首页|多参数磁共振成像鉴别低高危前列腺癌的应用价值

多参数磁共振成像鉴别低高危前列腺癌的应用价值

扫码查看
目的 探讨体素内不相干运动扩散加权成像(IVIM-DWI)和扩散峰度成像(DKI)参数在不同Gleason评分前列腺癌(PCa)间的差异,并评估其鉴别低高危PCa的应用价值.方法 回顾2018年1至12月浙江中医药大学附属第一医院经病理检查证实为PCa的49例患者资料,其中低危PCa患者(Gleason评分≤3+4)13例,高危PCa患者(Gleason评分≥4+3)36例.所有患者均行常规前列腺MRI、IVIM-DWI和DKI序列扫描.勾画PCa感兴趣区(PCa-ROI)并测量其表观扩散系数(ADC值)、IVIM主要参数[真性扩散系数(D值)、伪扩散系数(D*值)、灌注分数(f值)]和DKI主要参数[平均扩散系数(MD值)、平均峰度(MK值)].比较低危组与高危组间各参数的差异,并绘制ROC曲线分析各参数鉴别低高危PCa的效能.结果 低危组的ADC值、D值、D*值、f 值、MD值和 MK值分别为 0.654±0.125、0.355±0.142、18.700(4.290,48.300)、0.421±0.143、1.914±0.506、0.791±0.206;高危组的 ADC 值、D 值、D*值、f 值、MD值和 MK值分别为 0.550±0.118、0.382±0.115、11.600(5.363,29.950)、0.332±0.137、1.496±0.502、0.946±0.196.其中ADC值、MD值和MK值比较差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05),而D值、D*值、f值比较差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05).ADC值、MD值和MK值鉴别低高危PCa时,AUC分别为0.732、0.739和0.750,灵敏度分别为0.692、0.769和0.639,特异度分别为0.750、0.728和0.846.结论 传统ADC值对鉴别低高危PCa已具有一定应用价值,而部分DKI参数具有相同效果,且可能会在其他方面为其提供补充.
Multiparameter magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating low-risk and high-risk prostate cancer
Objective To investigate the differences of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion weighted imaging(IVIM-DWI)parameters and diffusion kurtosis imaging(DKI)parameters in differentiating low-risk and high-risk prostate cancer(PCa).Methods The clinical and imaging data of 49 patients with PCa confirmed by pathology admitted in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University from January to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed,including 13 patients with low-risk PCa(Gleason score≤3+4)and 36 patients with high-risk PCa(Gleason score≥4+3).All patients underwent routine prostate MRI,IVIM-DWI and DKI sequence scanning.The prostate cancer region of interest(PCa-ROI)was delineated and its apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC value)was measured.The IVIM main parameters included molecular diffusion coefficient(D),perfusion-related diffusion coefficient(D*),perfusion fraction(f);the DKI main parameters included mean diffusivity(MD)and mean kurtosis(MK).Independent sample test was used to compare the differences of various parameters between low-risk group and high-risk group.The receiver operating characteristic curve(ROC)was used to analyze the efficiency of various parameters in differentiating low-risk and high-risk PCa.Results The ADC,D,D*,f,MD and MK value of low-risk group were 0.654±0.125,0.355±0.142,18.700(4.290,48.300),0.421±0.143,1.914±0.506 and 0.791±0.206 respectively;while those of high-risk group were 0.550±0.118,0.382±0.115,11.600(5.363,29.950),0.332±0.137,1.496±0.502 and 0.946±0.196 respectively.There were significant differences in ADC,MD and MK values between high-and low-risk groups(all P<0.05),while there were no significant differences in D,D*and f between two groups(all P>0.05).When ADC,MD and MK value were used to differentiate low-risk and high-risk PCa,the AUC were 0.732,0.739 and 0.750 respectively,the diagnostic sensitivity was 0.692,0.769 and 0.639;and the diagnostic specificity was 0.750,0.728 and 0.846 respectively.Conclusion The conventional ADC value has certain application value in differentiating low-risk and high-risk PCa,while some DKI parameters also have the same effect,which may provide supplement measurements.

Diffusion kurtosis imagingIntravoxel incoherent motion diffusion weighted imagingProstate cancer

胡伟红、沈夏枫、王世威、沈建良、刘姗

展开 >

310006 杭州,浙江中医药大学附属第一医院(浙江省中医院)医学影像科

310006 杭州,浙江中医药大学附属第一医院(浙江省中医院)科研部

扩散峰度成像 体素内不相干运动扩散加权成像 前列腺癌

浙江省中医药科学研究基金

2022ZB143

2024

浙江医学
浙江省医学会

浙江医学

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.428
ISSN:1006-2785
年,卷(期):2024.46(5)
  • 12