首页|病原微生物宏基因二代测序对指导老年人社区获得性肺炎治疗的价值

病原微生物宏基因二代测序对指导老年人社区获得性肺炎治疗的价值

扫码查看
目的 探讨病原微生物宏基因二代测序(mNGS)对指导老年人社区获得性肺炎治疗的价值.方法 回顾性分析2020年10月至2021年12月福建医科大学附属协和医院呼吸内科收治的45例老年社区获得性肺炎患者的临床资料,所有患者均接受病原体常规方法及mNGS检测,分析患者病原学检测结果及抗感染方案调整依据、病情转归,按照肺炎严重指数(PSI)分为低危组(PSI 1~3级)30例、中高危组(PSI4~5级)15例,比较两组间治疗方案调整依据.结果 本研究中,mNGS检出率为91.1%(41/45),常规方法检出率为60.0%(27/45),检出率差异Kappa值为0.311,具有统计学意义(P=0.001).mNGS和常规方法均阳性病例仅24例,其中2例病原体完全一致、13例部分一致、9例完全不一致.26例按mNGS或mNGS+常规检测结果调整抗感染方案,21例治疗有效;而19例按常规检测结果调整方案或经验性治疗未调整方案的患者均治疗有效.此外,在中高危组患者(PSI 4~5级)中,依据mNGS结果调整治疗方案的患者所占比例更高[80.0%(12/15)比20.0%(3/15),x2=4.555、P=0.033];而未调整治疗或按常规结果治疗有效组主要为低危患者.结论 mNGS可作为老年人社区获得性肺炎病原学检测的有效补充手段,对指导老年社区获得性肺炎患者尤其中高危组(PSI 4~5级)有一定指导意义.
Value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in the elderly
Objective To explore the potential of metagenomic next-generation sequencing(mNGS)in guiding the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in elderly patients.Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 45 elderly patients(aged 60-89 years)with community-acquired pneumonia who were admitted to the department of respiratory medicine at Fujian Medical University Union Hospital from October 2020 to December 2021.All patients underwent pathogen testing using both conventional methods and mNGS.The analysis focused on the etiological detection results of the 45 elderly patients with community-acquired pneumonia,the basis for adjusting the anti-infection regimen,and the outcome of the disease.Based on the pneumonia severity index(PSI),30 cases were classified as low-risk(PSI 1-3),while 15 cases were classified as medium-high risk(PSI 4-5).The study compared the basis for adjusting the treatment plan between these two groups.Results In this study,the detection rate of mNGS was 91.1%(41/45),while the detection rate of the conventional method was 60.0%(27/45).The difference between the two methods was statistically significant(Kappa=0.311,P=0.001).Out of the 24 cases that tested positive for both mNGS and the conventional method,only 2 cases were completely consistent,13 cases were partially consistent,and 9 cases were completely inconsistent.Additionally,26 cases were adjusted based on mNGS or mNGS+routine test results,and 21 of these adjustments were effective.On the other hand,the treatment was effective in 19 patients whose regimens were adjusted based on routine test results or were not adjusted through empirical treatment.Furthermore,a higher proportion of patients in the intermediate-risk group(PSI grade 4-5)adjusted their treatment based on mNGS results compared to the unadjusted or conventionally treated group[80.0%(12/15)vs.20.0%(3/15),x2=4.555,P=0.033].However,the unadjusted or conventionally treated group primarily consisted of low-risk patients.Conclusions mNGS can serve as an effective supplement for detecting the cause of community-acquired pneumonia in elderly individuals.Furthermore,it holds significant value in guiding the management of elderly patients with community-acquired pneumonia,particularly those in the middle and high-risk group(PSI level 4-5).

PneumoniaCommunity-acquired infectionsMacrogene next-sequencing of pathogenic microorganismTherapy

施晓琪、田澜、吴佳宝、宋婉婷、陈丽敏

展开 >

福建医科大学附属协和医院呼吸内科,福州 350001

肺炎 社区获得性感染 病原微生物宏基因二代测序 治疗

2024

中华老年医学杂志
中华医学会

中华老年医学杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.606
ISSN:0254-9026
年,卷(期):2024.43(4)
  • 10