Comparison of Anterior-posterior and Posterior-anterior Internal Fixation With Screws for Posterior Malleolar Fractures in Trimalleolar Fractures
Objective To compare the efficacy of anterior-posterior and posterior-anterior screw fixation for posterior malleolar fractures surgery.Methods A retrospective analysis of 376 cases of posterior malleolar fractures treated with lag screws from January 2011 to October 2022 with more than 12 months of follow-up period was conducted.The patients were divided into two subgroups based on the thickness of the fracture fragment,with 167 cases in the small fracture subgroup having a fracture fragment thickness＜17 mm(screw thread length)and 209 cases in the large fracture subgroup having a fracture fragment thickness ≥ 17 mm.Each subgroup was further divided into anterior-posterior and posterior-anterior groups based on the direction of screw fixation in the posterior malleolar fracture surgery.In the small fracture subgroups,there were 74 cases in the anterior-posterior group and 93 cases in the posterior-anterior group.In the large fracture subgroup,there were 88 cases in the anterior-posterior group and 121 cases in the posterior-anterior group.The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society(AOFAS)ankle-hindfoot score was measured at the last follow-up.The displacement of the fracture fragment in the direction of the fracture line(Dn)and perpendicular to the fracture line(Dt)were measured on the first day after surgery and at the last follow-up,and the displacement of the fracture fragment was calculated,which was the difference between Dn+Dt at the last follow-up and Dn+Dt on the first day after surgery.Results On the first day after surgery,X-ray showed no significant difference in Dn and Dt between the anterior-posterior and posterior-anterior groups in both of the small and large fracture subgroups(P＞0.05).The entire group was followed up for 12-85 months,with an average of 19.3 months.In the small fracture subgroup,the displacement of the fracture fragment in the posterior-anterior group[(0.11±0.19)mm]was superior to that in the anterior-posterior group[(0.19±0.21)mm;P=0.011],and the AOFAS score was also superior to that in the anterior-posterior group[(80.2±8.4)points vs.(76.2±8.6)points,P=0.003].In the large fracture subgroup,there was no significant difference in fracture displacement between the posterior-anterior group[(0.11±0.18)mm]and the anterior-posterior group[(0.12±0.19)mm;P=0.630],and there was also no significant difference in AOFAS scores[(84.1±7.8)points vs.(82.8±7.6)points,P=0.246].Conclusions There is no significant difference in the reduction effect between anterior-posterior and posterior-anterior lag screw internal fixation for posterior malleolar fractures in trimalleolar fractures.For patients with fracture thickness＜17 mm,posterior-anterior fixation is superior to anterior-posterior fixation;for patients with fracture thickness ≥17 mm,there is no significant difference in the efficacy between anterior-posterior and posterior-anterior fixation.
Posterior malleolar fractureLag screwInternal fixationAnterior to posteriorPosterior to anterior
万方数据
维普
