首页|基于二维摄影测量脸型的口罩适合性检验分析

基于二维摄影测量脸型的口罩适合性检验分析

扫码查看
目的 分析各种品牌医用防护口罩的适合性检验通过率,探讨快速根据头面尺寸匹配医用防护口罩的方法.方法 选择天津市定点医院的 202 名医务人员作为研究对象,对A、B、C、D、E 5 种品牌口罩采用气溶胶凝结核计数器进行定量适合性检验.采用二维摄影测量获取研究对象形态面长及面宽,对应颜面分栏将研究对象脸型归为#1~#10 类.比较各颜面分区研究对象口罩通过率、不同品牌口罩测试通过率、不同脸型研究对象各种口罩测试通过率的差异.结果 共有 202 名测试人员参加本研究.根据颜面分栏,其中#1 类脸型占比最多[43.6%(88/202)],其次为#3 类脸型[18.2%(37/202)],研究对象多为#1、#2、#3、#4 类脸型,共 176 名,占 87.1%.202 名测试者共进行 914 次测试,通过次数 678 次,整体口罩通过率为 74.18%.A、B、C3 种品牌口罩通过率明显高于D、E口罩[87.03%(161/185)、85.57%(166/194)、82.02%(146/178)比 62.98%(114/181)、51.70%(91/176),均P<0.05],头戴式可调节口罩通过率明显高于不可调节口罩[79.54%(587/738)比 51.70%(91/176),P<0.05],B品牌口罩对<#1~#5 类脸型的适合因数(FF)明显高于#6~#10 类脸型[200(163,200)比 132(86,200),P<0.05].结论 通过二维摄影测量可以快速获得研究对象面部信息并匹配相应口罩,医院在配置时可根据医务人员脸型分区占比情况匹配测试通过率较高的口罩.在口罩选择中,尽量选择头戴式可调节口罩.
Analysis of mask fit testing based on two-dimensional photographic measurement of facial shape
Objective To investigate the pass rates of fit tests for various brands of medical protective masks and to explore methods for quickly matching these masks based on their head and face dimensions.Methods A total of 202 medical staff from designated hospitals in Tianjin were selected as subjects.Quantitative fit tests were conducted on 5 brands of masks(A,B,C,D,and E)using an aerosol condensation nucleus counter.Two-dimensional photographic measurement was used to obtain the face length and width of the subjects,categorizing them into face types#1 to#10.The pass rates of masks across different face zones,brands,and face types were compared.Results A total of 202 testers participated in this study.According to the guidelines,face type#1 was the most common[43.6%(88/202)],followed by face type#3[18.2%(37/202)].The majority of subjects were categorized as face types#1,#2,#3,and#4,totaling 176 subjects(87.1%).A total of 914 tests were conducted,with 678 passes,resulting in an overall mask pass rate of 74.18%.The pass rates of masks A,B,and C were significantly higher than those of masks D and E[87.03%(161/185),85.57%,(166/194),82.02%(146/178)vs.62.98%(114/181),51.70%(91/176),all P<0.05].The pass rate of adjustable head-mounted masks was significantly higher than that of non-adjustable masks[79.54%(587/738)vs.51.70%(91/176),P<0.05].The fit factor(FF)for mask B in face types#1 to#5 was significantly higher than that in face types#6 to#10[200(163,200)vs.132(86,200),P<0.05].Conclusions Two-dimensional photographic measurement can quickly obtain facial information of the subjects and match the corresponding masks.Hospitals can match masks with higher test pass rates according to the proportion of face types among medical staff.When selecting masks,preference should be given to adjustable head-mounted masks.

Medical staffProtective maskFitness test

韩晶、杨万杰、康波、史丽霞、贾敬波、王湘、于维莉

展开 >

天津大学海河医院医务科,天津 300350

天津市呼吸疾病研究所,天津 300350

天津大学海河医院重症医学科,天津 300350

国家超级计算天津中心,天津 300457

天津大学海河医院结核科,天津 300350

天津大学海河医院感染管理科,天津 300350

展开 >

医务人员 防护性口罩 适合性检验

天津市科技计划天津市科技计划天津市津南区科技计划天津市医学重点学科(专科)建设项目

23JCZDJC0097023JCQNJC0149020230111TJYXZDXK-063B

2024

中国中西医结合急救杂志
中国中西医结合学会

中国中西医结合急救杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.925
ISSN:1008-9691
年,卷(期):2024.31(3)
  • 8