首页|错位固定大骨瓣减压术与标准去骨瓣减压术治疗儿童创伤性颅内压增高的疗效比较

错位固定大骨瓣减压术与标准去骨瓣减压术治疗儿童创伤性颅内压增高的疗效比较

扫码查看
目的 比较错位固定大骨瓣减压术与标准去骨瓣减压术治疗儿童创伤性颅内压增高的疗效.方法 采用回顾性队列研究分析2017年8月至2023年3月苏州大学附属儿童医院和徐州市儿童医院收治的33例创伤性颅内压增高患儿的临床资料,其中男25例,女8例;年龄2~17岁[(5.9± 3.3)岁].入院时格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)为(6.3±2.1)分,其中3~5分13例,6~8分15例,9~12分5例.19例行错位固定大骨瓣减压术(错位骨瓣组),14例行标准去骨瓣减压术(去骨瓣组).错位骨瓣组18例、去骨瓣组13例行有创颅内压监测.比较两组手术时间,术毕当时,术后24h、72h及7d的颅内压,术后6个月内颅骨修补/成形术比率,术后3、6个月及末次随访时格拉斯哥预后评分(GOS),术后6个月内并发症(硬膜下积液、脑积水、切口感染/坏死、癫痫)发生率.结果 患儿均获随访6~67个月[10(6,45)个月].两组手术时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).术毕当时,术后24h、72h及7 d的两组颅内压数值差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).术后6个月内错位骨瓣组无骨瓣吸收等问题,颅骨修补/成形术比率为0.0%(0/19),低于去骨瓣组的78.5%(11/14)(P<0.01).术后3、6个月及末次随访时两组GOS差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).错位骨瓣组术后硬膜下积液发生率为0.0%(0/19),低于去骨瓣组的28.6%(4/14)(P<0.05);两组术后脑积水、切口感染/坏死及癫痫发生率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 与标准去骨瓣减压术相比,错位固定大骨瓣减压术治疗儿童创伤性颅内压增高能够避免颅骨修补/成形术、降低硬膜下积液发生率.
Comparative efficacy of hinge decompressive craniotomy with large bone flaps and standard decompressive craniectomy in the treatment of increased intracranial pressure following trauma in children
Objective To compare the efficacy of hinge decompressive craniotomy with large bone flaps and standard decompressive craniectomy in the treatment of increased intracranial pressure following trauma in children.Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 33 children with increased intracranial pressure following trauma,who were admitted to Children's Hospital of Soochow University and Xuzhou Children's Hospital from August 2017 to March 2023,including 25 males and 8 females;aged 2-17 years[(5.9±3.3)years].Glasgow Coma Scale(GCS)score on admission was(6.3±2.l)points,including 3-5 points in 13 patients,6-8 points in 15,and 9-12 points in 5.Of them,19 patients were treated with hinge decompressive craniotomy with large bone flaps(hinge bone flap group)and 14 patients with standard decompressive craniectomy(bone flap group).Invasive intracranial pressure monitoring was performed on 18 patients in the hinge bone flap group and 13 patients in the bone flap group.The operation time,intracranial pressure immediately,at 24,72 hours and 7 days after surgery,proportion of children undergoing cranioplasty/plastic surgery within 6 months after surgery,Glasgow Outcome Scale(GOS)at 3,6 months after surgery and at the last follow-up,and the incidences of complications at 6 months after surgery including subdural effusion,hydrocephalus,infection/necrosis of incisions and epilepsy were compared between the two groups.Results All the patients were followed up for 6-67 months[10(6,45)months].There was no significant difference in the operation time between the two groups(P>0.05).There was no significant difference in the intracranial pressure immediately,at 24 hours,72 hours and 7 days after surgery(P>0.05).Within 6 months after surgery,none of the children in the hinge bone flap group had problems of bone flap resorption,etc and the proportion of children undergoing cranioplasty/plastic surgery was 0.0%(0/19),which was lower than that of the bone flap group[78.5%(11/14)](P<0.01).There was no significant difference in GOS scores of the two groups at 3,6 months after surgery or at the last follow up(P>0.05).The incidence of postoperative subdural effusion in the hinge bone flap group was 0.0%(0/19),which was lower than that of the bone flap group[28.6%(4/14)](P<0.05).There were no significant differences in the incidences of postoperative hydrocephalus,incision infection/necrosis or epilepsy between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Compared with standard decompressive craniectomy,hinge decompressive craniotomy with large bone flaps can avoid the cranioplasty/plastic surgery and reduce the incidence of subdural effusion in the treatment of increased intracranial pressure following trauma in children.

Brain injuriesDecompression,surgicalChildren

韩勇、李璐、王杭州、王勇强、杨天权、徐金、朱炳鑫、李政委、陈民

展开 >

苏州大学附属儿童医院神经外科,苏州 215025

徐州市儿童医院神经外科,徐州 221000

脑损伤 减压术,外科 儿童

苏州市科技发展计划(2021)

SKY2021050

2024

中华创伤杂志
中华医学会

中华创伤杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.425
ISSN:1001-8050
年,卷(期):2024.40(4)
  • 26