中国微创外科杂志2024,Vol.24Issue(10) :657-661.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2024.10.001

超声引导射频消融联合泡沫硬化剂注射治疗原发性小隐静脉曲张

Ultrasound-guided Radiofrequency Ablation Combined With Injection of Foam Sclerosing in the Treatment of Primary Small Saphenous Vein Varicosities

崔智淼 陈占 刘军 林瑞敏 李天润
中国微创外科杂志2024,Vol.24Issue(10) :657-661.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2024.10.001

超声引导射频消融联合泡沫硬化剂注射治疗原发性小隐静脉曲张

Ultrasound-guided Radiofrequency Ablation Combined With Injection of Foam Sclerosing in the Treatment of Primary Small Saphenous Vein Varicosities

崔智淼 1陈占 1刘军 1林瑞敏 1李天润2
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 北京市海淀医院血管外科,北京 100080
  • 2. 北京市海淀医院血管外科,北京 100080;北京大学第三医院介入血管外科,北京 100191
  • 折叠

摘要

目的 探讨超声引导射频消融联合泡沫硬化剂注射治疗原发性小隐静脉曲张的有效性和安全性.方法 对2021年11月~2022年11月我科46例原发性小隐静脉曲张进行回顾性分析,由患者选择手术方式,行射频消融联合硬化剂注射(观察组)和小隐静脉高位结扎剥脱(对照组)各23例.比较2组手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、静脉临床严重程度评分(Venous Clinical Severity Score,VCSS)、并发症、治疗满意度和复发情况.结果 与对照组相比,观察组手术时间短[(56.1±6.0)min vs.(81.7±10.6)min,t=-10.128,P=0.000],出血量少[(27.0±4.1)ml vs.(41.4±4.8)ml,t=-11.016,P=0.000],住院时间短[(2.0±0.7)d vs.(5.6±0.9)d,t=-14.319,P=0.000],术后 3、6、12 个月 VCSS 评分低[(7.4±2.0)分 vs.(8.9±2.5)分,t=-2.165,P=0.036;(5.3±1.8)分 vs.(6.5±2.2)分,t=-2.149,P=0.037;(2.6±1.3)分vs.(4.0±1.8)分,t-2.912,P=0.006],满意度高(满意、基本满意、不满意观察组为18、4、1例,对照组为8、10、5例,Z=-2.967,P=0.003).2组术后并发症发生率及术后12个月复发率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 超声引导射频消融联合泡沫硬化剂注射治疗原发性小隐静脉曲张是安全、有效的.

Abstract

Objective To explore the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation combined with foam sclerotherapy in the treatment of primary small saphenous vein varicosities.Methods A total of 46 patients with primary small saphenous vein varicosities in our department from November 2021 to November 2022 were retrospectively analyzed.Depending on the patient's choice of surgical method,they underwent radiofrequency ablation combined with sclerotherapy(observation group,n=23)or high ligation and stripping of the saphenous vein(control group,n=23).The surgical time,intraoperative blood loss,length of hospital stay,postoperative Venous Clinical Severity Score(VCSS),incidence of postoperative complications,treatment satisfaction,and recurrence were compared between the two groups.Results Compared with the control group,the observation group had shorter surgical time[(56.1±6.0)min vs.(81.7±10.6)min,t=-10.128,P=0.000],less intraoperative blood loss[(27.0±4.1)ml vs.(41.4±4.8)ml,t=-11.016,P=0.000],shorter hospitalization time[(2.0±0.7)dvs.(5.6±0.9)d,t=-14.319,P=0.000],lower VCSS scores at 3,6,and 12 months after surgery[(7.4±2.0)points vs.(8.9±2.5)points,t=-2.165,P=0.036;(5.3±1.8)points vs.(6.5±2.2)points,t=-2.149,P=0.037;(2.6±1.3)points vs.(4.0±1.8)points,t=-2.912,P=0.006],higher satisfaction[satisfied,somewhat satisfied,dissatisfied in 18,4,and 1 cases in the observation group and 8,10,and 5 cases in the control group,respectively,Z=-2.967,P=0.003].There were no statistically significant differences in the complication incidence and recurrence rate between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation combined with foam sclerotherapy in the treatment of primary small saphenous vein varicosities is safe and effective.

关键词

小隐静脉曲张/射频消融/泡沫硬化治疗

Key words

Small saphenous vein varicosities/Radiofrequency ablation/Foam sclerotherapy

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
中国微创外科杂志
北京大学

中国微创外科杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:2.21
ISSN:1009-6604
段落导航相关论文