首页|阴道试产失败中转剖宫产的风险预测模型构建和母婴结局分析

阴道试产失败中转剖宫产的风险预测模型构建和母婴结局分析

扫码查看
目的 构建阴道试产失败中转剖宫产的风险预测模型并分析相关母婴结局.方法 回顾性选取2023年1月至2024年3月嘉兴市妇幼保健院产科收治的272例孕妇为研究对象,其中172例阴道试产失败中转剖宫产的孕妇设为观察组,100例阴道试产成功分娩的孕妇设为对照组.对两组孕妇妊娠资料进行单因素分析,将单因素分析中P<0.05的因素纳入多因素logistic回归分析,筛选出阴道试产失败中转剖宫产的独立影响因素,按照独立影响因素的β值构建风险预测模型.采用ROC曲线评估风险预测模型预测阴道试产失败中转剖宫产的效能.比较两组母婴结局.结果 观察组孕妇产时BMI、宫高、胎儿双顶径、引产比例均高于对照组,宫颈Bishop评分、经产妇比例均低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05).多因素logistic回归分析显示产时BMI高是阴道试产失败中转剖宫产的独立危险因素(P<0.05),宫颈Bishop评分高、经产妇是阴道试产失败中转剖宫产的独立保护因素(均P<0.05).根据各影响因素的β值建立风险预测模型,风险预测模型=0.259×产时BMI-0.353×宫颈Bishop评分-2.180×经产妇.ROC曲线分析显示,风险预测模型预测阴道试产失败中转剖宫产的AUC为0.862,高于产时BMI(AUC=0.756)、宫颈Bishop评分(AUC=0.729)和经产妇(AUC=0.655),差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.01).观察组新生儿体重、产时出血量、新生儿窒息率均高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05).结论 产时BMI、宫颈Bishop评分、经产妇三者联合的风险预测模型对阴道试产失败中转剖宫产有较好的预测价值;中转剖宫产增加了新生儿窒息和产时出血的风险.
Construction of a risk prediction model for cesarean section after failed vaginal trial of labor and analysis of maternal and infant outcomes
Objective To construct a risk prediction model for cesarean section after failed vaginal trial of labor and analyze related maternal and infant outcomes. Methods A total of 272 pregnant women admitted to the Department of Obstetrics of Jiaxing Maternal and Child Health Hospital from January 2023 to March 2024 were retrospectively selected as the research objects. Among them,172 pregnant women who underwent cesarean section after failed vaginal trial of labor were set as the observation group,and 100 pregnant women who successfully delivered vaginally after trial of labor were set as the control group. Univariate analysis was performed on the pregnancy data of the two groups of pregnant women. Factors with P<0.05 in univariate analysis were included in multivariate logistic regression analysis to screen out the independent influencing factors of cesarean section after failed vaginal trial of labor. According to the β value of independent influencing factors,a risk prediction model was constructed. The ROC curve was used to evaluate the efficacy of the risk prediction model in predicting cesarean section after failed vaginal trial of labor. The maternal and infant outcomes of the two groups were compared. Results The BMI at delivery,uterine height,fetal biparietal diameter,and induction proportion of pregnant women in the observation group were all higher than those in the control group,and the cervical Bishop score and the proportion of multiparous women were lower than those in the control group,with statistically significant (all P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that high BMI at delivery was an independent risk factor for cesarean section after failed vaginal trial of labor (P<0.05),and high cervical Bishop score and multiparity were independent protective factors for cesarean section after failed vaginal trial of labor (both P<0.05). According to the β value of each influencing factor,a risk prediction model was established. The risk prediction model=0.259×BMI at delivery-0.353×cervical Bishop score-2.180×multiparity. ROC curve analysis showed that the AUC of the risk prediction model for predicting cesarean section after failed vaginal trial of labor was 0.862,which was higher than that of BMI at delivery (AUC=0.756),cervical Bishop score (AUC=0.729),and multiparity (AUC=0.655),and the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.01). The neonatal weight,bleeding during delivery,and neonatal asphyxia rate in the observation group were all higher than those in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.05). Conclusion The risk prediction model combining BMI at delivery,cervical Bishop score,and multiparity has good predictive value for cesarean section after failed vaginal trial of labor. Cesarean section after failed trial of labor increases the risk of neonatal asphyxia and bleeding during delivery.

Cesarean section after failed trial of laborDeliveryNeonatal asphyxia

徐维娜、艾玲

展开 >

314000 嘉兴市妇幼保健院产科

中转剖宫产 分娩 新生儿窒息

2024

浙江医学
浙江省医学会

浙江医学

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.428
ISSN:1006-2785
年,卷(期):2024.46(22)