首页|骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折经皮椎体后凸成形术术后常规疗法联合地舒单抗抗骨质疏松的疗效

骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折经皮椎体后凸成形术术后常规疗法联合地舒单抗抗骨质疏松的疗效

扫码查看
目的 比较骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(OVCF)经皮椎体后凸成形术(PKP)术后常规疗法与常规疗法联合地舒单抗抗骨质疏松的疗效.方法 采用回顾性队列研究分析2020年9月至2022年9月苏州大学附属第二医院收治的211例OVCF患者的临床资料,均为女性;年龄56~90岁[(71.4±8.1)岁].术前腰椎骨密度T值为(-2.6±1.0)SD.骨折节段:T1-T945例,T10~L2146例,L3~L5 69例.174例行单节段手术,25例行2节段手术,12例行3节段及以上手术.按照患者意愿,107例PKP术后每日口服钙剂和活性维生素D(常规治疗组),104例PKP术后在常规治疗基础上联合地舒单抗(地舒单抗治疗组).比较两组术前及末次随访时腰椎骨密度T值;术前,术后3 d、6个月及末次随访时视觉模拟评分(VAS)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI);术后再骨折发生率.观察两组抗骨质疏松治疗期间可能存在的用药后不良反应.结果 患者均获随访12~24个月[(13.5±2.0)个月].术前地舒单抗治疗组腰椎骨密度T值为(-2.7±1.1)SD,常规治疗组为(-2.5±0.8)SD(P>0.05);末次随访时,地舒单抗治疗组腰椎骨密度T值为(-2.1±1.1)SD,显著高于常规治疗组的(-2.5±0.9)SD(P<0.05).末次随访时,地舒单抗治疗组腰椎骨密度T值较术前显著增加(P<0.01),而常规治疗组较术前差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).术前及术后3 d,地舒单抗治疗组VAS分别为(8.5±0.9)分、(2.8±0.8)分,ODI分别为48.7±4.8、25.6±4.0,较常规治疗组的(8.5±1.3)分、(2.8±0.9)分和47.9±7.0、25.9±3.7差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后6个月及末次随访时,地舒单抗治疗组VAS分别为(2.2±0.8)分、(1.7±0.8)分,ODI分别为24.2±3.6、23.2±4.1,显著低于常规治疗组的(2.8±0.9)分、(2.8±1.1)分和26.4±3.2、27.3±4.0(P<0.01).两组术后各时间点VAS均较术前显著下降(P<0.05),其中地舒单抗治疗组术后VAS持续下降(P<0.05),常规治疗组术后VAS差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).两组术后各时间点ODI均较术前显著下降(P<0.05),其中地舒单抗治疗组术后ODI持续下降(P<0.05),常规治疗组术后6个月ODI较术后3 d差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),末次随访时ODI较术后3 d上升(P<0.05).地舒单抗治疗组术后再骨折发生率为6.7%(7/104),显著低于常规治疗组的16.8%(18/107)(P<0.05).两组抗骨质疏松治疗期间均无明显不良反应.结论 对于OVCF患者,与PKP术后每日口服钙剂和活性维生素D相比,术后联合地舒单抗可有效增加骨密度、持续减轻疼痛并促进功能恢复、有效降低再骨折发生风险.
Antiosteoporosis effect of conventional treatment combined with Denosumab after percutaneous kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures
Objective To compare the antiosteoporosis effect of conventional treatment and conventional treatment combined with Denosumab after percutaneous kyphoplasty(PKP)for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures(OVCF).Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 211 patients with OVCF admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from September 2020 to September 2022.All the patients were female,aged 56-90 years[(71.4±8.1)years].The bone mineral density T-score of the lumbar spine was(-2.6±1.0)SD before operation.Fracture segments included T1-T9 in 45 patients,T10-L2 in 146,and L3-L5in 69.Of all,174 patients were treated with single-segment surgery,25 with two-segment surgery and 12 with surgery involving three or more segments.According to the wishes of the patients,107 patients were treated with daily oral administration of calcium and active Vitamin D after PKP(conventional treatment group)and 104 patients with Denosumab combined with the conventional treatment after PKP(Denosumab therapy group).The bone mineral density T-scores of the lumbar spine of the two groups were compared before surgery and at the last follow-up.The visual analogue scale(VAS)and Oswestry disability index(ODI)before surgery,at 3 days,6 months after surgery,and at the last follow-up were evaluated and the refracture rate after surgery was detected.Possible adverse effects after medication during anti-osteoporosis treatment were observed in two the groups.Results All the patients were followed up for 12-24 months[(13.5±2.0)months].Before surgery,the bone mineral density T-score of the lumbar spine was(-2.7±1.1)SD in the Denosumab therapy group and(-2.5±0.8)SD in the conventional treatment group(P>0.05).At the last follow-up,the bone mineral density T-score of the lumbar spine was(-2.1±1.1)SD in the Denosumab therapy group,significantly higher than(-2.5±0.9)SD in the conventional treatment group(P<0.05).In the Denosumab therapy group,the bone mineral density T-score of the lumbar spine at the last follow-up was significantly increased compared to that before surgery(P<0.01),while there was no significant difference in the conventional treatment group(P<0.05).Before surgery and at 3 days after surgery,the VAS scores and ODI values were(8.5±0.9)points,(2.8±0.8)points,48.7±4.8 and 25.6±4.0 in the Denosumab therapy group,which was not statistically different from those in the conventional treatment group[(8.5±1.3)points and(2.8±0.9)points,47.9±7.0 and 25.9±3.7](P>0.05).At 6 months after surgery and at the last follow-up,the VAS scores and ODI values were(2.2±0.8)points,(1.7±0.8)points,24.2±3.6 and 23.2±4.1 in the Denosumab therapy group,significantly lower than those of the conventional treatment group[(2.8±0.9)points,(2.8±1.1)points,26.4±3.2 and 27.3±4.0](P<0.01).The VAS scores at each time point after surgery in both groups decreased significantly compared with those before surgery(P<0.05).The VAS scores continued to decrease after surgery in the Denosumab therapy group(P<0.05),while no significant difference was found among those at different time points in the conventional treatment group(P>0.05).The ODI values at each time point after surgery in both groups significantly decreased compared to those before surgery(P<0.05).The ODI values continued to decrease after surgery in the Denosumab therapy group(P<0.05),while in the conventional treatment group,no significant difference was found between those at 6 months after surgery and those at 3 days after surgery(P>0.05)and they were improved at the last follow-up compared with those at 3 days after surgery(P<0.05).The refracture rate after surgery was 6.7%(7/104)in the Denosumab therapy group,significantly lower than 16.8%(18/107)in the conventional treatment group(P<0.05).No serious complications were observed during the antiosteoporosis period in either group.Conclusion Compared with daily oral administration of Calcium and active Vitamin D after PKP,the conventional treatment combined with Denosumab after PKP can effectively increase the bone density,relieve pain continuously,improve functional restoration,and reduce the risk of refracture in OVCF patients.

OsteoporosisSpinal fracturesKyphoplastyDenosumab

吴晨阳、顾燚平、邱学力、单华建、高翔、陶理德、张应子、单冰晨、周晓中、白进玉

展开 >

苏州大学附属第二医院骨科,苏州 215004

骨质疏松 脊柱骨折 椎体成形术 地舒单抗

2024

中华创伤杂志
中华医学会

中华创伤杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.425
ISSN:1001-8050
年,卷(期):2024.40(9)