首页|论行政复议机关调查取证的限度

论行政复议机关调查取证的限度

扫码查看
新《行政复议法》第45条规定复议机关有权调查取证,但是未明确可以调查收集哪些证据.依据《行诉法解释》第22条第1款和第135条第3款,复议机关可以为原行政行为补充调查取证,并据此作出维持复议决定.复议机关补充调查取证的实质是,把原来不符合法律规定的行政行为修复为符合法律规定,面临一系列难以化解的合法性质疑."行政一体化"理论和行政争议实质性化解理论主张复议机关全面调查取证,但前者颠覆了行政复议的性质,错误地把行政复议作为后续行政程序,后者仅以"未再启动新的法律程序"目的为基点,忽视行政复议的监督与救济功能.在监督行政与救济权利的视野下,即使为实质性化解行政争议,复议机关调查取证的范围也应当限于程序性事项、核实当事人证据三性、证明原行政行为违法或申请人实体诉求成立以及涉及公共利益的事项.
On the Limits of Investigation and Evidence Collection by Administrative Reconsideration Organs
Article 45 of the new"Administrative Reconsideration Law"stipulates that the reconsid-eration organ has the right to investigate and collect evidence,but it does not clarify what kind of evi-dence can be investigated and collected.According to Article 22,Paragraph 1,and Article 135,para-graph 3,of"Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Application of the Administrative Litiga-tion Law",the reconsideration authority may conduct supplementary investigation,collect principal ev-idence for the original administrative action and sustain the action accordingly.The essence of the recon-sideration organ's supplementary investigation and evidence collection power is to legalize the other-wise illegal original administrative action which may raise serious doubt.The principle of"administra-tion in accordance with law"demands that the reconsideration authority cannot interfere with the evi-dence collection activity with the aim of modifying the legality of the original administrative action.The"administrative integration"theory and the"substantive resolution of administrative disputes theory"ad-vocate that the reconsideration organ could comprehensively investigates and collects evidence.Howev-er,the former subverts the nature of administrative reconsideration and erroneously treats administrative reconsideration as follow-up administrative procedures,while the latter only focuses on"no new legal procedures have been initiated"but ignore the supervision and relief functions of administrative recon-sideration,thus both are not persuasive.From the perspective of the supervision and relief function of administrative reconsideration,even if it is to substantively resolve administrative disputes,the scope of investigation and evidence collection by the reconsideration organ should be limited to resolving pro-cedural issues,verification of the evidence provided by parties,proving that the original administrative action is illegal or supporting substantive claims of applicants,and matters involving public interest.

administrative reconsiderationreview organinvestigation and evidence collectionlimits

张旭勇

展开 >

浙江财经大学(杭州 310018)

行政复议 复议机关 调查取证 限度

2024

浙江社会科学
浙江省社会科学界联合会

浙江社会科学

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.677
ISSN:1004-2253
年,卷(期):2024.(2)
  • 32