A comprehensive academic review of the process of introducing the classification of"literati qin"and"artisan qin"and addressing misunderstandings and criticisms in academia reveals several key issues.These include:the feasibility of distinguishing between literati qin and artisan qin,the role of the concept of"profession"in understanding these traditions,the significance of the entertainment functions of qin music for both the audience and the performer,potential similarities between literati qin and artisan qin,and how these similarities manifest.Additionally,considerations about the pursuit of the development of ancient qin and the meaning of development in this context will be explored.Furthermore,the precise interpretation of the term"expressiveness"in qin music will be investigated systematically.