首页|创伤性颈脊髓损伤患者并发神经源性休克预测模型的构建及验证

创伤性颈脊髓损伤患者并发神经源性休克预测模型的构建及验证

扫码查看
目的 构建创伤性颈脊髓损伤患者并发神经源性休克的预测模型并验证其效能.方法 采用回顾性病例对照研究分析2017年1月至2022年12月山西医科大学第三医院收治的381例创伤性颈脊髓损伤患者的临床资料,其中男311例,女70例;年龄12~86岁[(55.1±12.9)岁].121例(31.8%)并发神经源性休克.将患者按照随机分配的原则以7∶3的比例,分为训练集(267例)和测试集(114例).根据是否并发神经源性休克,将训练集267例分为非神经源性休克组(186例)和神经源性休克组(81例).收集患者一般资料、临床资料、实验室检测指标及影像学资料.采用单因素分析比较训练集神经源性休克组与非神经源性休克组上述指标的差异;采用多因素Logistic回归分析筛选创伤性颈脊髓损伤患者并发神经源性休克的预测因子并构建回归方程.利用R软件绘制基于回归方程的列线图预测模型.绘制训练集和测试集的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,计算曲线下面积(AUC)评价模型的区分度;采用校准曲线评价模型的校准度;绘制决策曲线分析(DCA)评价模型的临床适用性.结果 单因素分析结果显示,训练集神经源性休克组与非神经源性休克组美国脊髓损伤协会(ASIA)分级、气管插管、入院24 h内血清白蛋白浓度、髓内病变长度(IMLL)、脊髓受压最大程度(MSCC)、信号强度分级(ISI)及最高损伤节段差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).多因素Logistic回归分析结果表明,ASIA分级(C级:A级:OR=0.13,95%CI0.03,0.59,P<0.01;D级:A级:OR=0.04,95%CI0.01,0.28,P<0.01)、入院24 h 内血清白蛋白浓度(OR=0.75,95%CI 0.65,0.86,P<0.01)、IMLL(OR=2.71,95%CI 1.68,4.38,P<0.01)、ISI(2级:0级:OR=5.62,95%CI 1.07,29.48,P<0.05)及最高损伤节段(OR=0.49,95%CI0.29,0.83,P<0.01)是创伤性颈脊髓损伤患者并发神经源性休克的预测因子.依据上述5个变量构建回归方程:Logit[P/(1-P)]=10.99-1.06×"ASIA分级"-0.29×"入院24 h内血清白蛋白浓度"+1.04×"IMLL"+0.89×"ISI"-0.74×"最高损伤节段".在基于此方程建立的预测模型中,训练集 AUC 为 0.97(95%CI 0.97,0.99),测试集 AUC 为 0.95(95%CI 0.91,0.99).在训练集与测试集的校准曲线中,预测曲线和参考曲线均大致重叠,平均绝对误差分别为0.013和0.050.DCA结果显示,训练集和测试集的阈值概率分别在0%~97%、0%~100%区间时,患者的净获益>0.结论 基于ASIA分级、入院24 h内血清白蛋白浓度、IMLL、ISI和最高损伤节段构建的创伤性颈脊髓损伤患者并发神经源性休克预测模型,展示出良好的区分度、校准度和临床适用性.
Construction and validation of prediction model for neurogenic shock in patients with traumatic cervical spinal cord injury
Objective To construct a prediction model for neurogenic shock in patients with traumatic cervical spinal cord injury and validate its effectiveness.Methods A retrospective case-control study was conducted on the clinical data of 381 patients with traumatic cervical spinal cord injury admitted to the Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University from January 2017 to December 2022,including 311 males and 70 females,aged 12-86 years[(55.1±12.9)years].A total of 121 patients(31.8%)were complicated with neurogenic shock.The patients were randomly divided into training set(n=267)and validation set(n=114)with a ratio of 7∶3.The training set was divided into neurogenic shock group(n=81)and non-neurogenic shock group(n=186)according to whether they were complicated with neurogenic shock.The general data,clinical data,laboratory indicators and imaging data of the patients were collected.Univariate analysis was used to determine differences in the aforementioned indicators between the neurogenic shock group and non-neurogenic shock group in the training set.Multivariate Logistic regression analysis was conducted to screen the predictors for neurogenic shock in patients with traumatic cervical spinal cord injury,and regression equation was constructed.A nomogram prediction model based on the regression equation was plotted with R programming language.Receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curves of the training set and validation set were plotted,when the area under the curve(AUC)was calculated to determine the discriminability of the model.The calibration of the model was assessed with calibration curves.The clinical applicability of the model was evaluated by the decision curve analysis(DCA).Results The univariate analysis showed that there were statistically significant differences in the American Spinal Injury Association(ASIA)grade,tracheal intubation,serum albumin concentration within 24 hours on admission,intramedullary lesion length(IMLL),maximum spinal cord compression(MSCC),increased signal intensity(ISI),and highest damaged segment between the neurogenic shock group and non-neurogenic shock group in the training set(P<0.05).The multivariate Logistic regression analysis revealed that AISA grade(grade C vs.grade A:OR=0.13,95%CI 0.03,0.59,P<0.01;grade D vs.grade A:OR=0.04,95%CI 0.01,0.28,P<0.01),serum albumin concentration within 24 hours on admission(OR=0.75,95%CI 0.65,0.86,P<0.01),IMLL(OR=2.71,95%CI 1.68,4.38,P<0.01),ISI(grade 2 vs.grade 0:OR=5.62,95%CI 1.07,29.48,P<0.05),and highest damaged segment(OR=0.49,95%CI 0.29,0.83,P<0.01)were predictors for neurogenic shock in patients with traumatic cervical spinal cord injury.Based on the 5 forementioned variables,the regression equation was constructed as follows:Logit[P/(1-P)]=10.99-1.06×"AISA grade"-0.29×"serum albumin concentration within 24 hours on admission"+1.04×"IMLL"+0.89×"ISI"-0.74×"highest damaged segment".In the prediction model constructed based on the equation,the AUC values of the training set and validation set were 0.97(95%CI 0.97,0.99)and 0.95(95%CI 0.91,0.99).Calibration curves of the training set and validation set demonstrated the prediction curve roughly overlapped with the reference curve and the mean absolute errors of the two sets were 0.013 and 0.050.DCA results showed that the net benefit rate of patients was greater than 0 when the threshold probability ranged from 0%to 97%for the training set and from 0%to 100%for the validation set.Conclusion The prediction model based on the AISA grade,serum albumin concentration within 24 hours on admission,IMLL,ISI,and highest damaged segment demonstrates good discriminability,calibration and clinical applicability in predicting neurogenic shock in patients with traumatic cervical spinal cord injury.

Spinal cord injuriesShockNomograms

宋子麟、何李明、柳青青、冯皓宇

展开 >

山西医科大学第三医院(山西白求恩医院,山西医学科学院,同济山西医院)骨科,太原 030032

脊髓损伤 休克 列线图

山西省卫生健康委员会基金项目

2020TD13

2024

中华创伤杂志
中华医学会

中华创伤杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.425
ISSN:1001-8050
年,卷(期):2024.40(7)