首页|肋骨骨折患者发生心肌挫伤预测模型的构建及其临床应用价值

肋骨骨折患者发生心肌挫伤预测模型的构建及其临床应用价值

扫码查看
目的 构建肋骨骨折患者发生心肌挫伤(MC)的预测模型并评价其临床应用价值.方法 采用回顾性病例对照研究分析2017年1月至2019年12月南京医科大学附属江苏盛泽医院收治的370例肋骨骨折患者的临床资料,其中男257例,女113例;年龄18~95岁[(56.5±14.0)岁].患者入院24h内均接受心电图检查和心肌标志物检测,其中159例诊断为MC,211例无MC(NMC).采用完全随机法将370例患者按7:3的比例分为训练集264例(MC 106例、NMC 158例)和验证集106例(MC 53例、NMC53例).在训练集中,比较MC组和NMC组患者的人口学特征、入院时生命体征、肋骨骨折类型、肋骨骨折数、肋骨骨折部位、关联的胸部损伤、创伤评分、实验室检查指标.通过Spearman相关分析筛选肋骨骨折患者发生MC的正相关变量,且采用单因素二元Logistic回归分析MC的正相关变量以确定肋骨骨折患者发生MC的危险因素.采用LASSO回归和多因素Logistic回归分析筛选肋骨骨折患者发生MC的独立危险因素并构建回归方程,且利用R软件构建基于回归方程的列线图预测模型.绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评价模型的区分度.采用Hosmer-Lemeshow(H-L)拟合优度检验及Bootstrap法重复抽样1 000次的校准曲线评价模型的校准度.采用决策曲线分析(DCA)和临床影响曲线分析(CIC)评价模型的临床应用价值.根据独立危险因素的β系数赋值进行风险评分,将入选的370例肋骨骨折患者分为低危组202例、中危组108例、高危组50例和极高危组10例,比较不同亚组患者MC发生率和院内死亡率,进一步验证模型的临床应用价值.结果 在训练集中,MC组和NMC组双侧肋骨骨折、连枷胸、肋骨骨折数、上胸部近胸骨侧段、上胸部前外侧段、上胸部近脊柱侧段、中胸部前外侧段、中胸部近脊柱侧段、下胸部前外侧段、气胸、纵隔气肿、血胸、胸骨骨折、胸部简明损伤定级(c-AIS)、损伤严重评分(ISS)、新损伤严重度评分(NISS)、白细胞、血红蛋白、红细胞压积、总胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白、白蛋白、谷草转氨酶、谷丙转氨酶和血尿素氮差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05或0.01)o Spearman相关分析显示,双侧肋骨骨折、连枷胸、肋骨骨折数、上胸部近胸骨侧段、上胸部前外侧段、上胸部近脊柱侧段、中胸部前外侧段、中胸部近脊柱侧段、下胸部前外侧段、气胸、血胸、胸骨骨折、c-AIS、ISS、NISS、白细胞、谷草转氨酶和血尿素氮均与MC呈正相关(P<0.05或0.01).单因素二元Logistic回归分析显示,上述正相关变量均与肋骨骨折患者发生MC显著相关(P<0.05或0.01).LASSO回归分析筛选出4个预测变量,分别是上胸部前外侧段、中胸部近脊柱侧段、气胸和胸骨骨折.多因素Logistic回归分析显示,上述4个预测变量是肋骨骨折患者发生MC的独立危险因素(P<0.05或0.01).依据上述独立危险因素在训练集中构建回归方程:P=ex/(1+ex),其中x=1.57×"上胸部前外侧段"+0.73×"中胸部近脊柱侧段"+1.36×"气胸"+2.16×"胸骨骨折"-1.10.在基于此建立的肋骨骨折患者发生MC预测模型中,训练集和验证集ROC曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.77(95%CI0.72,0.83)、0.77(95%CI0.71,0.82).H-L拟合优度检验显示,训练集x2=2.77,P=0.429;验证集x2=1.33,P=0.515;校准曲线结果表明,训练集和验证集的偏倚校正曲线与实际曲线一致性良好,且均接近理想曲线.训练集和验证集DCA结果显示,阈概率在0.2~0.8范围内,预测模型可获得良好的临床净获益.训练集和验证集CIC结果显示,阈概率>0.4,模型判定为MC的高风险患者与实际发生MC的患者高度匹配.风险评分亚组分析显示,高危组肋骨骨折患者MC发生率和院内死亡率分别为80.0%和6.0%,极高危组分别为90.0%和20.0%,均显著高于低危组(24.8%和1.0%)和中危组(55.6%和1.9%)(P<0.05).结论 基于上胸部前外侧段、中胸部近脊柱侧段、气胸和胸骨骨折构建的肋骨骨折患者发生MC预测模型,具备良好的预测效能和临床应用价值.
Establishment of a predictive model for myocardial contusion in patients with rib fractures and its clinical application value
Objective To establish a predictive model for myocardial contusion(MC)in patients with rib fractures and evaluate its clinical application value.Methods A retrospective case-control study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 370 patients with rib fractures admitted to the Affiliated Jiangsu Shengze Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from January 2017 to December 2019,including 257 males and 113 females,aged 18-95 years[(56.5±14.0)years].All the patients underwent electrocardiogram examination and myocardial biomarker test within 24 hours on admission,of whom 159 were diagnosed with MC,and 211 with non-MC(NMC).The 370 patients were divided into a training set of 264 patients(106 with MC,158 with NMC)and a validation set of 106 patients(53 with MC,53 with NMC)at a ratio of 7∶3 through the completely randomized method.In the training set,the MC group and NMC group were compared in terms of their demographic characteristics,vital signs on admission,types of rib fractures,number of rib fractures,locations of rib fractures,associated thoracic injuries,trauma scores,and laboratory indices.Variables of positive correlation with MC in patients with rib fractures were screened by Spearman correlation analysis,followed by univariate binary Logistic regression analysis for these variables to determine the risk factors for MC in patients with rib fractures.LASSO regression analysis and multivariate Logistic regression analysis were applied to identify the independent risk factors for MC in patients with rib fractures,and the regression equation was constructed.A nomogram prediction model was plotted based on the regression equation with R software.The receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve was plotted to evaluate the model's discriminability.Hosmer-Lemeshow(H-L)goodness-of-fit test and calibration curves of 1000 repeated samplings by the Bootstrap method were used to evaluate the calibration of the model.The decision curve analysis(DCA)and clinical impact curve analysis(CIC)were plotted to evaluate its clinical efficacy.A risk scoring was performed according to the assigned β coefficient of independent risk factors.Accordingly,the 370 selected patients