中国中西医结合外科杂志2024,Vol.30Issue(4) :466-470.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-6948.2024.04.006

机器人辅助下与腹腔镜下修补术治疗Ⅳ型食管裂孔疝的效果比较

Evaluation of effect of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic for type Ⅳ esophageal hiatal hernia repair

刘韦金 王玉 李頔 王宏磊 吴瑜
中国中西医结合外科杂志2024,Vol.30Issue(4) :466-470.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-6948.2024.04.006

机器人辅助下与腹腔镜下修补术治疗Ⅳ型食管裂孔疝的效果比较

Evaluation of effect of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic for type Ⅳ esophageal hiatal hernia repair

刘韦金 1王玉 2李頔 2王宏磊 2吴瑜2
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 天津医科大学研究生院(天津 300070);天津医科大学附属南开医院(天津 300100);天津市急腹症器官损伤与中西医修复重点实验室(天津 300100);天津市中西医结合急腹症研究所(天津 300100)
  • 2. 天津医科大学附属南开医院(天津 300100);天津市急腹症器官损伤与中西医修复重点实验室(天津 300100);天津市中西医结合急腹症研究所(天津 300100)
  • 折叠

摘要

目的:探讨机器人辅助下食管裂孔疝修补术与传统腹腔镜下食管裂孔疝修补术治疗Ⅳ型食管裂孔疝的安全性与治疗效果.方法:回顾性分析2020年1月—2023年11月在天津市南开医院胃肠外科三行食管裂孔疝修补术的20例Ⅳ型食管裂孔疝患者的临床资料.根据手术方式不同,分为传统腹腔镜组和机器人组,比较两组围手术期情况、治疗效果与术后并发症情况.结果:机器人组8例,其中男性3例,女性5例;腹腔镜组12例,其中男性4例,女性8例;两组在性别、年龄、体质量指数方面无明显差异;机器人组患者术前胃食管反流问卷量表(GERD-Q)量表评分为(10.00±3.38)分,术后为(1.88±0.84)分,前后差值为(8.13±3.48)分,腹腔镜组患者术前GERD-Q评分为(9.50±3.50)分,术后为2(1,3)分,差值为(7.42±3.55)分,两组差值对比无统计学差异;围手术期方面,所有手术均顺利完成,未有中转开腹或改变手术方式.两组患者在手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、术后进食时间、术后排气时间方面,无统计学差异.术后并发症方面,腹腔镜组有1例患者在术后1个月后因出现吞咽困难,疝复发再次入院行手术治疗,其余患者在术后1年随访中,均未出现复发,两组术后并发症无统计学差异.结论:机器人辅助手术治疗Ⅳ型食管裂孔疝的安全性与治疗效果满意,具备良好的未来应用前景.

Abstract

Objective To investigate the safety and therapeutic efficacy of robot-assisted esophageal hiatal hernia repair versus conventional laparoscopic esophageal hiatal hernia repair for type Ⅳ esophageal hiatal hernia.Methods The clinical data of 20 patients who underwent esophageal hiatal hernia repair from January 2020 to November 2023 at the Gastrointestinal Surgery Department 3 of Tianjin Nankai Hospital were retrospectively analyzed.They were divided into laparoscopic group(n=12)and robotic group(n=8)according to the surgical procedures.perioperative conditions,treatment outcomes and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.Results In the robotic group,there were 8 patients,include 3 males and 5 females;in the laparoscopic group,there were 12 patients:4 males and 8 females;there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of gender,age,and BMI.The preoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire(GERD-Q)score in the robotic group is(10.00±3.38)and the postoperative score is(1.88±0.84),with a pre/post difference of(8.13±3.48).and for the laparoscopic group,the preoperative GERD-Q score was(9.50±3.50)and the postoperative score was 2(1,3),with a pre/post difference of(7.42±3.55),which showed no statistically significant difference in the comparisons.In terms of perioperative period,all surgical procedures were successfully completed,without conversion to laparotomy or change in operation mode.There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of operation time,intraoperative bleeding,postoperative hospitalization time,postoperative fluid feeding time,and postoperative ventilating time.And for postoperative complications,only one patient in the laparoscopic group was readmitted to the hospital for surgery one month after the operation due to dysphagia and hernia recurrence,while the rest of the patients did not experience recurrence during the one-year postoperative follow-up,and there was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of postoperative complications.Conclusion Robot-assisted surgery for the treatment of type Ⅳ esophageal hiatal hernia is satisfactory in terms of safety and therapeutic efficacy,and has good prospects for future application.

关键词

达芬奇机器人/腹腔镜/Ⅳ型食管裂孔疝

Key words

Da Vinci robot surgical system/laparoscopy/type Ⅳ hiatal hernia of the esophagus

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

天津市卫健委中医药重点领域项目(2020009)

天津南开-金域合作专项(NKYY-IIT-2022-009-6)

天津市卫健委中医中西医结合项目(2023166)

出版年

2024
中国中西医结合外科杂志
中国中西医结合学会 天津市中西医结合急腹症研究所

中国中西医结合外科杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.918
ISSN:1007-6948
段落导航相关论文