首页|前列腺铥激光剜除术与等离子电切术治疗良性前列腺增生的对比研究

前列腺铥激光剜除术与等离子电切术治疗良性前列腺增生的对比研究

扫码查看
目的:探讨前列腺铥激光剜除术(ThuLEP)与等离子电切术(PKRP)治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)的对比研究.方法:回顾性研究本院2021 年1 月至2023 年12 月收治的160 例BPH患者病历资料,根据手术方式的不同将患者分为观察组(n=80)和对照组(n=80).对照组实施PKRP治疗,观察组实施ThuLEP治疗.比较两组的手术时间、膀胱冲洗时间、导管留置时间、住院时间,并比较两组术前、术后 3 个月的最大尿流速(Qmax)、残余尿量(PVR)、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、前列腺体积的变化情况和术后并发症.结果:观察组的手术时间、膀胱冲洗时间、导管留置时间、住院时间[(60.10±5.15)min、(43.24±6.65)h、(5.03±1.24)d、(6.55±1.67)d]均短于对照组[(67.25±7.24)min、(46.90±10.77)h、(5.60±1.31)d、(7.31±2.00)d,P<0.05)];观察组术后3 个月的Qmax水平[(20.68±1.45)ml/s]高于对照组[(18.50±1.24)ml/s],PVR、PSA、前列腺体积水平[(10.82±3.10)ml、(3.38±0.40)μg/L、(20.12±5.13)ml]均低于对照组[(12.10±3.53)ml、(4.60±0.78)μg/L、(25.35±6.46)ml,P<0.05)];两组术后并发症的总发生率(7.50%vs 5.00%),无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论:ThuLEP治疗BPH具有显著疗效,能够缩减手术及住院时长,改善尿流动力学和前列腺功能,值得推广.
Thulium laser enucleation versus plasma kinetic resection of the prostate in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia
Objective:To compare thulium laser enucleation of the prostate(ThuLEP)with plasma kinetic resection of the prostate(PKRP)in the treatment of BPH.Methods:We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 160 cases of BPH treated by ThuLEP(the observation group,n=80)or PKRP(the control group,n=80)in our hospital from January 2021 to December 2023.We recorded the operation time,bladder irrigation time,catheter retention time,hospitalization time,postoperative complica-tions,and pre-and postoperative maximum urinary flow rate(Qmax),residual urine volume(PVR),prostate-specific antigen(PSA)and prostate volume,followed by comparison of the data obtained between the two groups of patients.Results:Compared with the controls,the patients of the observation group showed significantly shorter operation time([67.25±7.24]vs[60.10±5.15]min,P<0.05),bladder irrigation time([46.90±10.77]vs[43.24±6.65]h,P<0.05),catheterization time([5.60±1.31]vs[5.03±1.24]d,P<0.05)and hospitalization time([7.31±2.00]vs[6.55±1.67]d,P<0.05),higher Qmax([18.50±1.24]vs[20.68±1.45]ml/s,P<0.05),lower PVR([12.10±3.53]vs[10.82±3.10]ml,P<0.05),PSA([4.60±0.78]vs[3.38±0.40]μg/L,P<0.05)and prostate volume([25.35±6.46]vs[20.12±5.13]ml,P<0.05)at 3 months after surgery,but no statistically significant difference in the total incidence of postoperative complications(7.50%[6/80]vs 5.00%[4/80],P>0.05).Conclusion:ThuLEP,with its advantages of notable effect,short operation and hospitaliza-tion time,significant improvement of urinary flow dynamics and prostate function,deserves clinical promotion for the treatment of BPH.

benign prostatic hyperplasiathulium laser enucleation of the prostateplasma kinetic resection of the prostatecomplication

张卫东、王文佳、宋志强、马哲、张佳伟、王浩浩、吴建臣

展开 >

清华大学第一附属医院泌尿外科,北京 100016

良性前列腺增生 前列腺铥激光剜除术 等离子电切术 并发症

2024

中华男科学杂志
南京军区南京总医院

中华男科学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.052
ISSN:1009-3591
年,卷(期):2024.30(6)
  • 14