首页|术前短程放疗联合新辅助化疗治疗老年人局部进展期直肠癌的有效性和安全性

术前短程放疗联合新辅助化疗治疗老年人局部进展期直肠癌的有效性和安全性

扫码查看
目的 探讨术前短程放疗联合新辅助化疗治疗老年人局部进展期直肠癌随访2年的治疗效果.方法 回顾性队列研究,连续纳入2012年1月至2019年12月在商丘市第一人民医院诊治的老年局部进展期直肠癌(T3~T4期和/或区域淋巴结阳性的Ⅱ~Ⅲ期)患者446例,根据治疗方法分为观察组(107例)和对照组(339例).观察组患者给予术前短程放疗联合新辅助化疗,方案为短期放疗(1周内25 Gy、分5次)继以4个疗程的化疗(CAPOX方案),对照组给予同步放化疗,方案为5周内50 Gy、分25次,同步卡培他滨化疗.随后,行全直肠系膜切除术,术后分别继续2个和6个疗程的CAPOX化疗;随访截至2021年12月31日,主要观察指标为两组患者的无病生存率(DFS),次要观察指标包括总生存时间(OS)、病变无进展生存时间(PFS)、局部复发率和急性毒性事件率,Cox回归分析比较影响DFS的因素.结果 446例患者中,男性303例(67.9%)、女性143例(32.1%).与对照组比较,观察组患者的年龄较小,东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)体质状态评分0分比例更高(均P<0.05);同时,两组患者的MRIT分期、N分期、距肛外缘距离、直肠系膜筋膜浸润、病理分期和化疗结束至手术间隔时间等差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05).平均随访(20.7±3.5)个月,死亡76例,远处转移89例,局部复发32例.Kaplan-Meier生存分析结果显示,观察组患者随访2年的DFS 率高于对照组[73.8%(79/107)比 68.1%(231/339),Log-rank x2=2.676、P=0.041],观察组的中位DFS时间长于对照组[19(12,22)个月比16(11,19)个月,Z=2.774、P=0.038].与对照组比较,观察组的中位OS时间显著延长[26(21,33)个月比22(18,14)个月,Z=2.879、P=0.032],但两组的中位PFS时间相似[20(14,25)个月比16(12,21)个月,Z=1.545、P=0.123],远处转移[18.7%(20/107)比 20.4%(69/339),Log-rank x2=0.341、P=0.708]和局部复发[9.3%(10/107)比6.5%(22/339),Log-rank x2=0.996、P=0.318]风险也相似.不良反应方面,两组患者≥3级急性毒性反应发生率比较差异无统计学意义[19.6%(21/107)比12.1%(41/339),Log-rank x2=1.661、P=0.148].多因素Cox回归分析结果显示,年龄(HR=0.586、P=0.005)、ECOG评分(HR=0.721、P=0.028)、MRI T分期(HR=0.605、P=0.008)、直肠系膜筋膜浸润(HR=1.649、P=0.012)和距肛外缘距离(HR=0.638、P=0.041)均与DFS相关.结论 术前短程放疗联合化疗新辅助治疗老年人局部进展期直肠癌有良好的短期疗效和安全性.
Effect and safety of preoperative short-course radiotherapy combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for elderly patients with locally advanced rectal cancer
Objective To assess the impact of preoperative short-course radiotherapy combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy on elderly patients with locally advanced rectal cancer after a 2-year follow-up.Methods In this retrospective cohort study,we included 446 consecutive cases of elderly patients diagnosed and treated for locally advanced rectal cancer(stage Ⅱ-Ⅲ with T3-T4 and/or positive regional lymph nodes)at the First People's Hospital of Shangqiu city from January 2012 to December 2019.The patients were divided into two groups based on the treatment method:an observation group(107 cases)and a control group(339 cases).The patients in the observation group underwent preoperative short-course radiotherapy combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.The regimen included short-term radiotherapy(25 Gy over 1 week in 5 fractions)followed by 4 courses of chemotherapy(CAPOX regimen).On the other hand,the control group received concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy.The regimen involved 50 Gy over 5 weeks in 25 fractions and concurrent capecitabine chemotherapy.Afterward,total rectal mesentery resection was performed,and postoperatively,2 and 6 courses of CAPOX chemotherapy were continued.Follow-up was conducted until 31 December 2021,with the primary observation being the disease-free survival(DFS)of patients in both groups.Secondary observations included overall survival(OS)time,lesion progression-free survival(PFS)time,local recurrence rate,and the rate of acute toxicity events.Cox regression analyses were conducted to compare the factors influencing DFS.Results Among the 446 patients,303(67.9%)were male and 143(32.1%)were female.The patients in the observation group were found to be younger and had a higher proportion of Eastern Collaborative Oncology Group(ECOG)physical status score 0 compared to the control group(both P<0.05).Additionally,the two groups differed significantly in terms of MRI T stage,N stage,distance from the external anal verge,rectal mesorectal fascial infiltration,pathological stage,and chemotherapy-to-surgery time interval(all P<0.05).Throughout a mean follow-up period of(20.7±3.5)months,there were 76 deaths,89 distant metastases,and 32 local recurrences.The results of Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that the observation group had a higher disease-free survival(DFS)rate at 2 years of follow-up compared to the control group[73.8%(79/107)vs.68.1%(231/339),Log-rank x2=2.676,P=0.041].Additionally,the median DFS time was longer in the observation group[19(12,22)months]compared to the control group[16(11,19)months](Z=2.774,P=0.038).Furthermore,the observation group exhibited a significantly longer OS time[26(21,33)months]compared to the control group[22(18,14)months](Z=2.879,P=0.032).However,the median PFS time was similar in both groups[20(14,25)months vs.16(12,21)months](Z=1.545,P=0.123).The incidence of distant metastasis was 18.7%(20/107)in the observation group and 20.4%(69/339)in the control group(Log-rank x2=0.341,P=0.708),indicating no significant difference.Similarly,there was no significant difference in the risk of local recurrence between the observation group[9.3%(10/107)]and the control group[6.5%(22/339)](Log-rank x2=0.996,P=0.318).In terms of adverse reactions,there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of grade≥ 3 acute toxic reactions between the two groups[19.6%(21/107)vs.12.1%(41/339),Log-rank x2=1.661,P=0.148].A multifactorial Cox regression analysis revealed that age(HR=0.586,P=0.005),ECOG score(HR=0.721,P=0.028),MRI T-stage(HR=0.605,P=0.008),rectal mesenteric fascial infiltration(HR=1.649.P=0.012),and distance from the external anal verge(HR=0.638,P=0.041)were associated with DFS.Conclusions The findings indicate that the combination of preoperative short-course radiotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients with locally advanced rectal cancer demonstrates favorable short-term effectiveness and safety.This approach shows promise in improving outcomes for elderly patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Rectal neoplasmsRadiotherapyAntineoplastic combined chemotherapy protocolsPrognosis

侯良学、王红娜、卢渊全、刘俊启

展开 >

商丘市第一人民医院肿瘤放疗科,商丘 476100

郑州大学第一附属医院肿瘤放疗科,郑州 450052

直肠肿瘤 放射疗法 抗肿瘤联合化疗方案 预后

河南省医学科技攻关计划

SBGJ202003027

2024

中华老年医学杂志
中华医学会

中华老年医学杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.606
ISSN:0254-9026
年,卷(期):2024.43(3)
  • 17