with rib fractures were divided into low-risk subgroup of 202 patients,moderate-risk subgroup of 108 patients,high-risk subgroup of 50 patients,and extremely high-risk subgroup of 10 patients.The incidence of MC and in-hospital mortality were compared among different subgroups so as to further verify the clinical application value of the predictive model.Results In the training set,there were significant differences between the MC group and NMC group in bilateral rib fractures,flail chest,number of rib fractures,upper chest proximal sternum segment,upper chest anterolateral segment,upper chest proximal spinal segment,middle chest anterolateral segment,middle chest proximal spinal segment,lower chest anterolateral segment,pneumothorax,mediastinal emphysema,hemothorax,sternal fractures,chest abbreviated injury scale(c-AIS),injury severity score(ISS),new injury severity score(NISS),white blood cell counts,hemoglobin,hematocrit,total cholesterol,low density lipoprotein,albumin,aspartate aminotransferase,alanine aminotransferase,and blood urea nitrogen(P<0.05 or 0.01).Spearman correlation analysis showed that the bilateral rib fractures,flail chest,number of rib fractures,upper chest proximal sternum segment,upper chest anterolateral segment,upper chest proximal spinal segment,middle chest anterolateral segment,middle chest proximal spinal segment,lower chest anterolateral segment,pneumothorax,hemothorax,sternal fractures,c-AIS,ISS,NISS,white blood cell count,aspartate aminotransferase and blood urea nitrogen were positively correlated with MC(P<0.05 or 0.01).Univariate binary Logistic regression analysis verified that the above variables with positive correlation were significantly correlated with MC in patients with rib fractures(P<0.05 or 0.01).The 4 predictor variables screened by LASSO regression analysis were the upper chest anterolateral segment,middle chest proximal spinal segment,pneumothorax,and sternal fractures.Multivariate Logistic regression analysis confirmed that the aforementioned 4 predictor variables were independent risk factors for MC in patients with rib fractures(P<0.05 or 0.01).The regression equation of the training set was established based on the above independent risk factors:P=ex/(1+ex),with the x=1.57×"upper chest anterolateral segment"+0.73×"middle chest proximal spinal segment"+1.36×"pneumothorax"+2.16×"sternal fractures"-1.10.In the predictive model for MC in patients with rib fractures established based on the equation,the area under the ROC curve(AUC)was 0.77(95%CI 0.72,0.83)and 0.77(95%CI 0.71,0.82)in the training set and validation set.The H-L goodness-of-fit test showed x2=2.77,P=0.429 in the training set,and x2=1.33,P=0.515 in the validation set,indicating that there was no significant difference between the predicted probability and the actual probability of the model(P>0.05).The calibration curves showed that the bias-corrected curves of the training set and validation set were in good consistency with the actual curves and were both close to the ideal curves.The DCA of the training set and the validation set showed that within the threshold probability range of 0.2-0.8,the predictive model could obtain good net clinical benefits.The CIC of the training set and the validation set indicated that when the threshold probability was>0.4,the population identified as high-risk MC patients by the predictive model highly matched the actual MC patients.Risk scoring of subgroups found that the incidence of MC and in-hospital mortality among the patients with rib fractures were 80.0%and 6.0%in the high-risk subgroup and 90.0%and 20.0%in the extremely high-risk subgroup,significantly higher than those in the low-risk subgroup(24.8%,1.0%)and the moderate-risk subgroup(55.6%,1.9%)(P<0.05).Conclusions The predictive model for MC in patients with rib fractures constructed based on the upper chest anterolateral segment,middle chest proximal spinal segment,pneumothorax,and sternal fractures has good predictive efficacy and clinical application value.

Rib fracturesPrognosisRisk factorsCase-control studies

余长永、宋月坤、朱康宇、程祥、朱天皓、刘武新

展开 >

南京医科大学附属江苏盛泽医院胸外科,苏州 215228

南京医科大学附属江苏盛泽医院急诊科,苏州 215228

肋骨骨折 预后 危险因素 病例对照研究

苏州市科技发展计划项目苏州市吴江区"科教兴卫"项目

SKYD2023022WWK202320

2024

中华创伤杂志
中华医学会

中华创伤杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.425
ISSN:1001-8050
年,卷(期):2024.40(8)