浙江大学学报(医学版)2015,Issue(2) :138-144.DOI:10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2015.03.004

眩晕症状量表的汉化及信效度和反应度检验

Development of Chinese evrsion vertigo symptom scale (VSS):reliabili ty and validity

邓真 元唯安 王辉昊 詹红生
浙江大学学报(医学版)2015,Issue(2) :138-144.DOI:10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2015.03.004

眩晕症状量表的汉化及信效度和反应度检验

Development of Chinese evrsion vertigo symptom scale (VSS):reliabili ty and validity

邓真 1元唯安 1王辉昊 1詹红生1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 上海中医药大学附属曙光医院石氏伤科医学中心,上海201203; 上海中医药研究院骨伤科研究所,上海201203
  • 折叠

摘要

目的:汉化眩晕症状量表( Vertigo Syndrome Scale 中文版, VSS-C 量表),并通过评估以眩晕为主要症状的椎动脉型颈椎病患者对VSS-C量表进行信效度、反应度检验。方法:征得原量表作者同意后,按照相关指南及要求,将原量表汉化为VSS-C量表。将VSS-C量表应用于健康对照组(21名)和椎动脉型颈椎病患者(52例),对照组在2周内独立完成VSS-C量表评定2次;患者组在3周内独立完成VSS-C评定3次(在第3次评定前接受为期1周的手法康复治疗),同时与SF-36健康调查量表评定结果对照。通过两次VSS-C量表的评定结果相关性分析来测试其重测信度,以科隆巴赫α系数来评定VSS-C 量表的内部一致性。将VSS-C量表的结果与 SF-36健康调查量表的各个维度进行相关性分析来评定VSS-C量表的效度。比较患者组第2次和第3次的VSS-C量表结果评定其对于手法康复治疗的反应度。结果:VSS-C 量表两次测验组内相关系数均大于0.9( P<0.05),两个子量表的科隆巴赫α系数均在0.7以上,总体VSS-C 量表的科隆巴赫α系数大于0.85。 VSS-C 量表各个项目与所属子量表之间相关系数值均大于0.5;VSS-C量表与SF3-6健康调查量表中相应的亚项目之间相关系数值均大于0.5;VSS-C量表经限定抽取公共因素法行因子分析,所抽取的2个公因子在各条目中所占比重与原版VSS量表中所属子量表大致相符。患者组和对照组VSS-C量表评分分别为22.9±9.2和10.6±10.2,两者之间差异有统计学意义( P <0.01);患者组手法治疗前后VSS-C量表评分分别为24.4±10.0和23.0±9.3,差异也有统计学意义( P<0.01)。结论:VSS-C量表在评价椎动脉型颈椎病患者眩晕程度上具有较好的信度、效度及可重复性。

Abstract

Objective: To develop a Chinese version of Vertigo Symptom Scale ( VSS-C) and to examine its reliability and validity .Methods:The VSS was translated into Chinese and developed a Chinese version VSS ( VSS-C ) with the consent of the author .The VSS-C scale was tested in 52 subjects with cervical spondylosis of vertebral artery type ( CSA group ) and 21healthy subjects ( control group ) .In CSA group VSS-C scale and SF-36 scale investigation was performed for 2 times with 1 week interval , after receiving 1-week orthopedic rehabilitation the patients were evaluated with the VSS -C and SF-36 scale;while subjects in control group received the investigation twice in two weeks.The reliability of the scale was evaluated with Cronbach's alpha method and the correlation between SF-36 scale and the VSS-C were also evaluated for the validity . Results:The internal consistency of VSS-C was good with Cronbach's alpha of 0.886 . Test-retest reliability was also very good with an intraclass correlation coefficient ( ICC) between two time points , being 0.970 for VSS-C,0.965 for VSS-AA and 0.992 for the VSS-VER.Regarding concurrent validity ,significant low correlation was found between the VSS-AA and VSS-VER ( r=0.379 ,P<0.05 ) .Significant expected correlation was detected between the VSS-C and SF-36 ( r>0.5 ,P<0.05 ) .The independent-samples t test results ( t=6.261 ,P<0.01 ) of the CSA group and the control group showed that the VSS-C was able to distinguish healthy people from CSA patients . The paired-samples t test results ( t =5.513 , P <0.01 ) showed that VSS-C reflected the improvement of patients after treatment of Chinese massage manipulation .Conclusion:The Chinese version of VSS has a high comprehensibility , internal consistency and validity, and it can be a useful instrument for evaluation of patients with cervical spondylosis of vertebral artery type in China .

关键词

眩晕/椎底动脉供血不足/评价研究

Key words

Vertigo/Vertebrobasilar insufficiency/Evaluation studies

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

“中医骨伤科学”国家重点学科(100508)

国家自然科学基金(81473702)

国家自然科学基金(81001528)

上海领军人才项目(041)

上海市科委重点项目(14401970402)

上海市科委重点项目(09dZ1973800)

上海高校“中医脊柱病损研究”创新团队建设项目(2009-26)

出版年

2015
浙江大学学报(医学版)
浙江大学

浙江大学学报(医学版)

CSTPCDCSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.926
ISSN:1008-9292
被引量23
参考文献量4
段落导航相关论文