摘要
从"体育权"英译"sports rights"可以看出我国体育学界设计的体育权概念存在权利范围过于庞大的问题.各国宪法体育权条款的英文表达式大致呈现出四种类型,其中三种有国际法渊源,体现出体育接近权、体育实践权和完整意义上的体育权三种权利理念.以此为基础,根据人们对"体育权"需要的大致流程以及每步流程在权利主体、权利性质、权利关注点及其价值取向上的各自不同,我们可以尝试构建以"体育实践权"为理念核心的中国体育权规范体系.
Abstract
From the English translation of"sports rights",it can be seen that the concept of right to TIYU designed by China's sports academic circles has the problem that the scope of rights is too large.The English expression of the ar-ticles on the right to TIYU in the constitutions of various countries generally presents four types,three of which have sources of international law,reflecting the three rights concepts of the right of access to TIYU,the right to practice TIYU and the right to TIYU in the full sense.On this basis,according to the general process of people's need for"right to TIYU",as well as the differences in the subject of rights,the nature of rights,the concerns of rights and their value orientations in each step,we try to reconstruct the Chinese right normative system with"right to practice TIYU"as the core of the concept.
NETL
NSTL
万方数据