首页|丙泊酚在胃/肠镜检查中的临床综合评价

丙泊酚在胃/肠镜检查中的临床综合评价

扫码查看
目的:从安全性、有效性、经济性、创新性、适宜性、可及性6个维度对丙泊酚的国产品种进行评价,为临床内镜检查麻醉诱导剂的药物遴选提供依据.方法:采用文献调查法和问卷调研法构建丙泊酚的临床综合评价指标体系.采用系统文献综述、Meta分析、真实世界研究及其他相关资料分析方法,对研究品(国产丙泊酚:迪施乐)与对照品(进口丙泊酚:静安)进行各维度的定性及定量分析比较.结果:安全性方面,Meta分析结果显示,两组患者麻醉前后的生命体征变化比较无统计学差异(P>0.05);真实世界研究结果显示,研究组患者低血压及注射痛的发生率均低于对照组(P<0.05).有效性方面,Meta分析结果显示,两组患者麻醉诱导时间和患者苏醒时间比较均无统计学差异(P>0.05);真实世界研究结果显示,研究组患者苏醒快、内镜医生操作满意度高(P<0.05).经济性方面,研究品治疗所需的药品费用低于对照品.创新性方面,研究品具有剂型创新性.适宜性方面,研究品的制备工艺、辅料选择较适宜,但有效期适宜性弱于对照品.可及性方面,研究品具有可获得的政策优势,但市场占有率不及对照品.结论:丙泊酚注射液的国产品种在安全性、有效性、经济性、创新性4个维度具有良好表现,仅在有效期适宜性及市场占有率方面弱于对照品,其临床综合价值较高,可为医疗机构用药目录遴选及国家药物政策完善提供参考依据.
Clinical Comprehensive Evaluation of Propofol in Gastroscopy/Colonoscopy
Objective:To evaluate the safety,efficacy,economy,innovation,appropriateness and accessibility of domestic propofol injection in order to provide evidence for the selection of anesthetic induction agents for clinical endoscopy.Methods:Literature survey and questionnaire investigation were used to construct clinical comprehensive evaluation index system for propofol.Systematic literature review,Meta-analysis,real-world studies and other relevant data analysis methods were used to qualitatively and quantitatively compare the investigational drug (domestic/generic:Dishile) and the reference listed drug (imported/originator:Jingan).Results:In terms of safety,Meta-analysis showed that there was no statistically significant difference in the changes of vital signs between the two groups before and after anesthesia (P>0.05).The results of the real-world study showed that the incidence of hypotension and injection pain in the study group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05).In terms of efficacy,Meta-analysis showed that there was no statistically significant difference in anesthesia induction time and recovery time between the two groups (P>0.05).The results of the real-world study showed that the patients in the study group had shorter awakening time and higher endoscopist satisfaction (P<0.05).In terms of economy,the cost of the investigational product was lower than that of the reference listed drug.In terms of innovation,the investigational product is innovative in dosage form.In terms of appropriateness,the preparation process and excipient selection of the investigational product were appropriate,but while its shelf life was less appropriate than the reference listed drug.In terms of accessibility,the investigational product has an available policy advantage,but a lower market share than the reference listed drug.Conclusion:The domestic varieties of propofol injection have good performance in the four dimensions of safety,effectiveness,economy and innovation,but is less appropriate in terms of shelf life and less market share than the reference listed drug.The clinical comprehensive value of the domestic propofol injection is higher,which can provide reference for the selection of drug list in medical institutions and the improvement of national drug policy.

propofolgastroscopy/colonoscopyclinical comprehensive evaluationliterature researchMeta analysisreal-world research

侯佳、张梦宇、丛日楠、嵇翔、王中师、李进峰

展开 >

山东大学附属威海市立医院药剂科,威海264200

丙泊酚 胃/肠镜 临床综合评价 文献研究 Meta分析 真实世界研究

2024

中国合理用药探索
中国执业药师协会

中国合理用药探索

影响因子:0.62
ISSN:2096-3327
年,卷(期):2024.21(11)