照明工程学报2024,Vol.35Issue(2) :17-23.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-440X.2024.02.003

相关标准紫外危害评估的差异研究

Research on the Differences in Relevant Standards for Ultraviolet Hazard Assessment

陈奏谔 邵姝 肖少辉
照明工程学报2024,Vol.35Issue(2) :17-23.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-440X.2024.02.003

相关标准紫外危害评估的差异研究

Research on the Differences in Relevant Standards for Ultraviolet Hazard Assessment

陈奏谔 1邵姝 1肖少辉1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. UL Solutions,广 东 广州 511458
  • 折叠

摘要

紫外产品目前在世界上被广泛应用于医院、学校、家庭等场所,具有净化空气、消毒环保的作用,由于产品存在紫外波段对人体有一定的危害性,评估紫外危害程度就显得尤为重要.本文从波长采样间隔、曝辐限值、紫外危害加权函数等方面,对不同的光生物标准IEC 62471:2006、GB/T 20145-2006和ANSI/IES RP-27.1-22在紫外危害评估的差异进行了分析比较,期望能够帮助读者更深入了解不同国家或地区在光化学紫外安全相关标准之间的差异.实验随机选取了三个光谱源数据,通过参考不同区域的标准来分析光化学紫外危害评估的差异.

Abstract

Ultraviolet(UV)products are currently widely used in hospitals,schools,homes,and other places around the world,playing a role in purifying air and disinfecting the environment.Due to the potential harmful effects of ultraviolet radiation on the human body,it is especially important to assess the degree of ultraviolet hazard.The article analyzes and compares the difference in ultraviolet hazard assessment among different photobiological standards,such as IEC 62471:2006,GB/T 20145-2006 and ANSI/IES RP-27.1-22,from aspects including wavelength sampling interval,exposure limit and UV hazard weighting functions.The aim is to help readers gain a deeper understanding of the differences between photobiological safety standards in different countries or regions regarding ultraviolet radiation.The experiment randomly selected data from three spectral sources and analyzed the differences in photobiological ultraviolet hazard assessment by referencing standards from different regions.

关键词

光生物安全/光化学紫外危害加权函数/紫外辐射/有效积分光谱辐照度/标准

Key words

photobiological safety/actinic ultraviolet hazard weighting function/ultraviolet radiation/effective integrated spectral irradiance/standard

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
照明工程学报
中国照明学会

照明工程学报

影响因子:0.745
ISSN:1004-440X
参考文献量10
段落导航相关论文