浙江大学学报(工学版)2024,Vol.58Issue(2) :413-425.DOI:10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2024.02.019

基于改进修正动员强度设计方法的软土基坑围护结构侧移预测

Prediction of lateral displacement of retaining structure of soft soil foundation pit based on improved modified mobilizable strength design method

肖衎 张世民 丁智 范晓真 张霄
浙江大学学报(工学版)2024,Vol.58Issue(2) :413-425.DOI:10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2024.02.019

基于改进修正动员强度设计方法的软土基坑围护结构侧移预测

Prediction of lateral displacement of retaining structure of soft soil foundation pit based on improved modified mobilizable strength design method

肖衎 1张世民 2丁智 3范晓真 3张霄1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 浙江大学建筑工程学院,浙江杭州 310058
  • 2. 浙江大学建筑工程学院,浙江杭州 310058;浙大城市学院土木工程系,浙江杭州 310015
  • 3. 浙大城市学院土木工程系,浙江杭州 310015;浙江省城市盾构隧道安全建造与智能养护重点实验室,浙江杭州 310015
  • 折叠

摘要

为了进一步优化软土地区基坑设计方法,提升基坑支护体系的安全性与经济性,在已有研究的基础上,根据工程实践经验,修正了 MSD法和其改进方法(MMSD法).基于圆弧滑动模式提出更符合实际的塑性变形机制,引入基坑开挖主要影响深度来量化位移场尺寸.理论计算方法适用于分析软黏土地区多支点式柔性支护结构的基坑开挖全过程的变形预测.将该方法的计算结果与6个上海地区的基坑工程实测数据、弹性支点法的计算结果及MMSD法的计算结果进行对比分析.对不同开挖阶段的围护结构最大侧移和最大侧移深度进行参数分析.结果表明,利用该方法得到的预测值与实测值吻合效果更佳,预测精度高于弹性支点法和MMSD法,证明了该方法的实用性.

Abstract

The MSD method and its improved method(MMSD method)were modified based on the existing research and the engineering practice experience in order to further optimize the design method of foundation pit in soft soil area and improve the safety and economy of foundation pit support system.A more realistic plastic deformation mechanism was proposed based on the circular sliding mode,and the main influence depth of foundation pit excavation was introduced to quantify the size of displacement field.The method is suitable for analyzing the deformation prediction of the whole process of foundation pit excavation of multi-fulcrum flexible supporting structure in soft clay area.The calculation results of the method were compared with the measured data of six foundation pit projects in Shanghai,the calculation results of elastic fulcrum method and the calculation results of MMSD method.The parameter analysis of the maximum lateral displacement and the maximum lateral displacement depth of the retaining structure in different excavation stages was conducted.Results showed that the predicted value of the method accorded with the measured value,and the prediction accuracy was higher than that of the elastic fulcrum method and MMSD method.The practicability of this method was proved.

关键词

能量法/增量法/墙体侧移/软黏土/多支撑开挖

Key words

energy method/incremental method/wall deflection/soft clay/multi-support excavation

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

浙江省"尖兵领雁"研发攻关计划(2023C03182)

国家自然科学基金(52178400)

国家自然科学基金(52278418)

浙江省自然科学基金(LHZ20E080001)

浙江省自然科学基金(LQ23E080002)

浙江省重点研发计划(2020C01102)

出版年

2024
浙江大学学报(工学版)
浙江大学

浙江大学学报(工学版)

CSTPCDCSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.625
ISSN:1008-973X
参考文献量33
段落导航相关论文