首页|化疗联合大分割放疗或超分割放疗治疗局限期小细胞肺癌的疗效对比研究

化疗联合大分割放疗或超分割放疗治疗局限期小细胞肺癌的疗效对比研究

扫码查看
目的 比较研究化疗联合大分割放疗或超分割放疗治疗局限期小细胞肺癌的疗效。方法 选择2018年1月~2023年2月浙江新安国际医院收治的局限期小细胞肺癌患者80例,采用随机分组法分为超分割组和大分割组,每组40例。两组化疗方案相同,均采用顺铂+依托泊苷方案化疗,静脉滴注依托泊苷(5mL:0。1g),剂量100mg/m2,d1_3;静脉注射顺铂,剂量75mg/m2,d1。化疗周期21天,共6个周期。在化疗的第2个周期开始联合放疗。超分割组给予超分割放疗,总剂量45Gy,1。5Gy/次,2次/d,两次放疗至少间隔6小时,每周放疗5天;大分割组给予大分割放疗,总剂量55Gy,2。5Gy/次,1次/d,每周放疗5天。观察两组临床疗效(近期疗效和无疾病进展生存率(PFS)、肿瘤指标[癌胚抗原(CEA)、血管内皮细胞生长因子受体(VEGFR)、内皮抑素(ES)、循环内皮细胞(CEC)]和T淋巴细胞亚群(CD3+、CD4+、CD8+)、生活质量(KPS评分)、≥3级的不良事件。结果 (1)近期疗效。大分割组与超分割组缓解率(92。50%&85。00%)比较差异无统计学意义(x2=1。127,P=0。288);无疾病进展生存期大分割组[(20。80±2。12)个月]高于超分割组[(15。00±1。87)个月],两组比较差异有统计学意义(x2=4。068,P=0。044)。(2)肿瘤指标。治疗后两组CEA、VEGFR1、VEGFR2、CEC均较治疗前降低,ES较治疗前升高(均P<0。05);两组之间比较各指标差异无统计学意义(P>0。05)。(3)T淋巴细胞亚群。治疗后,CD3+、CD4+、CD4+/CD8+均较治疗前升高,大分割组较超分割组更高,CD8+较治疗前降低,大分割组较超分割组更低(均P<0。05)。(4)生活质量。大分割组生活质量优于超分割组(Z=2。006,P=0。045)。(5)不良事件。两组≥3级的放射性食管炎、放射性肺炎、放射性气管炎、骨髓抑制、肝功能损伤发生率比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0。05)。结论 局限期小细胞肺癌采用大分割放疗联合化疗的疗效和安全性与超分割放疗联合化疗相似,但大分割放疗联合化疗可改善机体免疫功能,提高生活质量,提高无疾病进展生存期。
A comparative study on the therapeutic effect of chemotherapy combined with large seg-ment radiotherapy or hypersegment radiotherapy in the treatment of limited stage small cell lung cancer
Objective The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of chemotherapy combined with high-di-mensional radiotherapy or high-dimensional radiotherapy in the treatment of limited stage small cell lung cancer.Method Eighty patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer admitted to Zhejiang Xin'an International Hospital from January 2018 to February 2023 were randomly divided into a hypersegmentation group and a large segmentation group,with 40 cases in each group.The two chemotherapy regimens were the same,both using the cisplatin+etoposide regimen,intravenous infu-sion of etoposide(5mL:0.1g)at a dose of 100mg/m2,d1-3;intravenous injection of cisplatin at a dose of 75mg/m2,d1.The chemotherapy cycle was 21 days,with a total of 6 cycles.Starting from the second cycle of chemotherapy,combined with ra-diotherapy.The hyperfractionation group received hyperfractionation radiotherapy with a total dose of 45 Gy,each dose of 1.5 Gy,twice a day,with a minimum interval of 6 hours between the two radiotherapy sessions,and 5 days of radiotherapy per week;The large segmentation group was given large segmentation radiotherapy,with a total dose of 55 Gy,each dose of 2.5 Gy,once a day,and 5 days of radiotherapy per week.Observe two groups of clinical efficacy(recent efficacy and progression free survival(PFS),tumor indicators(carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA),vascular endothelial growth factor receptor(VEGFR),endostatin(ES),circulating endothelial cells(CEC),T lymphocyte subsets(CD3+,CD4+,CD8+),quality of life(using KPS score),and≥grade 3 adverse events.Results(1)Recent therapeutic effects.There was no statistically significant difference in ORR rates between the large segmentation group and the hypersegmentation group(92.50%&85.00%)(x2=1.127,P=0.288);the disease progression free survival in the large segmentation group[(20.80±2.12)months]was higher than that in the hy-persegmentation group[(15.00±1.87)months],and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant(x2=4.068,P=0.044).(2)Tumor indicators.After treatment,CEA、VEGFR1、VEGFR2 and CEC in both groups decreased com-pared to before treatment,while ES increased compared to before treatment(all P<0.05);There was no statistically signifi-cant difference in various indicators between the two groups(P>0.05).(3)T lymphocyte subpopulations.After treatment,CD3+、CD4+and CD4+/CD8+all increased compared to before treatment.The large segmentation group had higher levels than the ultra segmentation group,while CD8+decreased compared to before treatment.The large segmentation group had lower levels than the ultra segmentation group(all P<0.05).(4)Quality of life.The quality of life in the large segmentation group was better than that in the super segmentation group(Z=2.006,P=0.045).(5)Adverse events.There was no statistically sig-nificant difference in the incidence of radiation-induced esophagitis,radiation-induced pneumonia,radiation-induced tra-cheitis,bone marrow suppression,and liver function damage between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion The efficacy and safety of using large fractionated radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy for limited stage small cell lung cancer are simi-lar to those of using hyperfractionated radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy.However,large fractionated radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy can improve immune function,improve quality of life,and increase disease-free survival.

limited stage small cell lung cancerchemotherapylarge segmentation radiotherapyhyperfractionated radiotherapyimmune functionquality of life

贾亮亮、王锋、蔡嘉蕙

展开 >

浙江新安国际医院,浙江嘉兴 314000

局限期小细胞肺癌 化疗 大分割放疗 超分割放疗 免疫功能 生活质量

2024

浙江实用医学
浙江省医学情报研究所

浙江实用医学

影响因子:0.606
ISSN:1007-3299
年,卷(期):2024.29(1)