首页|肺电阻抗断层成像技术引导呼气末正压在创伤性脑损伤合并急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者机械通气中的应用效果

肺电阻抗断层成像技术引导呼气末正压在创伤性脑损伤合并急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者机械通气中的应用效果

扫码查看
目的 比较肺电阻抗断层成像(EIT)技术与传统呼气末正压(PEEP)-吸入气氧浓度(FiO2)表法引导PEEP在创伤性脑损伤(TBI)合并急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者机械通气中的应用效果.方法 采用回顾性队列研究分析2020年7月至2022年12月郑州大学附属郑州中心医院收治的80例TBI合并ARDS患者的临床资料,其中男42例,女38例;年龄29~59岁[(42.4±7.8)岁].格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)3~12分[(7.7±2.2)分].ARDS分级:轻度33例,中度26例,重度21例.均按肺保护性通气策略行机械通气治疗,42例采用EIT技术引导PEEP(EIT组),38例采用传统PEEP-FiO2表法引导PEEP(传统组).比较两组机械通气治疗后12 h,1、3、5 d的最佳PEEP,以及在各自最佳PEEP下的呼吸力学[驱动压(△P)、静态顺应性(CSt)、机械能(MP)]、肺气体交换[动脉血pH值、动脉二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)、氧合指数(P/F)]、气体分布[不均一性指数(GI)、感兴趣区(ROI)1~4]、血流动力学[心率(HR)、中心静脉压(CVP)、平均动脉压(MAP)]、脑灌注情况[颅内压(ICP)、局部脑氧饱和度(rScO2)分级];治疗结局(机械通气时间、呼吸机相关性肺损伤(VILI)发生率、ICU住院时间、6个月生存率).结果 患者均获随访6个月.EIT组在机械通气治疗后12h,1、3、5d引导的最佳PEEP分别为(7.4±1.0)cm、(8.2±1.2)cm、(9.8±0.8)cm、(8.4±0.7)cm,均高于传统组的(7.0±1.0)cm、(7.6±1.0)cm、(9.0±0.6)cm、(7.2±0.5)cm(P<0.05或0.01).在各自最佳PEEP下,治疗后 12 h,1、3、5 d EIT组 △P分别为(7.1±1.3)cmH2O、(7.7±1.3)cmH2O、(9.5±1.1)cmH2O、(6.1±1.3)cmH2O,均低于传统组的(8.9±1.3)cmH2O、(10.5±1.3)cmH2O、(11.2±1.2)cmH2O、(8.7±1.2)cmH2O(P<0.05 或0.01);EIT 组 CSt分别为(51.5±4.2)ml/cmH2O、(52.9±4.6)ml/cmH2O、(55.1±4.3)ml/cmH2O、(57.5± 3.6)ml/cmH2O,均高于传统组的(46.8±3.9)ml/cmH2O、(47.6±4.4)ml/cmH2O、(49.9±4.3)ml/cmH2O、(53.3±3.6)ml/cmH2O(P<0.05);EIT组 MP分别为(7.9±1.8)J/min、(8.8±1.3)J/min、(10.6±1.3)J/min、(7.8±0.9)J/min,均低于传统组的(8.6±1.5)J/min、(9.5±1.0)J/min、(12.2±1.8)J/min、(8.6±0.9)J/min(P<0.05 或 0.01);EIT 组 P/F 分别为(207.1±7.1)mmHg、(213.1±6.9)mmHg、(239.3±13.1)mmHg、(255.5±11.8)mmHg,均高于传统组的(179.6±7.2)mmHg、(187.8±9.6)mmHg、(212.8±9.6)mmHg、(228.1±12.3)mmHg(P<0.05 或 0.01);EIT组 GI 分别为 0.381±0.013、0.387±0.012、0.392±0.010、0.395±0.010,均低于传统组的0.403±0.005、0.406±0.005、0.409±0.005、0.411±0.004(P<0.01);两组动脉血pH值、PaCO2、ROI1~4、HR、CVP、MAP、ICP及rScO2分级差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).EIT组机械通气时间为(78.5±9.0)h,短于传统组的(83.1±7.4)h(P<0.05);EIT组VILI发生率为0.0%(0/42),低于传统组的7.8%(3/38)(P<0.05);两组ICU住院时间及6个月生存率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 机械通气治疗TBI合并ARDS时,与传统PEEP-FiO2表法相比,EIT技术引导的最佳PEEP更高,在此最佳PEEP下能更有效改善患者的呼吸力学和氧供,使局部肺通气更均一,可缩短机械通气时间并降低VILI的发生率,且不影响患者的血流动力学及脑灌注.
Application effect of pulmonary electric impedance tomography-guided positive end-expiratory pressure on mechanical ventilation in patients with traumatic brain injury complicated with acute respiratory distress syndrome
Objective To compare the application effects of electric impedance tomography(EIT)-guided positive end-expiratory pressure conventional PEEP and PEEP-fraction of inspired oxygen(FiO2)table-guided PEEP in the mechanical ventilation of patients with traumatic brain injury(TBI)complicated with acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS).Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted on the clinical data of 80 TBI patients complicated with ARDS admitted to Zhengzhou Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University from July 2020 to December 2022,including 42 males and 38 females,aged 29-59 years[(42.4±7.8)years].The Glasgow coma scale(GCS)scores were 3-12 points[(7.7±2.2)points].According to ARDS classification,33 were mild,26 moderate and 21 severe.All the patients were treated with mechanical ventilation according to lung protective ventilation strategy,including 42 patients treated with EIT-guided PEEP(EIT group)and 38 treated with conventional PEEP-FiO2 table-guided PEEP(conventional group).At 12 hours,1,3 and 5 days after ventilation,the