):2.47±1.18 比 3.54±1.51,Lac(mmol/L):1.86±0.41 比 2.33±0.64,H-FABP(μg/L):4.67±1.22 比 6.34±1.55,PaO2/FiO2(mmHg,1 mmHg≈0.133 kPa):297.63±53.92 比 265.44±48.38,均P<0.05].两组治疗后cTnI、NT-proBNP、LVESD、LVEDD先升高后降低,LVEF、E/A比值、TAPSE先下降后升高,于治疗 8d达到谷值或峰值,且治疗组上述指标与对照组比较差异均有统计学意义[cTnI(μg/L):0.15±0.06 比 0.24±0.13,NT-proBNP(ng/L):825.43±164.73 比 1234.40±243.37,LVESD(mm):48.36±4.46 比 52.64±5.15,LVEDD(mm):38.39±3.22 比 41.87±2.65,LVEF:0.55±0.08比 0.50±0.07,E/A比值:1.23±0.12 比 1.12±0.08,TAPSE(mm):22.45±2.23 比 20.55±2.66,均P<0.05].结论 茯苓四逆汤能改善SIC患者中医证候,提高心功能,减轻心肌损伤,缩短住院时间,值得临床推广.
Effect of Fuling Sini decoction on cardiac function in patients with septic cardiomyopathy
Objective To explore the effect of Fuling Sini decoction on cardiac function in patients with sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy(SIC).Methods Sixty SIC patients admitted to the department of intensive care unit(ICU)of Shenzhen Hospital(Longgang)of Beijing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine(TCM)from January 2021 to December 2022 were divided into a control group and a treatment group using a random number table method,with 30 patients in each group.Both groups received routine treatment,and the treatment group received Fuling Sini decoction(consisting of Poria cocos 30 g,Dry ginger 12 g,Ginseng 10 g,Prepared aconite 12 g,and Roasted licorice 15 g)based on routine treatment.Each dose was decocted into 200 mL,1 dose per day,divided into 3 times.Both groups of treatments lasted for 8 days.The use time of vasoactive drugs,ICU stay time and total hospital stay time,the 28-day mortality of two groups were recorded.TCM symptom score,sequential organ failure assessment(SOFA),acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ(APACHE Ⅱ),procalcitonin(PCT),arterial oxygenation index(PaO2/FiO2),blood lactic acid(Lac),cardiac troponin Ⅰ(cTnⅠ),N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide(NT-proBNP),heart type-fatty acid binding protein(H-FABP),left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF),left ventricular end-systolic diameter(LVESD),left ventricular end-diastolic diameter(LVEDD),mitral orifice early diastolic blood flow velocity(E),mitral orifice late diastolic blood flow velocity(A),and E/A ratio and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion(TAPSE)were observed.Results The use time of vasoactive drugs,ICU stay time,and total hospital stay time in the treatment group were significantly shorter than those in the control group[use time of vasoactive drugs(days):4.47±2.16 vs.6.32±3.23,ICU stay time(days):9.18±3.32 vs.12.25±4.39,total hospital stay time(days):13.58±5.14 vs.17.13±6.65,all P<0.05].There was no statistically significant difference in the 28-day mortality between the treatment group and control group[20.00%(6/30)vs.43.33%(13/30),P>0.05].After treatment,the APACHE Ⅱ score and SOFA score in both groups decreased compared to before treatment,with a more significant decrease in the treatment group.The comparison between the two groups was most significant after 8 days of treatment(APACHE Ⅱ score:13.71±3.37 vs.16.21±3.82,SOFA score:3.24±0.85 vs.4.13±1.56,all P<0.05).After treatment,both groups showed a significant decrease in TCM syndrome scores compared to before treatment,with a more significant decrease in the treatment group(26.25±6.44 vs.29.43±6.83 on 3 days of treatment,21.42±4.22 vs.24.81±4.65 on 5 days of treatment,14.43±3.45 vs.17.58±4.56 on 8 days of treatment,all P<0.05).After treatment,PCT,Lac,and H-FABP in both groups decreased compared to before treatment,while PaO2/FiO2 increased,the treatment group showed more significant changes compared to the control group,especially after 8 days of treatment[PCT(μg/L):2.47±1.18 vs.3.54±1.51,Lac(mmol/L):1.86±0.41 vs.2.33±0.64,H-FABP(μg/L):4.67±1.22 vs.6.34±1.55,PaO2/FiO2(mmHg,1 mmHg≈0.133 kPa):297.63±53.92 vs.265.44±48.38,all P<0.05].After treatment,cTnI,NT-proBNP,LVESD,and LVEDD first increased and then decreased in both groups,while LVEF,E/A ratio and TAPSE first decreased and then increased,reaching a valley or peak at 8 days of treatment.Moreover,the above indicators showed statistical significance compared to the control group[cTnI(μg/L):0.15±0.06 vs.0.24±0.13,NT-proBNP(ng/L):825.43±164.73 vs.1234.40±243.37,LVESD(mm):48.36±4.46 vs.52.64±5.15,LVEDD(mm):38.39±3.22 vs.41.87±2.65,LVEF:0.55±0.08 vs.0.50±0.07,E/A ratio:1.23±0.12 vs.1.12±0.08,TAPSE(mm):22.45±2.23 vs.20.55±2.66,all P<0.05].Conclusion Fuling Sini Tang can improve the TCM syndrome of SIC patients,improve heart function,reduce myocardial injury,and shorten hospitalization time,making it a treatment worthy of clinical promotion.

Sepsis-induced cardiomyopathyCardiac functionFuling Sini decoction

王评、黄壑霏、彭晓洪、黄亚秀、黄永莲

展开 >

北京中医药大学深圳医院(龙岗)重症医学科,广东深圳 518172

脓毒性心肌病 心功能 茯苓四逆汤

广东省中医药局科研项目

20211349

2024

中国中西医结合急救杂志
中国中西医结合学会

中国中西医结合急救杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.925
ISSN:1008-9691
年,卷(期):2024.31(3)
  • 11