首页|爬取公开信息行为入罪的逻辑解构与标准重构——从"反反爬行为"的性质切入

爬取公开信息行为入罪的逻辑解构与标准重构——从"反反爬行为"的性质切入

扫码查看
在涉及网络爬虫程序的数据犯罪案件中,绕过反爬虫措施的"反反爬行为"因其"技术侵入性"和"法益侵害性",成为爬取公开信息行为入罪的主要依据.然而,反爬虫措施不是计算机安保措施,故"反反爬行为"的"侵入性"在技术层面上并不成立.同时,为保护"数据控制权"而认定绕过反爬虫措施抓取数据行为侵害数据安全的观点,亦不具有正当性、合理性和可行性.实际上,基于计算机技术的原理、数字经济发展的需求、维护法秩序统一的需要,只有当"反反爬行为"突破基于特定身份的访问权限,从而破坏封闭网络空间的信息安全时,相应爬取数据行为和提供爬虫程序行为才成立数据犯罪.因而绕过反爬虫措施抓取公开信息的行为,不应构成非法获取计算机信息系统数据罪.
Logical Deconstruction and Standard Reconstruction for the Criminalization of Scraping Public Information:Starting from the Nature of"Anti Anti-Scraping"
In cases of data crimes involving web crawlers,the"Anti Anti-Scraping"which bypass-es anti-scraping techniques has become the main basis for the crime of scraping browsable information.However,anti-scraping techniques are not computer security protection measures,so the"intrusive-ness"of"Anti Anti-Scraping"does not hold up at the technical level.Moreover,it is not justifiable,reasonable and feasible to determine that"Anti Anti-Scraping"violates data security from the standpoint of protecting"data control rights".In fact,based on the principles of computer technology,the needs of the development of the digital economy,and the need to maintain the unity of legal order,only when the"Anti Anti-Scraping"breaks through the identity access authority and destroys the information secu-rity of the closed network space,the corresponding behavior of scraping data and providing web crawl-er should be considered data crimes.Therefore,the act of bypassing anti-crawler measures to scrap pub-lic information should not constitute a crime of illegally obtaining computer information system data.

anti anti-scrapingweb crawlerpublic informationcrime of illegally obtaining com-puter data

苏桑妮

展开 >

浙江工业大学数字法治研究院

浙江工业大学法学院(杭州310023)

反反爬行为 网络爬虫 公开信息 非法获取计算机信息系统数据罪

国家社会科学基金

22CFX064

2024

浙江社会科学
浙江省社会科学界联合会

浙江社会科学

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.677
ISSN:1004-2253
年,卷(期):2024.(4)
  • 47