首页|行政协议反向诉讼制度构建的必要性与可行性研究

行政协议反向诉讼制度构建的必要性与可行性研究

扫码查看
行政协议被 2015 年施行的《中华人民共和国行政诉讼法》首次纳入行政诉讼范围.实践中,行政主体虽能运用单方变更、解除协议、非诉强制执行、民事诉讼的方式寻求救济,但是在追求诉权平等、区分行政协议与行政行为等问题上仍具有构建反向诉讼制度的必要性.该制度的构建从立法目的和域外实践来看,无论是在诉讼程序的启动上还是在举证责任的完善上均具有一定的可行性.
A study on the necessity and feasibility of constructing a reverse litigation system for administrative agreements
Administrative agreements were included in the scope of administrative litigation for the first time when the Administrative Litigation Law of the People's Republic of China was implemented in 2015.In practice,although administrative entities can seek relief through unilateral changes,termination of agreements,non-litigation enforcement,and civil litigation,it is still necessary to build a reverse litigation system in pursuing equality of litigation rights,distinguishing administrative agreements from administrative actions,and other issues.The construction of this system is feasible in terms of the legislative purpose of administrative litigation and extraterritorial practice,both in the initiation of litigation procedures and the improvement of the burden of proof.

administrative agreementsreverse litigationequality of litigation rightsburden of proof

黄鹏、孙韡

展开 >

贵州民族大学 法学院,贵州 贵阳 550025

行政协议 反向诉讼 诉权平等 举证责任

2024

镇江高专学报
镇江市高等专科学校

镇江高专学报

影响因子:0.269
ISSN:1008-8148
年,卷(期):2024.37(3)