首页|电生理技术治疗慢性前列腺炎的临床疗效观察

电生理技术治疗慢性前列腺炎的临床疗效观察

扫码查看
目的:观察电生理技术治疗慢性前列腺炎的临床效果.方法:选取2022 年1 月至2023 年4 月就诊于我院和贵州省人民医院(合作治疗组)符合纳入标准的40 例慢性前列腺炎/慢性骨盆疼痛综合征(CP/CPPS)患者,随机分为对照组(n=20)和治疗组(n=20),治疗组采用低频神经肌肉电刺激联合药物治疗,对照组采取单纯药物治疗,对比分析治疗前后患者前列腺炎症症状评分(NIH-CPSI)、国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)改善情况.结果:共完成并随访37 例患者(治疗组退出1 例,因对电极片过敏;对照组有 2 例丢失随访),两组患者基线资料比较,无显著差异(P>0.05);两组患者治疗前后NIH-CPSI评分和IPSS评分比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);比较两组患者治疗后IPSS评分,治疗组降低(15.84±0.92)分,对照组(7.17±0.40)分,两组比较,差异具有统计学意义(t=4.792,P<0.05);比较两组患者治疗后NIH-CPSI评分,治疗组平均降低(17.47±0.92)分,对照组(10.56±0.49)分,两组比较,差异具有统计学意义(t=6.654,P<0.05).结论:电生理联合药物治疗效果明显优于单纯药物治疗,电生理治疗慢性前列腺炎临床疗效确切,值得推广应用.
Electrophysiological technique for treatment of chronic prostatiti:Curative effect observation
Objective:To observe the clinical effect of electrophysiological technique in treating chronic prostatitis.Meth-ods:Choose 40 patients of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome(chronicprostatis/chronicpelvicpainsyndrome,CP/CPPS)in People's Hospital in Zhijin and People's hospital in Guizhou Province from January 2022 to April 2023,The patients were randomly divided into control group(n=20)and treatment group(n=20).The treatment group received low-frequency neuromuscular electri-cal stimulation combined with drug therapy,while the control group received drug therapy alone.The improvement of prostatitis symp-tom score(NIH-CPSI)and International Prostatitis Symptom score(IPSS)before and after treatment was compared and analyzed.Results:A total of 37 patients were followed up(1 patient in the treatment group withdrew due to hypersensitivity to the electrode;2 patients in the control group were lost to follow-up.)There was no significant difference in baseline data between the two groups(P>0.05).The NIH-CPSI score and IPSS score before and after treatment were compared between the two groups,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The IPSS score of the two groups after treatment was compared,the average reduction of the treat-ment group was15.84±0.92 points,and that of the control group was7.17±0.40 points,and the difference was statistically signifi-cant(t=4.792,P<0.05).The NIH-CPSI score of the two groups after treatment was compared,and the average reduction was 17.47±0.92 points in the treatment group and 10.56±0.49 points in the control group.The difference between the two groups was statistically significant(t=6.654,P<0.05).Conclusion:The effect of electrophysiological combined drug therapy is obviously better than that of simple drug therapy.Electrophysiological therapy for chronic prostatitis has definite clinical effect and is worth pro-moting and applying.

chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndromeelectrophysiologyChronic Prostate Symptom ScoreInternational Prostate Symptom Score

王松、胡建新、汪珊、彭超、蔡季、丁敏

展开 >

贵州医科大学附属医院织金医院泌尿男科,贵州 织金 552100

贵州省人民医院泌尿外科,贵州 贵阳 550000

慢性前列腺炎/慢性盆腔疼痛综合征 电生理 慢性前列腺症状评分 国际前列腺症状评分

国家卫生健康委医药卫生科技发展研究中心项目

HDSL202001028

2024

中华男科学杂志
南京军区南京总医院

中华男科学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.052
ISSN:1009-3591
年,卷(期):2024.30(7)
  • 11