optimal PEEP,respiratory mechanics[driving pressure(△P),static compliance(CSt),mechanical power(MP)],pulmonary gas exchange[arterial blood pH value,arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide(PaCO2),oxygenation index(P/F)],ventilation distribution[heterogeneity index(GI),regions of interest(ROI)1-4],hemodynamics[heart rate(HR),central venous pressure(CVP),mean arterial pressure(MAP)],cerebral perfusion status[intracranial pressure(ICP),regional cerebral oxygen saturation(rScO2)grading],and treatment outcomes(mechanical ventilation duration,incidence of ventilator-induced lung injury(VILI),length of ICU stay,6-month survival rate)separately at their optimal PEEP were compared between the two groups.Results All the patients were followed up for 6 months.The optimal PEEP of the EIT group was(7.4±1.0)cm,(8.2±1.2)cm,(9.8±0.8)cm and(8.4±0.7)cm respectively at 12 hours,1,3 and 5 days after mechanical ventilation,which were higher than(7.0±1.0)cm,(7.6±1.0)cm,(9.0±0.6)cm and(7.2±0.5)cm of the conventional group(P<0.05 or 0.01).At their optimal PEEP separately,at 12 hours,1,3 and 5 days after treatment,the △P of the EIT group was(7.1±1.3)cmH2O,(7.7±1.3)cmH2O,(9.5±1.1)cmH2O and(6.1±1.3)cmH2O respectively,which were all lower than(8.9±1.3)cmH2O,(10.5±1.3)cmH2O,(11.2±1.2)cmH2O and(8.7±1.2)cmH2O of the conventional group respectively(P<0.05 or 0.01);the CSt of the EIT group was(51.5±4.2)ml/cmH2O,(52.9±4.6)ml/cmH2O,(55.1±4.3)ml/cmH2O and(57.5±3.6)ml/cmH2O,which were all higher than(46.8± 3.9)ml/cmH2O,(47.6±4.4)ml/cmH2O,(49.9±4.3)ml/cmH2O and(53.3±3.6)ml/cmH2O of the conventional group respectively(P<0.05);the MP of the EIT group was(7.9±1.8)J/min,(8.8±1.3)J/min,(10.6±1.3)J/min and(7.8±0.9)J/min,which were lower than(8.6±1.5)J/min,(9.5±1.0)J/min,(12.2±1.8)J/min and(8.6± 0.9)J/min of the conventional group respectively(P<0.05 or 0.01);the P/F of the EIT group was(207.1± 7.1)mmHg,(213.1±6.9)mmHg,(239.3±13.1)mmHg and(255.5±11.8)mmHg,which were all higher than(179.6±7.2)mmHg,(187.8±9.6)mmHg,(212.8±9.6)mmHg and(228.1±12.3)mmHg of the conventional group respectively(P<0.05 or 0.01);the GI of the EIT group were 0.381±0.013,0.387±0.012,0.392± 0.010 and 0.395±0.010,lower than 0.403±0.005,0.406±0.005,0.409±0.005 and 0.411±0.004 of traditional group respectively(P<0.01);there were no significant differences in the arterial blood pH value,PaCO2,ROI1-4,HR,CVP,MAP,ICP,or rScO2 grading between the two groups(P>0.05).The ventilation duration of the EIT group was(78.5±9.0)hours,which was shorter than(83.1±7.4)hours of the conventional group(P<0.05).The incidence of VILI was 0.0%(0/42)in the EIT group,which was lower than 7.8%(3/38)in the conventional group(P<0.05).There were no significant differences in the ICU stay or 6-month survival rate between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusions In mechanical ventilation treatment of TBI complicated with ARDS,the optimal PEEP guided by EIT was higher than that guided by PEEP-FiO2 table.At this optimal PEEP,the respiratory mechanics and oxygen supply of the patients can be improved more effectively,making regional lung ventilation more uniform,reducing the mechanical ventilation time and decreasing the incidence of VILI without affecting their hemodynamics and brain perfusion.

Brain injuriesRespiratory distress syndromeElectric impedance

徐兰娟、郑惠、刘朋举、刘香漫、刘晓刚、刘静、李丽青、李成建

展开 >

郑州大学附属郑州中心医院重症医学科,郑州 450001

脑损伤 呼吸窘迫综合征 电阻抗

河南省医学科技攻关计划联合共建项目

LHGJ20230779

2024

中华创伤杂志
中华医学会

中华创伤杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.425
ISSN:1001-8050
年,卷(期):2024.40(5)
  • 22