首页|医学科研失信行为特征及处理对策研究——基于国家三部委通报的672起医学科研失信行为案件分析

医学科研失信行为特征及处理对策研究——基于国家三部委通报的672起医学科研失信行为案件分析

Research on the characteristics and the handling countermeasures of dishonesty in medical scientific research:Analysis of 672 cases of dishonesty in medical scientific research reported by three ministries and commissions

扫码查看
目的 通过对国家科技部等三部委公布的医学科研失信行为案件开展整体和个案研究,总结案件所涉及科研失信行为及处理措施的特征,并提出相应处理对策,为科研管理人员及相关部门处理各类科研失信行为提供参考.方法 选取2015年1月至2022年5月国家科技部、国家自然科学基金委员会和国家卫生健康委员会三部委公开通报的672起医学科研失信行为案件处理决定为研究对象,建立数据库,对案件的地区、单位类型、所涉及的科研失信行为以及处理措施进行分类统计;选取A医院进行个案研究,分析该院科研失信人员所涉及科研失信行为与处罚年限间的规律与联系.结果 672起案件中,单位类型多集中在医院(536起);山东省通报的科研失信行为案件数量最多(48.96%).科研失信行为中,365起(54.32%)案件存在伪造、篡改研究数据,324起(48.21%)案件存在买卖、代写论文,232起(34.52%)案件存在不当署名、擅自将他人列为论文作者,其他失信行为出现频次较少.处理措施中,7类科研失信行为所对应频次第一位的处理措施均为一定期限直至永久取消申报项目等资格.通过个案研究发现,A医院失信人员处罚年限与合并论文数量基本呈正相关.结论 医学类科研失信行为仍较为严峻,为进一步优化科研失信行为处理流程,未来科研产出单位应当建立健全论文审核与监督体系,公开对科研失信行为的处理,对科研失信行为保持零容忍态度,视情节轻重采取宽严相济的处理策略,并重视科研诚信教育引导;医学期刊应加强对科研失信行为的监督与惩戒力度.
Objective To conduct a comprehensive and case-specific study of the cases of dishonesty in medical scientific research published by the 3 ministries and commissions including the Ministry of Science and Technology,summarize the char-acteristics of scientific research dishonesty and the handling measures involved,and to propose corresponding countermeasures,providing references for research management personnel and relevant departments to address various instances of scientific re-search dishonesty.Methods 672 publicly reported cases of medical scientific research dishonesty handled by the Ministry of Science and Technology,the National Natural Science Foundation,and the National Health Commission from January 2015 to May 2022 were selected as the research object to establish a database.Descriptive statistical analysis was conducted on the re-gions,types of units involved,specific instances of dishonesty,and treatment measures.Additionally,a case study at A hospi-tal was conducted to analyze the patterns and relationships between the dishonesty types and the duration of punishment.Results Among the 672 cases,the types of units involved were mainly concentrated in hospitals,and Shandong Province notified the largest number of cases.The most common types of dishonesty included falsification and alteration of research data,trading or ghostwriting of papers,plagiarism,improper authorship,and unauthorized signatures.Among the treatment measures,the most frequent treatment measures for the seven types of scientific research dishonesty were the disqualification of project appli-cation for a certain period of time or permanently.Conclusions In recent years,the situation of scientific research dishonesty in the medical field is still serious.In order to further optimize the process of handling scientific research misconduct dishonesty,the future research output units should establish a sound audit and supervision system for the papers,make public the treatment of scientific research dishonesty,maintain a zero-tolerance attitude towards scientific research dishonesty,adopt the strategy of leniency and severity depending on the severity of the case,and pay attention to the education and guidance of scientific research integrity;medical journals should strengthen the supervision and disciplinary efforts for scientific research misconduct.

Scientific research dishonestyCase studyHandling measures

宋新涛、马瑾、卢耀勤、刘琦、艾克丹·塔西、赵镇、俞婧

展开 >

省部共建中亚高发病成因与防治国家重点实验室新疆医科大学,乌鲁木齐 830011

新疆医科大学第一附属医院,乌鲁木齐 830054

乌鲁木齐市疾病预防控制中心 830026

南方医科大学,广州 510515

展开 >

科研失信 个案研究 处理对策

省部共建中亚高发病成因与防治国家重点实验室开放基金自治区自然科学基金杰出青年基金

SKL-HIDCA-2021-252023D01E13

2024

中华医学科研管理杂志
中华医学会

中华医学科研管理杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.515
ISSN:1006-1924
年,卷(期):2024.37(2)
  • 16