首页|论荒谬之为异化——重思内格尔生命意义论证

论荒谬之为异化——重思内格尔生命意义论证

扫码查看
托马斯·内格尔反驳了关于生命意义三个常见论证,即"百万年论证"、"蚍蜉论证"和"死亡终结论证",进而指出生命的荒谬感实际上反映了人的一种深层次的自我认知能力,是我们对生活的深刻投入与对其"无可回避的疑虑"之间的冲突产生的.根据马克思的历史观框架,提出了对荒谬的一种历史解释,荒谬感其实是随现代化进程逐渐显现的认知状态,是一种社会历史现象,是异化的一种形态,其与人的社会存在方式密切相关,进而指出,随着历史的发展和进步,当人类处于"分化的统一"阶段,作为主观异化的荒谬,这一种社会历史现象,最终也将随历史而去.
On the Alienation of Absurdity
Thomas Nagel refuted three common arguments about the meaning of life,namely the"Million Year Argument","Mayflies Argument",and"End of Death Argument",and further pointed out that the absurdity of life actually reflects a deep level of self-awareness in humans,which arises from the conflict between our profound investment in life and our unavoidable doubts about it.Accord-ing to the framework of Marx's historical view,a historical interpretation of absurdity is proposed.The sense of absurdity is actually a cognitive state that gradually emerges with the process of modernization,a social historical phenomenon,and a form of alienation.It is closely related to the way people exist in society.Furthermore,it is pointed out that with the development and progress of history,when humani-ty is in the stage of"differentiation and unity",as a subjective alienation of absurdity,this social histor-ical phenomenon will eventually disappear with history.

absurdalienationthe meaning of life

吴小安、洪程锋

展开 >

西北工业大学马克思主义学院(西安 710072)

西北工业大学陕西省舆情信息研究中心

荒谬 异化 生命的意义

教育部人文社会科学研究项目国家社会科学基金重大项目西北工业大学研究生创新基金(2024)

21XJC72000217ZDA024PF2024018

2024

浙江社会科学
浙江省社会科学界联合会

浙江社会科学

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.677
ISSN:1004-2253
年,卷(期):2024.(5)
  • 17