首页|哌拉西林与头孢他啶对小儿肺炎的疗效差异研究

哌拉西林与头孢他啶对小儿肺炎的疗效差异研究

扫码查看
目的 本文主要探究哌拉西林和头孢他啶对小儿肺炎的临床疗效的差异.方法 选择2021年5月—2022年5月在院治疗的80例小儿肺炎的患者,依据治疗方法分为头孢他啶组、哌拉西林组,每组40例.头孢他啶组除常规治疗外给予头孢他啶抗感染,哌拉西林组除常规治疗外给予哌拉西林抗感染.比较两组小儿肺炎患者的治疗效果、症状消失时间、不良反应.结果 哌拉西林组治疗效果优于头孢他啶组,哌拉西林组症状消失时间比头孢他啶组短,哌拉西林组不良反应比头孢他啶组少,两组治疗效果、症状消失时间、不良反应的比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 哌拉西林是治疗小儿肺炎较为有效的方法,具有治疗效果好、不良反应少的优点,值得临床推广.
Difference Study of Curative Effect Between Piperacillin and Ceftazidime for Children with Pneumonia
Objective To explore difference of clinical effect between piperacillin and ceftazidime in treatment of pediatric pneumonia.Methods The paper chose 80 patients with pediatric pneumonia in the hospital from May 2021 to May 2022,and divided them into two groups according to treatment method:ceftazidime group and piperacillin group,with 40 cases in each group.Ceftazidime group was treated with ceftazidime anti infection based on routine treatment,and piperacillin group with piperacillin anti infection based on routine treatment.Curative effect,symptom disappearance time,and adverse reactions were compared between two groups of pediatric pneumonia patients.Results Curative effect of piperacillin group was better than ceftazidime group.Disappearance time of symptoms in piperacillin group was shorter than ceftazidime group,adverse reactions in piperacillin group were fewer than ceftazidime group.Difference in curative effect,symptom disappearance time,and adverse reactions was statistically significant between two groups,(P<0.05).Conclusion Piperacillin is an effective method for pediatric pneumonia,with advantages of good curative effect and fewer adverse reactions,which is worthy of clinical promotion.

PiperacillinCeftazidimePediatric pneumoniaAntibiotic

黄伟

展开 >

江苏大学附属武进医院/徐州医科大学武进临床学院,江苏 常州 213002

哌拉西林 头孢他啶 小儿肺炎 抗生素

2024

智慧健康

智慧健康

ISSN:
年,卷(期):2024.10(9)
  • 12