首页|家庭医生签约糖尿病患者就诊连续性与糖化血红蛋白管理情况的关联性研究

家庭医生签约糖尿病患者就诊连续性与糖化血红蛋白管理情况的关联性研究

扫码查看
目的 分析家庭医生签约糖尿病患者就诊连续性与糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)管理情况的关联性.方法 该研究为横断面研究.2022年5-10月,通过方便抽样在北京市城区选取3家社区卫生服务中心,采用随机数字表法在所选取社区家庭医生签约糖尿病患者中共抽取360例,通过机构电子信息系统收集数据,包括患者基本信息、2021年度家庭医生连续性比例(UPC)以及2021年度HbA1c监测与控制相关评价指标.比较不同就诊连续性患者HbA1c监测与控制情况,采用卡方检验及logistic回归分析HbA1c管理情况(即HbA1c监测与控制情况)与就诊连续性的关联性.结果 360例患者中,男性167例(46.4%),年龄68.0(60.0,74.0)岁,糖尿病病程11.0(7.0,17.0)年.UPC评分<30%者 159例(44.1%),30%~50%者 101 例(28.1%),>50%者 100例(27.8%).HbA1c监测达标率为 66.4%(239/360),HbA1c控制达标率为45.8%(165/360).UPC 评分<30%、30%~50%、>50%三组的HbA1c 监测达标率分别为 53.5%(85/159)、73.3%(74/101)、80.0%(80/100),HbA1c 控制达标率分别为37.7%(60/159)、51.5%(52/101)、53.0%(53/100),差异均有统计学意义(x2=22.36、7.57,P<0.05).患者UPC 评分增加,其 HbA1c 监测(OR=1.020,95%CI:1.009~1.030,P<0.001)与控制(OR=1.012,95%CI:1.003~1.02 1,P=0.008)达标的可能性均增加.结论 家庭医生签约糖尿病患者就诊连续性与HbAlc管理情况存在关联性.
Association between the continuity of consultation for diabetes patients contracted by family doctors and the management of glycosylated hemoglobin
Objective To analyze the association between continuity of consultation and the management of glycosylated hemoglobin(HbA1c)in diabetes patients contracted by family doctors.Methods This study was a cross-sectional study.From May 2022 to October 2022,three community health service centers in the urban area of Beijing were selected by convenient sampling.A total of 360 diabetes patients were selected by simple random sampling from the selected centers.Extraction of data from electronic health records were conducted to collect patient characteristics,information on the continuity evaluation indicators for patient visits(usual provider of care,UPC)in 2021 and information of monitoring and control indicators for HbA1c in 2021.The monitoring and control of HbA1c in patients with different continuity of consultations were compared.Chi-square test and logistic regression analysis were used to determine the association between continuity of consultation and HbA1c management(i.e.,HbA1c monitoring and control).Results Of the 360 patients,167(46.4%)were male;the age was 68.0(60.0,74.0)years and the number of years since diagnosis was 11.0(7.0,17.0)years.One hundred and fifty-nine patients(44.1%)had UPC scores below 30%,101 patients(28.1%)had UPC scores between 30%and 50%,and 100 patients(27.8%)had UPC scores above 50%.The compliance rate for HbA1c monitoring was 66.4%(239/360),and the compliance rate for HbA1c control was 45.8%(165/360).When the UPC score was less than 30%,between 30%-50%,and greater than 50%,the HbA1c monitoring compliance rates were 53.5%(85/159),73.3%(74/101),and 80.0%(80/100),respectively,and the HbA1c control compliance rates were 37.7%(60/159),51.5%(52/101),and 53.0%(53/100),respectively,and the differences were statistically significant(x2=22.36,7.57,P<0.05).As the UPC score increased,the likelihood of achieving HbA1c monitoring(OR=1.020,95%CI:1.009-1.030,P<0.001)and control(OR=1.012,95%CI:1.003-1.021,P=0.008)targets increased.Conclusion There is an association between the continuity of consultation and the management of HbA1c.

DiabetesChronic disease managementPrimary careFamily doctorHealth services continuity

王飞跃、白瑞瑞、李婷、魏云、路孝琴、金光辉

展开 >

首都医科大学附属北京潞河医院全科医学科,北京 101149

北京市朝阳区望京社区卫生服务中心,北京 100102

首都医科大学全科医学与继续教育学院,北京 100069

首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院全科医疗科,北京 100176

展开 >

糖尿病 慢性病管理 基层医疗 家庭医生 卫生服务连续性

2025

中华全科医师杂志
中华医学会

中华全科医师杂志

影响因子:0.699
ISSN:1671-7368
年,卷(期):2025.24(1)