首页|股骨颈动力交叉钉系统与空心加压螺钉治疗中青年Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折的疗效比较

股骨颈动力交叉钉系统与空心加压螺钉治疗中青年Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折的疗效比较

扫码查看
目的 比较股骨颈动力交叉钉系统(femoral neck system,FNS)与空心加压螺钉(cannulated compression screws,CCS)治疗中青年Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折的疗效。方法 回顾性分析2019年1月~2022年8月103例中青年Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折的临床资料,根据手术方式不同分为股骨颈动力交叉钉系统FNS组(n=54)和空心加压螺钉CCS组(n=49)。比较2组术中出血量、手术时间、术后骨折复位质量(Garden对位指数)、骨折愈合时间、术后下地负重时间、术后并发症、股骨颈短缩长度、颈干角变化(术后即刻与末次随访时颈干角差值)和髋关节Harris评分。结果 FNS组手术时间[(46。7±12。3)min vs。(69。7±14。1)min,t=-8。840,P=0。000]、术后下地负重时间[(11。5±2。7)周 vs。(15。7±3。2)周,t=-7。124,P=0。000]、骨折愈合时间[(3。7±0。8)月 vs。(4。3±0。9)月,t=-3。625,P=0。001]、并发症发生率[1。8%(1/54)vs。14。3%(7/49),x2=3。944,P=0。047]均显著短于/低于CCS组。2组术中出血量、骨折复位质量、随访时间及颈干角变化无统计学差异(P>0。05)。髋关节 Harris 评分术后 3 个月[(84。5±3。9)分 vs。(82。7±4。4)分,t=2。212,P=0。029]、术后 6个月[(91。4±4。4)分 vs。(89。7±4。0)分,t=2。119,P=0。037]和术后 1 年[(96。0±2。8)分 vs。(94。8±3。1)分,t=2。029,P=0。045]均显著高于 CCS 组。末次随访 FNS 组股骨颈短缩长度[(4。6±2。8)mm vs。(5。9±3。3)mm,t=-2。165,P=0。033]显著小于CCS组。结论 与CCS比较,FNS内固定治疗中青年Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折疗效显著,骨折愈合时间短,可有效改善髋关节功能,促进髋关节活动康复,降低术后并发症发生率。
Comparison of Femoral Neck System and Cannulated Compression Screw in the Treatment of Pauwels Type Ⅲ Femoral Neck Fractures in Young and Middle-aged Patients
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of the femoral neck system(FNS)and cannulated compression screw(CCS)in the treatment of Pauwels type Ⅲ femoral neck fractures in young and middle-aged patients.Methods We retrospectively studied 103 clinical cases of young and middle-aged patients with Pauwels type Ⅲ femoral neck fractures who were treated with internal fixation surgery between January 2019 and August 2022.According to different surgical methods,they were divided into FNS group(54 cases)and CCS group(49 cases).The intraoperative bleeding volume,operation time,quality of fracture reduction(Garden alignment index),bone healing time,postoperative weight-bearing time,postoperative complications,shortening length of femoral neck,change of femoral neck-shaft angle(difference between immediately after operation and at the last follow-up),and Harris hip score were compared between the two groups.Results Compared to the CCS group,the FNS group had significantly shorter operation time[(46.7±12.3)min vs.(69.7±14.1)min,t=-8.840,P=0.000],reduced postoperative weight-bearing time[(11.5±2.7)weeks vs.(15.7±3.2)weeks,t=-7.124,P=0.000],shorter fracture healing time[(3.7±0.8)months vs.(4.3±0.9)months,t=-3.625,P=0.001],and significantly lower incidence of complications[1.8%(1/54)vs.14.3%(7/49),x2=3.944,P=0.047].The FNS group also demonstrated significantly higher Harris hip scores at 3 months[(84.5±3.9)points vs.(82.7±4.4)points,t=2.212,P=0.029],6 months[(91.4±4.4)points vs.(89.7±4.0)points,t=2.119,P=0.037],and 1 year[(96.0±2.8)points vs.(94.8±3.1)points,t=2.029,P=0.045]postoperatively compared to the CCS group.At the last follow-up,the FNS group showed significantly shorter femoral neck shortening[(4.6±2.8)mm vs.(5.9±3.3)mm,t=2.165,P=0.033]compared to the CCS group.Conclusions Compared to CCS,FNS shows better efficacy in the internal fixation of Pauwels type Ⅲ femoral neck fractures with a shorter bone healing time.With the application of FNS,the rehabilitation of the hip joint is promoted,and the hip joint function is effectively improved,as well as the incidence of postoperative complications is reduced.

Femoral neck fractureFracture internal fixationFemoral neck systemCannulated compression screw

朱春晖、刘刚、陈伟

展开 >

南京医科大学附属常州第二人民医院创伤中心,常州 213003

股骨颈骨折 骨折内固定术 股骨颈动力交叉钉系统 空心加压螺钉

常州市科技计划资助常州市科技计划资助常州市卫生与健康委员会青年人才科技项目常州市卫生健康青苗人才工程常州市卫生健康人才国外研修资助项目

CJ20220072CJ20230070QN202118CZQM2022009GW2023021

2024

中国微创外科杂志
北京大学

中国微创外科杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:2.21
ISSN:1009-6604
年,卷(期):2024.24(9)