首页|"北京古学院"与民国老辈的国学研究

"北京古学院"与民国老辈的国学研究

扫码查看
既有近代学术史叙述以新文化派与整理国故运动为主流,然而新文化派在近代国学研究群体中并非一枝独秀,老辈学人在相当长的时期内在民国学界占据重要甚至主导地位.学界普遍认为20世纪30年代分科之学成为主流后,国学问题已经不再重要.北平沦陷后,遗老宿儒组建"北京古学院",阐扬国学.古学院以"救济贫儒"和"提倡旧学"为宗旨,经历了有关分科分组研究、编修《清代资治通鉴》与否的纷争,后改组为国学书院.由于古学院内部老辈学人政治身份的尴尬和各自学术立场的分歧,该群体在国学研究的实践中注定处于两难境地.系统考察古学院的运作和学术旨趣,既能探究古学院老辈学人的学术实践与生存困境,更有助于展现20世纪30-40年代国学研究的复杂面向,揭示近代学术流变的多元路径,为思考传统学术转型提供参考.
The"Beijing Ancient Academy"and Chinese Classics Studies by the Old Scholars in the Republic of China
The existing narrative of modern academic history was nearly dominated by the School of New Culture and the Movement for Rearranging the National Heritage.However,the School of New Culture was not the only one in the group of modern Chinese classics studies,and the old generation of scholars had been occupying an important position in the academic field of the Republic of China for quite a long time.On July 29,1937,when Beiping was occupied by the Japanese invaders,Jiang Chaozong,Li Jingming,Qian Tong gathered up some old scholars of the former Qing dynasty and frustrated politicians living in Beiping to establish the"Beijing Ancient Academy".After many setbacks,Beijing Ancient Academy was formally established on November 1,1938,Jiang Chaozong served as president of the academy,Zhang Yanqing as vice president,and Wu Tingxie,Yang Zhongxi,Qu Xuanying,Zhou Zhaoxiang,Huang Binhong and others as the members of the council.Beijing Ancient Academy declared that with the purpose of"preserving the traditional culture",the Group of Confucian Classics,the Group of History,the Group of Various Schools of Thought in pre-Qin,the Group of Literature,the Group of Inscriptions on Ancient Bronzes and Stone Tablets,the Group of Catalogue Collation,and the Group of Art were set up to conduct academic research.At the same time,Beijing Ancient Academy compiled the Journal of Classical Learning,organized examinations,and set up lecture places.Based on the overall landscape of modern Chinese classics studies,this paper fully incorporates the research findings of the old generation of scholars in the Republic of China.Taking the newly published Li Jingming Archives in the Collection of the Institute of Modern History as a clue,and combining relevant collected works,newspapers,archives,memories,biographies and other documents,this paper focuses on the origin of the establishment of Beijing Ancient Academy,the discussion on grouping and discipline division,the disputes on the compilation of the Zizhi Tongjian of the Qing Dynasty and the eventual reorganization into the Academy of Chinese Classics Studies.Therefore,it can be seen that due to the embarrassing political identities of the old scholars and the divergences of their respective academic positions,the group was destined to be in a dilemma in the practice of their studies on Chinese classics,and there were many constraints causing the difficulty in implementing their academic concepts in the mid-and late-Republic of China.Beijing Ancient Academy and Academy of Chinese Classics Studies advocated the rescue and revitalization of Chinese classics studies,which seemingly presented a false picture of peace and prosperity in the Japanese-occupied areas.Through a systematic and in-depth study of the operation and academic tastes of Beijing Ancient Academy,this paper explores the academic practices and survival efforts of the old generation of scholars in Beijing Ancient Academy and contributes to demonstrating the complexities of Chinese classics studies in the 1930s and 1940s,revealing the diversified paths of modern academic evolutions,and providing insights for the exploration of the effective ways of traditional academic transformation.

the Beijing Ancient Academyold scholarsChinese classics studiesLi Jingming

马运娟、张凯

展开 >

浙江大学历史学院,浙江杭州 310058

北京古学院 老辈 国学研究 李景铭

国家社科基金项目

19BZS082

2024

浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)
浙江大学

浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.431
ISSN:1008-942X
年,卷(期):2024.54(7)
  • 4