首页|文人琴与艺人琴划分中的几个问题——兼答姚锡安、荣鸿曾先生

文人琴与艺人琴划分中的几个问题——兼答姚锡安、荣鸿曾先生

扫码查看
回顾"文人琴"与"艺人琴"提出的过程,就学界对此种划分存在的误解和提出的质疑,归纳成几个问题,如:"文人琴"与"艺人琴"的划分是否可行;"职业"在说明这两个传统时意义如何;琴乐的娱人和娱己功能,意义有多大;"文人琴"与"艺人琴"有无相通之处,又如何相通;古琴要不要发展,又是什么意义上的发展;琴乐的"表现性"究竟何属;等等,并逐一加以解答.
A comprehensive academic review of the process of introducing the classification of"literati qin"and"artisan qin"and addressing misunderstandings and criticisms in academia reveals several key issues.These include:the feasibility of distinguishing between literati qin and artisan qin,the role of the concept of"profession"in understanding these traditions,the significance of the entertainment functions of qin music for both the audience and the performer,potential similarities between literati qin and artisan qin,and how these similarities manifest.Additionally,considerations about the pursuit of the development of ancient qin and the meaning of development in this context will be explored.Furthermore,the precise interpretation of the term"expressiveness"in qin music will be investigated systematically.

Literati QinArtisan QinTradition of Qin

刘承华

展开 >

周口师范学院音乐舞蹈学院

南京艺术学院音乐学院

文人琴 艺人琴 古琴传统

2024

中国音乐
中国音乐学院

中国音乐

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.372
ISSN:1002-9923
年,卷(期):2024.(2)
  • 24