Academic evaluation plays an important guiding role in academic activities.Representative work evaluation guided by scientific research quality and academic level is gradually accepted and applied in practice.There is little difference between the results of the evaluation of scientific papers using quantita-tive bibliometric indicators and the results of peer review,and the representative works can be screened un-der certain conditions.The bibliometric index h can reflect both the number of papers with the highest cita-tion frequency and the number of citations.Scholars'academic level can be evaluated according to the cita-tion frequency of the most citated paper and the publication time range of the paper on the basis of the h in-dex,and the determination of the representative works of scholars according to the activity and scale of dif-ferent discipline can reflect the author's academic level as objectively as possible.
关键词
代表作制度/文献计量学指标/学术评价/h指数/类h指数
Key words
Representative work system/Bibliometric indicator/academic evaluation/H-index/H-type index
维普
万方数据