首页|右心畸形先天性心脏病术后左心房容积的心血管磁共振成像评估

右心畸形先天性心脏病术后左心房容积的心血管磁共振成像评估

扫码查看
目的:应用心血管磁共振成像(CMR)评估常见右心畸形先天性心脏病(先心病)术后患者左心房容积的改变,比较不同的容积测量方法并探讨双平面面积长度法(双平面法)的可行性。方法:前瞻性连续收集2022年6月至2022年8月于上海交通大学医学院附属上海儿童医学中心接受CMR检查的右心畸形先心病术后患者33例(先心病组)及健康受试者30例(健康组)。利用Qmass 8.2后处理软件使用短轴法和双平面法获得左心房容积指标,包括左心房最大前容积指数(LAVImax)、左心房最小容积指数(LAVImin)及左心房收缩前容积指数(LAVIpreA),并计算左心房储存期、管道期及收缩期的射血分数(EF),评估两种方法结果的一致性和可重复性,分析左心房容积的影响因素及容积改变。结果:短轴法和双平面法测得的所有容积指标均具有较高相关性(r为0.77~0.96,P<0.001)。其中,双平面法测得的LAVImin略低于短轴法[12.24(10.17,13.78)ml/m2对12.81(10.76,14.17)ml/m2,P=0.002],储存期和管道期EF稍高于短轴法[(58.54±7.41)%对(56.18±7.19)%,P<0.001;(36.85±9.41)%对(34.78±8.51)%,P=0.033],两种方法LAVImax、LAVIpreA及收缩期EF比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);双平面法的测量时间明显短于短轴法[(5.67±0.92)min对(11.70±1.72)min),P<0.001]。与健康组相比,先心病组患者储存期和管道期EF下降[(58.54±7.41)%对(65.46±5.35)%,P<0.001;(36.85±9.41)%对(51.82±12.99)%,P<0.001],收缩期EF升高[(34.39±8.60)%对(28.40±11.42)%,P=0.043],左心房容积指数差异无统计学意义。双平面法测量左心房容积参数的可重复性均较好(组内相关系数0.85~0.99)。结论:双平面法是一种便捷、准确且可重复的方法,可以用于先心病术后左心房容积和EF的评估。与容积指数相比,EF可更早提示左心房功能不全。
Left atrial volume in the postoperative right-sided malformations of congenital heart diseases assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance
Objective:To assess the left atrial volume in patients with postoperative right-sided congenital heart diseases (CHD) with different methods by cardiovasculav magnetic resonance (CMR) and explore the feasibility of biplane area length method.Methods:This study was prospective study. From June 2022 to August 2022, 33 postoperative patients with right-sided CHD who underwent CMR in Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine were selected.Left atrial volume indexes, including maximum (LAVImax), minimum (LAVImin) and pre-atrial contraction volume index (LAVIpreA), were obtained by the biplane area-length method and short axis method using Qmass 8.2 software. Then the volume ejection fractions (EF) including reservoir, conduit and pump EF were calculated. The agreement and reproducibility were evaluated between two methods,and the impact of age and gender on volume were explored.Results:All volume parameters had a high correlation between two methods(r 0.77-0.96, P< 0.001). LAVImin of the biplane area-length method was lower than that of the standard short-axis method [12.24(10.17, 3.78) ml/m2 vs. 12.81(10.76, 14.17) ml/m2, P = 0.002], and reservoir and conduit EF were higher than those of the short-axis method [(58.54±7.41)% vs. (56.18±7.19)%, P < 0.001; (36.85±9.41)% vs. (34.78±8.51)%, P = 0.033]. The remaining parameters were not statistically different. The biplane area-length method was significantly faster than the standard short-axis method [(5.67±0.92)min vs.(11.70±1.72)min, P<0.001]. The intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of left atrial volume parameters by the biplane area-length method was good (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.85-0.99). Compared with the controls, the patients showed lower reservoir and conduit EF [(58.54±7.41)% vs. (65.46±5.35)%, P < 0.001; (36.85±9.41)% vs. (51.82±12.99)%, P < 0.001], but higher pump EF [(34.39±8.60)% vs. (28.40±11.42)%,P=0.043] with no difference in left atrial volume indexes.Conclusion:The biplane area-length method can be used as an alternative way for the short-axis method with accuracy and efficiency. Left atrial EF have altered before left atrial enlargement, acting as early markers of atrial dysfunction.

马岩岩、欧阳荣珍、胡立伟、王谦、孙爱敏、郭辰、钟玉敏

展开 >

200127 上海,上海交通大学医学院附属上海儿童医学中心放射科

磁共振成像 先天性心脏病 双平面法 短轴法 左心房

国家自然科学基金上海市科学技术委员会科技计划国家临床重点专科

8217190221Y11910700沪卫医[2021]99号

2023

中华心脏与心律电子杂志

中华心脏与心律电子杂志

ISSN:
年,卷(期):2023.11(4)
  • 1