智慧健康2024,Vol.10Issue(13) :72-75.DOI:10.19335/j.cnki.2096-1219.2024.13.021

UBE-LIF治疗腰椎管狭窄症疗效观察

Curative Effect Observation Of UBE-LIF In Treatment Of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

黄栢通
智慧健康2024,Vol.10Issue(13) :72-75.DOI:10.19335/j.cnki.2096-1219.2024.13.021

UBE-LIF治疗腰椎管狭窄症疗效观察

Curative Effect Observation Of UBE-LIF In Treatment Of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

黄栢通1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 罗定市中医院,广东 罗定 527200
  • 折叠

摘要

目的 分析UBE-LIF治疗腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)的疗效.方法 回顾性分析本院在治疗单节段LSS中,施行UBE-LIF与PLIF两种术式治疗效果.选取在本院接受治疗患者,并根据不同的治疗方式分为UBE-LIF组和PLIF组,每组28例.治疗后,比较两组手术指标、VAS评分、JOA评分和并发症情况.结果 UBE-LIF组术中出血量、术后引流和术后住院时间均少于PLIF组,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).UBE-LIF组术后1个月、术后3个月的VAS评分均显著低于PLIF组,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).UBE-LIF组术后1个月、术后3个月和末次随访的JOA评分均显著高于PLIF组,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).两组并发症发生率无显著差异,组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 UBE-LIF术式相较于传统PLIF术式,在治疗单节段LSS方面具有显著优势,能显著减少患者手术创伤,有效缓解疼痛感,显著提升功能障碍的改善程度,并加速康复进程.

Abstract

Objective To analyze effect of UBE-LIF in treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis(LSS).Methods The paper reviewed and analyzed effect of UBE-LIF and PLIF in treatment of single segment LSS in our hospital,with 28 cases in each group.Surgical indicators,VAS scores JOA scores and complications were recorded and compared between two groups.Results Intraoperative bleeding amount,postoperative drainage,and postoperative hospital stay in UBE-LIF group were lower than PLIF group,(P<0.05).VAS scores of UBE-LIF group at 1 month and 3 months after surgery were significantly lower than PLIF group(P<0.05).JOA scores of UBE-LIF group at 1 month,3 months,and last follow-up were significantly higher than PLIF group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in incidence of complications between two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion UBE-LIF surgery can achieve better effect than traditional PLIF surgery for single segment LSS,can reduce trauma,alleviate pains,improve functional impairment,and accelerate recovery of patients.

关键词

UBE-LIF/腰椎管狭窄症/疗效

Key words

UBE-LIF/Lumbar spinal stenosis/Curative effect

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
智慧健康

智慧健康

ISSN:
参考文献量8
段落导航相关论文