Curative Effect Comparison of Non-Invasive NCPAP and Non-Invasive NIPPV in Treatment of Respiratory Distress Syndrome of Premature Infants
Objective To compare curative effect of non-invasive nasal continuous positive airway pressure(NCPAP)and non-invasive nasal intermittent positive airway pressure(NIPPV)in clinical treatment of respiratory distress syndrome(RDS)of premature infants.Methods The paper chose 150 premature infants with RDS from July 2020 to July 2023,and divided them into two groups.Control group(75 cases)was treated with non-invasive NCPAP treatment,while study group(75 cases)with non-invasive NIPPV treatment.Curative effect between two groups was compared.Results Study group had higher levels of PaO2 and lower levels of FiO2 in blood gas analysis indicators at 12 and 24 hours after non-invasive ventilation than control group,comparison was statistically significant between groups,(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in non-invasive ventilation time,oxygen therapy time,total intestinal feeding time,and length of stay between two groups(P>0.05).Incidence of apnea in study group was lower than control group,and probability of successful withdrawal within 7 days in study group was significantly higher than control group,comparison was statistically significant between groups,(P<0.05).Conclusion NIPPV treatment can improve oxygenation,reduce development of apnea,increase probability of successful withdrawal of premature infants with RDS,which has advantages in application.
Non-invasive NCPAPNon invasive NIPPVRespiratory distress syndrome of premature infants
万方数据
维普
