首页|疾病状态老年人的肾小球滤过率评估方程的恰当选择

疾病状态老年人的肾小球滤过率评估方程的恰当选择

扫码查看
目的 以动态肾脏成像作为参考标准,比较11个肾小球滤过率(GFR)方程在老年住院患者中的表现.方法 回顾性研究纳入北京医院2017年1月至2020年1月收治的年龄≥60岁的患者.通过动态肾脏成像对所有参与者进行GFR测量.估计的GFR(eGFR)是基于血清肌酐和(或)胱抑素C的不同方程计算得到:全年龄谱(FAS)、柏林倡议研究(BIS)、慢性肾病流行病学协作(CKD-EPI)、肾病饮食调整研究(MDRD)、中国的MDRD(MDRDc)和湘雅.结果 共纳入691例患者(383 例男性),年龄 60~90(71.9±7.7)岁.偏差(ml·min-1·1.73m-2)最小的是 FAScys(2.48)、FAScr-cys(3.07)、CKD-EPIcys(4.20)和 BIScr-cys(7.42).精准度(ml·min-1·1.73m-2)最大的是 BIScr-cys(10.38)、FAScr-cys(11.94)、FAScys(12.08)、CKD-EPIcr-cys(13.21)和 CKD-EPIcys(13.51).P30 最高的是 FAScr-cys(68.97%)、FAScys(68.96%)、CKD-EPIcys(63.22%)和BIScr-cys(61.67%).均方根误差(ml·min-1·1.73m-2)最低的是 BIScr-cys(9.73)、CKD-EPIcr-cys(10.98)、FAScr-cys(11.27)、CKD-EPIcys(11.52)的)和 FAScys(11.53).对男性而言,FAS 方程更加准确;女性中BIScr-cys和CKD-EPIcys更准确.慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者中,BIScr-cys、FAScys和 FAScr-cys 的 P30 分别为 86.96%、83.33%和 80.95%.对于 mGFR ≥ 30 ml/min 的患者,MDRDc的GFR高估最严重;对于mGFR<30 ml/min的患者,湘雅的GFR高估最严重.结论 BIScr-cys、FAScys和FAScr-cys在11个方程中表现出最好的准确性,可推荐给中国老年住院患者.
Selecting appropriate evaluation equations for assessing declining kidney function in aging individuals with disease conditions
Objective To compare the performance of 11 glomerular filtration rate(GFR)equations in Chinese elderly hospitalized patients using dynamic renal imaging as the reference standard.Methods The retrospective study involved patients aged 60 years and older who were admitted to Beijing Hospital between January,2017,and January 2020.Glomerular filtration rate(GFR)was assessed through dynamic renal imaging for all participants.Estimated GFR(eGFR)was calculated using various equations based on serum creatinine and/or cystatin C levels,including All Age Spectrum(FAS),Berlin Initiative Study(BIS),Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration(CKD-EPI),Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study(MDRD),MDRD in China(MDRDc),and Xiangya..Results A total of 691 patients,of which 383 were males,with an age range of 60 to 90 years(mean age 71.9±7.7 years),were included in the study.Among the different equations used to estimate glomerular filtration rate(GFR)in ml·min-1·1.73m-2,the smallest deviations were observed with FAScys(2.48),FAScr-cys(3.07),CKD-EPIcys(4.20),and BIScr-cys(7.42).Conversely,the most accurate estimations were found with BIScr-cys(10.38),FAScr-cys(11.94),FAScys(12.08),CKD-EPIcr-cys(13.21),and CKD-EPIcys(13.51).The highest P30 values,indicating the proportion of estimates within 30%of the true GFR,were achieved by FAScr-cys(68.97%),FAScys(68.96%),CKD-EPIcys(63.22%),and BIScr-cys(61.67%).The equations with the lowest root mean square errors were BIScr-cys(9.73),CKD-EPIcr-cys(10.98),FAScr-cys(11.27),CKD-EPIcys(11.52),and FAScys(11.53).Specifically,the FAS equation showed higher accuracy in men,while BIScr-cys and CKD-EPIcys were more accurate in women.Among patients with chronic kidney disease(CKD),the P30 values for BIScr-cys,FAScys,and FAScr-cys were 86.96%,83.33%,and 80.95%respectively.Notably,for patients with mGFR ≥ 30 ml/min,MDRDc overestimated GFR the most,whereas for patients with mGFR<30 ml/min,Xiangya exhibited the most significant overestimation of GFR.Conclusions Among the equations tested,BIScr-cys,FAScys,and FAScr-cys demonstrated the highest accuracy and are therefore recommended for use in Chinese elderly hospitalized patients.

Renal function assessmentDynamic renal imagingeGFR equationsElderly patients

徐冷楠、陈聪霞、孙颖、刘昕、陈爱群、毛永辉

展开 >

北京医院肾内科国家老年医学中心中国医学科学院老年医学研究院,北京 100730

北京医院核医学科国家老年医学中心 中国医学科学院老年医学研究院,北京 100730

肾功能评估 动态肾脏成像 eGFR方程 老年患者

北京市自然科学基金中央高水平医院临床科研业务费中央高水平医院临床科研业务费

7222159BJ-2022-129BJ-2022-105

2024

中华老年医学杂志
中华医学会

中华老年医学杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.606
ISSN:0254-9026
年,卷(期):2024.43(9)