首页|严重创伤患者院内死亡的危险因素及其预测价值

严重创伤患者院内死亡的危险因素及其预测价值

扫码查看
目的 探讨严重创伤患者院内死亡的危险因素及其预测价值.方法 采用回顾性病例对照研究分析2017年1月至2021年12月苏州大学附属第二医院创伤中心创伤数据库中509例严重创伤患者的数据,其中男377例,女132例;年龄18~94岁[53(42,65)岁].损伤严重度评分(ISS)16~75分[22(18,29)分].损伤部位:头颈部409例(80.35%),胸部328例(64.44%),腹部193例(37.91%),骨盆142例(27.90%),脊柱79例(15.52%),四肢247例(48.53%).根据患者院内临床结局分为生存组(390例)和死亡组(119例).比较两组基线资料及临床资料,包括性别、年龄、致伤原因(交通伤、高处坠落伤、锐器伤、其他)、损伤部位(头颈部、胸部、腹部、骨盆、脊柱、四肢)、入院时生命体征(体温、收缩压、心率、呼吸频率)、入院时血液检查[血红蛋白、血小板、凝血酶原时间(PT)、活化部分凝血活酶时间(APTT)、国际标准化比值(INR)、纤维蛋白原(FIB)]、入抢救室时格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)、入抢救室时修正创伤评分(RTS)、全身CT检查后ISS、入抢救室时快速序贯器官衰竭评分(qSOFA)和INR联合qSOFA.先通过单因素分析比较生存组、死亡组基线和临床资料,再采用多因素Logistic逐步回归(向前向后)确定严重创伤患者院内死亡的独立危险因素.根据前述资料,通过Medcalc统计软件生成受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,分析各危险因素评估严重创伤患者院内死亡的效能.结果 单因素分析结果显示,两组年龄、各损伤部位、体温、收缩压、血红蛋白、血小板、PT、APTT、INR、FIB、GCS、RTS、ISS、qSOFA、INR联合qSOFA比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05或0.01);两组性别、各致伤原因、心率、呼吸频率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).多因素Logistic逐步回归分析结果表明,年龄、收缩压、APTT、ISS、INR联合qSOFA与严重创伤患者院内死亡显著相关(P<0.01).ROC曲线分析结果表明,年龄、收缩压、APTT、ISS、INR联合qSOFA预测严重创伤患者院内死亡的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.63(95%CI0.59,0.68)、0.60(95%CI0.55,0.64)、0.66(95%CI 0.62,0.70)、0.73(95%CI0.69,0.77)、0.75(95%CI0.72,0.80).结论 年龄、收缩压、APTT、ISS、INR联合qSOFA是严重创伤患者院内死亡的独立危险因素,且ISS、INR联合qSOFA较年龄、收缩压、APTT可更好地预测严重创伤患者院内死亡.
Risk factors for in-hospital mortality in patients with severe trauma and their predictive value
Objective To explore the risk factors for in-hospital mortality in patients with severe trauma and their predictive predictive value.Methods A retrospective case-control study was used to analyze the data of 509 patients with severe trauma in the trauma database of the Trauma Center of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from January 2017 to December 2021,including 377 males and 132 females,aged 18-94 years[53(42,65)years].Injury severity score(ISS)was 16-75 points[22(18,29)points].Injured parts included the head and neck in 409 patients(80.35%),the chest in 328(64.44%),the abdomen in 193(37.91%),the pelvis in 142(27.90%),the spine in 79(15.52%),and the limb in 247(48.53%).According to the clinical outcome during the hospital stay,the patients were divided into survival group(n=390)and non-survival group(n=119).Baseline and clinical data of the two groups were compared,including gender,age,cause of injury(traffic injury,fall from height,sharp instrument injury,etc.),injury site(head and neck,chest,abdomen,pelvis,spine,limb),vital signs on admission(temperature,systolic blood pressure,heart rate,respiratory rate),blood tests on admission[hemoglobin,platelets,prothrombin time(PT),activated partial thromboplastin time(APTT),international normalized ratio(INR),fibrinogen(FIB)],Glasgow coma scale(GCS)upon admission to the emergency room,revised trauma score(RTS)upon admission to the emergency room,ISS after whole-body CT examination,quick sequential organ failure assessment(qSOFA)score upon admission to the emergency room,and INR combined with qSOFA score.The baseline and clinical data of the survival group and the non-survival group were first compared with univariate analysis.Then,the independent risk factors of in-hospital mortality in patients with severe trauma were determined by multivariate Logistic stepwise regression(forward and backward).Based on the above data,receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curves were generated with Medcalc statistical software to analyze the efficacy of each risk factor in assessing in-hospital mortality in patients with severe trauma.Results Univariate analysis showed that there were significant differences in age,injury site,temperature,systolic blood pressure,hemoglobin,platelet,PT,APTT,INR,FIB,GCS,RTS,ISS,qSOFA score,and INR combined with qSOFA score between the two groups(P<0.05 or 0.01),while there were no significant differences in gender,cause of injury,heart rate,and respiratory rate between the two groups(P>0.05).Multivariate Logistic stepwise regression analysis showed that age,systolic blood pressure,APTT,ISS,and INR combined with qSOFA score were significantly correlated with in-hospital mortality in patients with severe trauma(P<0.01).ROC curve analysis results showed that the area under the curve(AUC)of in-hospital mortality in patients with severe trauma predicted by age,systolic blood pressure,APTT,ISS,and INR combined with qSOFA score were 0.63(95%CI 0.59,0.68)and 0.60(95%CI 0.55,0.64),0.66(95%CI 0.62,0.70),0.73(95%CI 0.69,0.77),and 0.75(95%CI 0.72,0.80),respectively.Conclusions Age,systolic blood pressure,APTT,ISS,and INR combined with qSOFA score are the independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality in patients with severe trauma.ISS and INR combined qSOFA score can better predict in-hospital mortality of patients with severe trauma than age,systolic blood pressure and APTT.

Multiple traumaInternational normalized ratioInjury severity scorePrognosisQuick sequential organ failure assessment score

杨林、杨晨、陈岑、武妍、杨骏驰、程小龙、吴海飞、朱建军、季兵

展开 >

苏州大学附属第二医院急重症医学科,苏州 215004

多处创伤 国际标准化比 损伤严重度评分 预后 快速序贯器官衰竭评分

苏州市姑苏卫生人才项目

GSWS2021017

2024

中华创伤杂志
中华医学会

中华创伤杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.425
ISSN:1001-8050
年,卷(期):2024.40(10)