首页|基于流固耦合的膀胱颈角对排尿影响程度的应用研究

基于流固耦合的膀胱颈角对排尿影响程度的应用研究

扫码查看
目的:本研究利用膀胱颈角(BNA)评估膀胱颈开口变形程度,并通过流固耦合分析,评估膀胱颈角对排尿的影响.方法:建立理想化的膀胱、前列腺及尿道的几何模型:BNA正常模型、BNA增大模型.通过流固耦合模拟尿液在膀胱、膀胱颈、尿道内的流速和压力变化及前列腺的位移,评估BNA变化对尿流的影响.回顾性分析2020年6月至2023年6月期间145例就诊于河北医科大学第二医院泌尿外科的下尿路症状患者,根据患者是否合并急性尿潴留(AUR),将其分为AUR组(39例)和无AUR组(106例),并根据前列腺体积及尿流率大小分组,评估BNA对排尿的影响.结果:通过对BNA正常模型与BNA增大模型对比仿真分析发现两组模型流体域总压及流速分布有明显差异(P<0.05),前列腺位移最大的部位为膀胱颈部,BNA正常模型膀胱颈部位移较小且尿道内径未发生变化,BNA增大模型膀胱颈部位移更大且尿道开口内径缩小.通过流固耦合结果分析证明BNA增大对排尿有显著影响.AUR组与无AUR组间PSA、TPV、TZV、IPSS、Qmax、IPP、PUA、BNA存在明显差异(P<0.05).按照尿流率大小分为3组,各组平均BNA:Qmax<10 ml/s组为83.7°±2.5°、Qmax 10~15ml/s组为67.5°±1.8°,Qmax>15ml/s组为65.1°±4.8°,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).使用非参数秩和检验组间对比,Qmax<10ml/s组BNA与另外两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).良性前列腺增生分组各组平均BNA:Ⅳ度组为105.8°±6.0°,Ⅲ 度组为 82.8°±3.5°,Ⅱ 度组为 71.5°±2.0°,Ⅰ 度组为 67.2°±3.1°,正常组为 65.0°±3.7°(P<0.05),正常组、Ⅰ度组、Ⅱ度组的组间BNA差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),Ⅲ度组、Ⅳ度组的组间BNA差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),Ⅲ度组、Ⅳ度组分别与正常组、Ⅰ度组、Ⅱ度组之间BNA差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).Spearman相关因素分析结果显示BNA与TPV、TZV、IPP、PUA、IPSS、Qmax之间存在很强的相关性(P<0.05).结论:BNA的改变会对排尿造成影响,且与良性前列腺增生严重程度关系密切.BNA可能是评估良性前列腺增生患者下尿路症状严重程度的重要的解剖学因素.
Impact of bladder-neck angle on urination:An application study based on fluid-structure interaction
Objective:To assess the deformation of the bladder-neck opening and the impact of the bladder-neck angle(BNA)on urination in male patients by fluid-structure interaction(FSI)analysis.Methods:We established geometric models of the blad-der,prostate and urethra were established,incorporating both normal and enlarged BNAs,and assessed the effects of BNA alteration on urinary flow by FSI simulation of the flow rate and pressure of the urine within the bladder,bladder neck and urethra,and that of pros-tate displacement as well.We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data on 145 male patients from the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University between June 2020 and June 2023,39 with acute urine retention(the AUR group)and 106 without(the non-AUR group),and evaluate the impact of BNA on urination based on the urinary flow rate and prostate volume.Results:Comparative simulation a-nalysis showed significant differences in the total urethral pressure and flow rate between the normal and enlarged BNA models(P<0.05).The maximum prostate displacement was found at the bladder neck,with moderate displacement and unchanged urethral diame-ter in the normal BNA model,but significant displacement and a reduced urethral opening diameter in the enlarged BNA model.FSI analysis confirmed an evident impact of enlarged BNA on urination,more significant in the AUR than in the non-AUR patients(P<0.05).The BNAs in the patients with the maximum urinary flow rate(Qmax)of<10,10-15 or>15 ml/s were 83.7°±2.5°,67.5°±1.8° and 65.1°±4.8° respectively,with statistically significant difference between the former one and the latter two groups(P<0.05).The BNAs in the patients with normal prostate volume or BPH of grade Ⅰ,Ⅱ,Ⅲ or Ⅳ were 65.0°±3.7°,67.2°±3.1°,71.5°±2.0°,82.8°±3.5° and 105.8°±6.0°,respectively(P<0.05),with statistically significant difference between BPH grades Ⅲ and Ⅳ(P<0.05)as well as between these two and the other three groups(P<0.05),but not among the normal prostate volume,BPH grade Ⅰ and BPH grade Ⅱ groups(P>0.05).Spearman correlation analysis indicated that BNA was strongly correlated with total prostate volume(TPV),transition zone volume(TZV),intravesical prostatic protrusion(IPP),prostatic urethral angle(PUA),IPSS,and Qmax(P<0.05).Conclusion:Changes in BNA affect urination and are closely associated with the se-verity of prostate hyperplasia.The BNA may be an important anatomical factor for assessing the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms in BPH patients.

bladder-neck anglefluid-structure interactioncomputational fluid dynamicsbenign prostatic hyperplasia

贾旭东、郭小皖、张婉泽、路丽娟、王亚轩、刘凯隆、王东彬、柳跃鹏、齐进春

展开 >

河北医科大学第二医院泌尿外科,河北石家庄 050000

河北省人民医院医学影像科,河北石家庄 050000

河北医科大学,河北石家庄 050000

石家庄市食品药品检验中心,河北石家庄 050000

展开 >

膀胱颈角 流固耦合 计算流体力学 良性前列腺增生

河北省医学科学研究课题计划

20200964

2024

中华男科学杂志
南京军区南京总医院

中华男科学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.052
ISSN:1009-3591
年,卷(期):2024.30(9)
  • 2