首页|历史哲学的生成——重解卢卡奇的费希特批评

历史哲学的生成——重解卢卡奇的费希特批评

扫码查看
卢卡奇在《历史与阶级意识》中将费希特的先验哲学视为近代主体性哲学的代表,并重点批评了后者实际上导致了世界的"非理性化".从费希特本人的视角来看,主体与客体之间的裂隙已经通过先验知识的再生-生产二重化机制得到克服,因而卢卡奇的这一批评并不成立.卢卡奇的费希特批评实际上受到了同时代新康德主义思想家拉斯克与路德宗神学家希尔施的强烈影响,拉斯克与希尔施都指出世界的"非理性化"问题的实质在于个体性问题,而解决个体性问题的关键在于建构一种全新的历史哲学.从这一角度看,卢卡奇的费希特批评中所错失的维度也许蕴含着一种全新历史哲学的可能性.
The Genesis of the Philosophy of History Lukács's Critique of Fichte Revisited
In his 1923 work History and Class Consciousness,Georg Lukács regards Fichte's tran-scendental philosophy as representative of modem philosophy of subjectivity,and critiques it for ulti-mately leading to the irrationalization of the world.From Fichte's perspective,the gap between subject and object has already been overcome through the mechanism of the duplication of transcendental knowledge-production,thus invalidating Lukács's criticism.Lukács's critique of Fichte is actually strongly influenced by contemporary neo-Kantian thinker Emil Lask and Lutheran theologian Emanuel Hirsch,both of whom point out that the essence of the irrationalization of the world lies in the issue of individuality,and the key to addressing the issue of individuality lies in constructing a new philosophy of history.From this perspective,the dimensions missed in Lukács's critique of Fichte may perhaps contain the possibility of a new philosophy of history.

LukácsLaskHirschFichteproductionindividualhistory

倪逸偲

展开 >

浙江大学哲学学院暨外国哲学研究所(杭州 310058)

卢卡奇 拉斯克 希尔施 费希特 生产 个体 历史

国家社会科学基金项目

22CZX056

2024

浙江社会科学
浙江省社会科学界联合会

浙江社会科学

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.677
ISSN:1004-2253
年,卷(期):2024.(7)