首页|单节段椎旁神经阻滞在老年患者腹股沟疝修补术中的应用

单节段椎旁神经阻滞在老年患者腹股沟疝修补术中的应用

扫码查看
目的 探讨单节段椎旁神经阻滞(pavavertebral nerve block,PVNB)在老年患者腹股沟疝修补术中应用的安全性和可行性。方法 回顾性分析2016 年1 月~2022 年 12 月 58 例老年患者接受开放式无张力腹股沟疝修补术的临床资料,依据麻醉方式分为2 组:单节段PVNB组(P组)和单次蛛网膜下腔阻滞组(S组),每组29 例。P组在超声联合外周神经刺激器或单纯外周神经刺激器引导下行L1 单节段PVNB,给予0。4%罗哌卡因20 ml。S组在L3/4棘突间隙进行穿刺,给予0。5%布比卡因10 mg。记录患者麻醉前(T0)、手术切皮时(T1)、疝囊剥离时(T2)和关切口时(T3)患者的平均动脉压和心率,麻醉阻滞平面、麻醉效果、芬太尼补救率、局麻药毒性反应、外周神经损伤、尿潴留、谵妄和恶心呕吐的发生情况,随访患者的麻醉满意度。结果 58 例均顺利完成手术。2 组患者麻醉阻滞平面差异有显著性(Z =-4。144,P =0。000),芬太尼补救率、麻醉效果和麻醉满意度差异均无统计学意义(χ2 =0。269,P =0。604;Z =-1。430,P =0。153;Z =-1。395,P =0。163)。2 组患者不同时点的平均动脉压和心率变化差异无统计学意义(F =0。002,P =0。960;F =0。260,P =0。612)。P组患者尿潴留发生率显著低于S组(0。0%vs。24。1%,Fisher精确检验,P =0。010)。2 组患者谵妄和恶心呕吐发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0。05)。所有患者围术期均未发生局麻药毒性反应和外周神经损伤。结论 单节段PVNB可以为接受腹股沟疝修补术的老年患者提供完善的麻醉与镇痛,有助于维持术中血流动力学状态的稳定,并降低术后不良反应的发生风险。
Application of Single-segment Paravertebral Nerve Block in Elderly Patients Undergoing Inguinal Hernioplasty
Objective To explore the safety and feasibility of single-segment paravertebral nerve block(PVNB)in elderly patients undergoing inguinal hernioplasty.Methods A retrospective analysis was made on clinical data of 58 elderly patients who underwent open tension-free inguinal hernioplasty from January 2016 to December 2022.According to the anesthesia method,they were divided into two groups with 29 cases in each:single-segment PVNB group(P group)and single subarachnoid block group(S group).Patients in the P group were given L1 single-segment PVNB guided by ultrasound combined with peripheral nerve stimulators or simple peripheral nerve stimulators by using 0.4%ropivacaine 20 ml.Patients in the S group underwent puncture in the interspinous space between L3/4 and received 0.5%bupivacaine 10 mg.The mean arterial pressure and heart rate before anesthesia(T0),at the time of skin incision(T1),at the time of hernia sac dissection(T2),and at the time of wound closure(T3)were recorded,and the block levels,anesthetic effect,remedial rate of fentanyl,local anesthetic toxicity,peripheral nerve injury,urinary retention,delirium,and nausea and vomiting of the patients were recorded.The patient's satisfaction with anesthesia was followed up.Results All the 58 patients underwent surgery smoothly.The difference in block levels was statistically significant between the two groups of patients(Z =-4.144,P =0.000),while the differences in the remedial rate of fentanyl,anesthesia effect,and anesthesia satisfaction were not statistically significant(χ2 =0.269,P =0.604;Z =-1.430,P =0.153;Z =-1.395,P =0.163).There were no statistically significant differences in mean arterial pressure and heart rate changes between the two groups at different time points(F =0.002,P = 0.960;F =0.260,P =0.612).The rate of urinary retention in the P group was significantly lower than that in the S group(0.0%vs.24.1%,Fisher's test,P =0.010).There were no statistically significant differences in rates of dilirium and nausea and vomitting(P>0.05).All the patients did not experience local anesthetic toxicity or peripheral nerve injury during the perioperative period.Conclusion Single-segment PVNB can provide comprehensive anesthesia and analgesia for elderly patients undergoing inguinal hernioplasty,helping to maintain the stability of intraoperative hemodynamics and reducing the risk of postoperative adverse reactions.

Paravertebral nerve blockSubarachnoid blockInguinal hernioplasty

魏滨、李斌龙、徐懋、郭向阳

展开 >

北京大学第三医院麻醉科 北京市临床麻醉质量控制和改进中心,北京 100191

椎旁神经阻滞 蛛网膜下腔阻滞 腹股沟疝修补术

科技创新2030

2021ZD0204300

2024

中国微创外科杂志
北京大学

中国微创外科杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:2.21
ISSN:1009-6604
年,卷(期):2024.24(2)
  • 13